Does God need to prove He exists?
in [Physics]
|
From: Smiler on 21 Aug 2008 22:16 rbwinn wrote: > On Aug 20, 9:11?pm, Yap <hhyaps...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Wrong. >> The Nazi party was a past organization trying to elevate the >> financial status of German people. The Jews were trying to dominate >> then, like the current Jews in the US. >> There is no more influence of Roman culture in this world now, let >> alone Jewish. >> >> >> >> rbwinn wrote: >>> On Aug 20, 7:34 pm, Yap <hhyaps...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> You are wrong here. >>>> I know Roman history were taught in school and not Jewish history. >> >>> That is correct. ?So who do you think had the greatest influence on >>> Europe, the Jews or the Nazi Party? ? The Nazi and Fascist Parties >>> were patterned after Roman government. >>> Robert B. Winn- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > For crying out loud, Yap. Haven't you ever heard of the Holy Roman > empire? Where do you think it was? > With regard to the Fascist Party, it was advertised as being Roman > government. Mussolini's fascist party certainly was a 'Roman' government, as it governed from Rome and was led by a Roman Catholic. Smiler, The godless one a.a.# 2279
From: rbwinn on 21 Aug 2008 22:20 On Aug 21, 6:57�pm, "Smiler" <Smi...(a)Joe.King.com> wrote: > rbwinn wrote: > > On Aug 20, 7:41?pm, Yap <hhyaps...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Some important points: > >> 1). You know revelations are nonsense and had never been correct. > >> 2). Why would a temple be so difficult to build? > > > There is a Muslim mosque called the Dome of the Rock located on the > > temple site. > > Are there any other sorts of Mosque? Why do you ask? Robert B. Winn
From: rbwinn on 21 Aug 2008 22:27 On Aug 21, 7:08�pm, "Smiler" <Smi...(a)Joe.King.com> wrote: > rbwinn wrote: > > On Aug 20, 9:58?pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" > > <alwh...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > >> On Aug 21, 1:23 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > > >>> On Aug 20, 7:30 pm, Yap <hhyaps...(a)gmail.com> wrote:> Well, I > >>> studied post graduate in British university at Manchester city > >>>> previously. > >>>> There were no European propaganda but most people did not bother to > >>>> talk in Christianity, due to the fact that the tales were so > >>>> obviously invented. > >>>> British loons in most cases got cornered when being questioned > >>>> about the inability of their god to do reasonable things. > >>>> They evaded and switched subjects, like you did. > > >>> I don't evade and switch subjects. ?The subject is relativity of > >>> time. ?That is what we discuss here in sci.physics.relativity. > >>> Robert B. Winn > > >> No. ?The discussion was started by a Mitch who began discussing the > >> subject line in typical retarded fashion. ?And your first comment was > >> not in any way connected to relativity. > >> How many times do you need to be corrected on this lie? > > >> Al > > > So, Al, are you saying that we are not allowed to discuss relativity > > of time here in sci.physics.relativity? �How are you going �to enforce > > your edict? > > �So, skippy, are you saying that we are not allowed to discuss atheism here > in alt.atheism without interference from religious loonies like you? �How > are you going to enforce your edict? > How would you discuss atheism? There is nothing there to discuss. All you can do is discuss religion. Robert B. Winn
From: rbwinn on 21 Aug 2008 22:28 On Aug 21, 7:16�pm, "Smiler" <Smi...(a)Joe.King.com> wrote: > rbwinn wrote: > > On Aug 20, 9:11?pm, Yap <hhyaps...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Wrong. > >> The Nazi party was a past organization trying to elevate the > >> financial status of German people. The Jews were trying to dominate > >> then, like the current Jews in the US. > >> There is no more influence of Roman culture in this world now, let > >> alone Jewish. > > >> rbwinn wrote: > >>> On Aug 20, 7:34 pm, Yap <hhyaps...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> You are wrong here. > >>>> I know Roman history were taught in school and not Jewish history. > > >>> That is correct. ?So who do you think had the greatest influence on > >>> Europe, the Jews or the Nazi Party? ? The Nazi and Fascist Parties > >>> were patterned after Roman government. > >>> Robert B. Winn- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > For crying out loud, Yap. �Haven't you ever heard of the Holy Roman > > empire? �Where do you think it was? > > With regard to the Fascist Party, it was advertised as being Roman > > government. > > Mussolini's fascist party certainly was a 'Roman' government, as it governed > from Rome and was led by a Roman Catholic. > Well, it was patterned after ancient Roman government, which was a pagan government. Robert B. Winn
From: Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al) on 21 Aug 2008 23:51
On Aug 21, 3:08 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > On Aug 20, 9:58 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" > > > > <alwh...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > On Aug 21, 1:23 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > > > > On Aug 20, 7:30 pm, Yap <hhyaps...(a)gmail.com> wrote:> Well, I studied post graduate in British university at Manchester city > > > > previously. > > > > There were no European propaganda but most people did not bother to > > > > talk in Christianity, due to the fact that the tales were so obviously > > > > invented. > > > > British loons in most cases got cornered when being questioned about > > > > the inability of their god to do reasonable things. > > > > They evaded and switched subjects, like you did. > > > > I don't evade and switch subjects. The subject is relativity of > > > time. That is what we discuss here in sci.physics.relativity. > > > Robert B. Winn > > > No. The discussion was started by a Mitch who began discussing the > > subject line in typical retarded fashion. And your first comment was > > not in any way connected to relativity. > > How many times do you need to be corrected on this lie? > > > Al > > So, Al, are you saying that we are not allowed to discuss relativity > of time here in sci.physics.relativity? No, I did not say that. In no way should that be infered from my comments. Your attempt to say that that is what I've said is a typical representation of your lying and attempts to sway conversations to suggest you are being repressed in some way, which again is typical of both christians and paranoid schitzos. > How are you going to enforce > your edict? I'm not, as it's not an edict. I am going to correct you everytime I spot you lying outright about what others or yourself have said. Al |