Does God need to prove He exists?
in [Physics]
|
From: Yap on 20 Aug 2008 22:34 You are wrong here. I know Roman history were taught in school and not Jewish history. rbwinn wrote: > On Aug 18, 9:52�pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" > <alwh...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > On Aug 19, 2:12 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > > > > > On Aug 18, 7:53 pm, Yap <hhyaps...(a)gmail.com> wrote:> What do you mean by atheists never do much? > > > > Do you know that we save time by not attending church to pray to > > > > nonsense, in order to do work, care for our family, do research, etc? > > > > > I read a book by an atheist named Nearing who bought a farm in New > > > Hampshire or somewhere, and he and his wife became farmers. �But they > > > found out that they needed a day of rest because they got too tired if > > > they did not take one day in seven off. > > > Robert B. Winn > > > > One day in eight worked for the Romans quite well. �About 20%-40% of > > days off on any schedule works best as far as work efficiency goes. > > And that 7 day thing isn't christian or even jewish, belonging to > > civilisations at least as old as Babylon and Sumeria, but due to being > > shared by Hindu peoples probably originating in some old sanskrit or > > older community. �And, it's not universal. �Many societies have > > different week lengths, from 3 to 8 days. �It's mostly dependant on > > how often makes a good frequency of market days. �It's only in these > > times where anglo-saxon culture has dominated other societies that the > > 7 day week has propogated around the globe. > > > > Al > > Well, the Romans have had less lasting influence than the Jews on > society even though they crushed the Jews with their military might. > The Jews were just more productive people. > Robert B. Winn
From: rbwinn on 20 Aug 2008 23:20 On Aug 20, 7:16�pm, Yap <hhyaps...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Steve, > Your message make a lot of sense. > We tend to be clear in our mind whether or not a particular situation > is correct or reasonable. > But, all the loons in the world behave the same way, they take bible > for granted and even if they are suspicious of a particular event, > they will not raise any question. > Those events described in the bible were not the same as scientific > theories or mathematical equations which were based on values and > facts. > They were presented in the supernatural sense but lackedthe ability to > withstand simple scrutiny or reasoning. > For all the power attributed to god, he was not projected to exercise > his capability to benefit human. What good would the god be? > Sad, sad..... > Well, here in sci.physics.relativity we talk about relativity of time. You atheists and other absolute time disciples look at the time of today, compare it to what happened yesterday and from that conclude that nothing different could have ever happened in the history of the earth. People who consider the subject more deeply are aware that time is relative, and is not only affected by velocity, as the equations of modern scientists show. So using your ideas based on absolute time, you followers of European philosophy conclude that what occured today must have occurred in every day of the earth's history, and no other explanation is possible. Time measures the number of events that take place in an interval. If the interval is one rotation of the earth, who is to say that eleven billion years of dinosaurs counted by transitions of a cesium isotope molecule under present conditions could not have occurred in one rotation of the earth? You absolute time atheists are all thrilled about relativity of time except when it does not suit your purposes. Robert B. Winn
From: rbwinn on 20 Aug 2008 23:23 On Aug 20, 7:30�pm, Yap <hhyaps...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Well, I studied post graduate in British university at Manchester city > previously. > There were no European propaganda but most people did not bother to > talk in Christianity, due to the fact that the tales were so obviously > invented. > British loons in most cases got cornered when being questioned about > the inability of their god to do reasonable things. > They evaded and switched subjects, like you did. > I don't evade and switch subjects. The subject is relativity of time. That is what we discuss here in sci.physics.relativity. Robert B. Winn
From: rbwinn on 20 Aug 2008 23:27 On Aug 20, 7:34�pm, Yap <hhyaps...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > You are wrong here. > I know Roman history were taught in school and not Jewish history. > That is correct. So who do you think had the greatest influence on Europe, the Jews or the Nazi Party? The Nazi and Fascist Parties were patterned after Roman government. Robert B. Winn
From: rbwinn on 20 Aug 2008 23:28
On Aug 20, 7:41�pm, Yap <hhyaps...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Some important points: > 1). You know revelations are nonsense and had never been correct. > 2). Why would a temple be so difficult to build? > > There is a Muslim mosque called the Dome of the Rock located on the temple site. Robert B. Winn |