Does God need to prove He exists?
in [Physics]
|
From: Alex W. on 6 Aug 2008 05:07 "rbwinn" <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in message news:da870064-4360-4aaf-b06b-76235291b130(a)k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... I have never hired a lawyer or been represented in court by a lawyer. Citizens of the United States have the right to represent themselves in court. ============= ..... and the technical legal term for such a citizen is "fool".....
From: Alex W. on 6 Aug 2008 05:08 "rbwinn" <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in message news:9bdcfe91-2a42-4b75-8582-4f87ed8bfac3(a)79g2000hsk.googlegroups.com... If the Bible exists, then it is evidence. So does it exist or not? ========== At best iut is hearsay.
From: Alex W. on 6 Aug 2008 05:09 "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" <alwhipp(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote in message news:3000e035-8de1-4c06-aeaf-67726aaec74c(a)j7g2000prm.googlegroups.com... > On Aug 6, 12:27 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: >> The sixth amendment to the Constitution says that the defendant has >> the right to trial by jury in "all criminal prosecutions". The judge >> in my case had just denied my right to trial by jury. >> Robert B. Winn > > Probably to minimise the number of people that will need trauma > counselling from trying to follow your gibberish before they realise > it's complete gibberish. And it's not even authentic frontier gibberish ...
From: Steve O on 6 Aug 2008 05:14 "DanielSan" <danielsan(a)speakeasy.net> wrote in message news:E8adnZh0I57JjATVnZ2dnUVZ_gKdnZ2d(a)speakeasy.net... > rbwinn wrote: >> On Aug 5, 1:38�pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote: >>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message >>> >>> news:b869657a-8ad3-4d4d-9f10-5440569a3345(a)34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Aug 4, 10:01 pm, DanielSan <daniel...(a)speakeasy.net> wrote: >>>>> rbwinn wrote: >>>>>> On Aug 4, 3:54 pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote: >>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:147d2d46-ff33-4aac-b29a-7e24af243840(a)k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... >>>>>>>> On Aug 3, 8:56 pm, DanielSan <daniel...(a)speakeasy.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Aug 3, 4:29 pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 15:24:56 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn >>>>>>>>>>> <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote >>>>>>>>>>> in alt.atheism: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 3, 8:12?am, DanielSan <daniel...(a)speakeasy.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 2, 8:53 pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:08:55 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in alt.atheism: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 1, 2:30?pm, DanielSan <daniel...(a)speakeasy.net> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Discuss it with John after the resurrection. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No proof of this alleged "resurrection", is there? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, actually there is. The apostles were witnesses of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resurrected Christ on two separate occasions. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No evidence backs up your claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, I could send you a copy of the Bible if you want one. >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a Bible. ?There's no evidence in there to back up your >>>>>>>>>>>>> claim. >>>>>>>>>>>> John 20:19 Then the same day at evening, being the first day of >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> week, when the doors were shut where the disciples were >>>>>>>>>>>> assembled >>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>> fear of the Jews, came Jesus and stood in the midst, and saith >>>>>>>>>>>> unto >>>>>>>>>>>> them, Peace be unto you. >>>>>>>>>>>> John 21:9 As soon then as they were come to land, they saw a >>>>>>>>>>>> fire >>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>> coals there, and fish laid thereon, and bread. >>>>>>>>>>>> 10 Jesus saith unto them, Bring of the fish which ye have now >>>>>>>>>>>> caught. >>>>>>>>>>>> 11 Simon Peter went up, and drew the net to land full of great >>>>>>>>>>>> fishes, an hundred and fifty and three: and for all there were >>>>>>>>>>>> so >>>>>>>>>>>> many, yet was not the net broken. >>>>>>>>>>>> 12Jesus saith unto them Come and dine, And none of the >>>>>>>>>>>> disciples >>>>>>>>>>>> durst >>>>>>>>>>>> ask him , Who art thou? knowing that it was the Lord. >>>>>>>>>>>> 13 Jesus then cometh , and taketh bread, and giveth them, and >>>>>>>>>>>> fish >>>>>>>>>>>> likewise. >>>>>>>>>>>> 14 This is now the third time that Jesus shewed himself to his >>>>>>>>>>>> disciples, after that he was risen from the dead. >>>>>>>>>>> The Bible still is not evidence. I asked for evidence.- Hide >>>>>>>>>>> quoted >>>>>>>>>>> text - >>>>>>>>>> The Bible is accepted as evidence in court. >>>>>>>>> For what kinds of cases? >>>>>>>> For all kinds of cases. Clarence Darrow had the Bible entered as >>>>>>>> evidence in the monkey trial. >>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn >>>>>>> All kinds if cases? >>>>>>> You mean, "one type of case"? >>>>>> No, a lawyer can attempt to introduce any physical object as evidence >>>>>> in a court case. >>>>> But, will it be ACCEPTED as evidence? >>>>> You keep trying these clever games with your debating tactics. Clever, >>>>> to you. Lame and flimsy to everyone else. >>>> Not today. �A judge today in the United States will not even allow the >>>> Constitution of the United States to be entered as evidence. >>>> Robert B. Winn >>> It depends on what you are trying to prove. >>> Why were you trying to introduce the Constitution as evidence, and how >>> could >>> it prove or disprove anything in relation to your particular >>> circumstabces? >>> >>> -- >> The sixth amendment to the Constitution says that the defendant has >> the right to trial by jury in "all criminal prosecutions". The judge >> in my case had just denied my right to trial by jury. > > Then you can appeal. > Not on those grounds he can't. ;-) The only grounds for appeal he has would be to provide evidence that the judgment of the three doctors who declared him insane was mistaken and incorrect. Not much chance of that, is there? -- Steve O a.a. #2240 (Apatheist Chapter) B.A.A.W.A. Convicted by Earthquack Exempt from purgatory by papal indulgence
From: Steve O on 6 Aug 2008 05:17
"rbwinn" <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in message news:66950fe7-48ce-4296-8264-2331b02d4d21(a)r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... > On Aug 5, 7:49�pm, DanielSan <daniel...(a)speakeasy.net> wrote: >> rbwinn wrote: >> > On Aug 5, 1:38 pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote: >> >> "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message >> >> >>news:b869657a-8ad3-4d4d-9f10-5440569a3345(a)34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... >> >> >>> On Aug 4, 10:01 pm, DanielSan <daniel...(a)speakeasy.net> wrote: >> >>>> rbwinn wrote: >> >>>>> On Aug 4, 3:54 pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote: >> >>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message >> >>>>>>news:147d2d46-ff33-4aac-b29a-7e24af243840(a)k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... >> >>>>>>> On Aug 3, 8:56 pm, DanielSan <daniel...(a)speakeasy.net> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> On Aug 3, 4:29 pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 15:24:56 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn >> >>>>>>>>>> <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote >> >>>>>>>>>> in alt.atheism: >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 3, 8:12?am, DanielSan <daniel...(a)speakeasy.net> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 2, 8:53 pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:08:55 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <rbwi...(a)juno.com> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in alt.atheism: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 1, 2:30?pm, DanielSan <daniel...(a)speakeasy.net> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Discuss it with John after the resurrection. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No proof of this alleged "resurrection", is there? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, actually there is. The apostles were witnesses of >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resurrected Christ on two separate occasions. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No evidence backs up your claim. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, I could send you a copy of the Bible if you want one. >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have a Bible. ?There's no evidence in there to back up >> >>>>>>>>>>>> your >> >>>>>>>>>>>> claim. >> >>>>>>>>>>> John 20:19 Then the same day at evening, being the first day >> >>>>>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>>>> week, when the doors were shut where the disciples were >> >>>>>>>>>>> assembled >> >>>>>>>>>>> for >> >>>>>>>>>>> fear of the Jews, came Jesus and stood in the midst, and >> >>>>>>>>>>> saith >> >>>>>>>>>>> unto >> >>>>>>>>>>> them, Peace be unto you. >> >>>>>>>>>>> John 21:9 As soon then as they were come to land, they saw a >> >>>>>>>>>>> fire >> >>>>>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>>>>> coals there, and fish laid thereon, and bread. >> >>>>>>>>>>> 10 Jesus saith unto them, Bring of the fish which ye have now >> >>>>>>>>>>> caught. >> >>>>>>>>>>> 11 Simon Peter went up, and drew the net to land full of >> >>>>>>>>>>> great >> >>>>>>>>>>> fishes, an hundred and fifty and three: and for all there >> >>>>>>>>>>> were so >> >>>>>>>>>>> many, yet was not the net broken. >> >>>>>>>>>>> 12Jesus saith unto them Come and dine, And none of the >> >>>>>>>>>>> disciples >> >>>>>>>>>>> durst >> >>>>>>>>>>> ask him , Who art thou? knowing that it was the Lord. >> >>>>>>>>>>> 13 Jesus then cometh , and taketh bread, and giveth them, and >> >>>>>>>>>>> fish >> >>>>>>>>>>> likewise. >> >>>>>>>>>>> 14 This is now the third time that Jesus shewed himself to >> >>>>>>>>>>> his >> >>>>>>>>>>> disciples, after that he was risen from the dead. >> >>>>>>>>>> The Bible still is not evidence. I asked for evidence.- Hide >> >>>>>>>>>> quoted >> >>>>>>>>>> text - >> >>>>>>>>> The Bible is accepted as evidence in court. >> >>>>>>>> For what kinds of cases? >> >>>>>>> For all kinds of cases. Clarence Darrow had the Bible entered as >> >>>>>>> evidence in the monkey trial. >> >>>>>>> Robert B. Winn >> >>>>>> All kinds if cases? >> >>>>>> You mean, "one type of case"? >> >>>>> No, a lawyer can attempt to introduce any physical object as >> >>>>> evidence >> >>>>> in a court case. >> >>>> But, will it be ACCEPTED as evidence? >> >>>> You keep trying these clever games with your debating tactics. >> >>>> Clever, >> >>>> to you. Lame and flimsy to everyone else. >> >>> Not today. A judge today in the United States will not even allow the >> >>> Constitution of the United States to be entered as evidence. >> >>> Robert B. Winn >> >> It depends on what you are trying to prove. >> >> Why were you trying to introduce the Constitution as evidence, and how >> >> could >> >> it prove or disprove anything in relation to your particular >> >> circumstabces? >> >> >> -- >> > The sixth amendment to the Constitution says that the defendant has >> > the right to trial by jury in "all criminal prosecutions". � The judge >> > in my case had just denied my right to trial by jury. >> >> Then you can appeal. >> > I do appeal every time I am denied trial by jury. > Robert B. Winn You are not a criminal, and you were not found "guilty" of anything The sixth amendment entitles any person accused of a criminal act a right to a trial by jury. However - you had not committed any criminal act- you were simply insane and required hospitalization. You wasted your time appealing on the grounds of the sixth amendment. You would have been better off trying to prove your sanity rather than following that line. -- Steve O a.a. #2240 (Apatheist Chapter) B.A.A.W.A. Convicted by Earthquack Exempt from purgatory by papal indulgence |