Does God need to prove He exists?
in [Physics]
|
From: Yap on 21 Aug 2008 00:11 Wrong. The Nazi party was a past organization trying to elevate the financial status of German people. The Jews were trying to dominate then, like the current Jews in the US. There is no more influence of Roman culture in this world now, let alone Jewish. rbwinn wrote: > On Aug 20, 7:34�pm, Yap <hhyaps...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > You are wrong here. > > I know Roman history were taught in school and not Jewish history. > > > > > That is correct. So who do you think had the greatest influence on > Europe, the Jews or the Nazi Party? The Nazi and Fascist Parties > were patterned after Roman government. > Robert B. Winn
From: Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al) on 21 Aug 2008 00:58 On Aug 21, 1:23 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > On Aug 20, 7:30 pm, Yap <hhyaps...(a)gmail.com> wrote:> Well, I studied post graduate in British university at Manchester city > > previously. > > There were no European propaganda but most people did not bother to > > talk in Christianity, due to the fact that the tales were so obviously > > invented. > > British loons in most cases got cornered when being questioned about > > the inability of their god to do reasonable things. > > They evaded and switched subjects, like you did. > > I don't evade and switch subjects. The subject is relativity of > time. That is what we discuss here in sci.physics.relativity. > Robert B. Winn No. The discussion was started by a Mitch who began discussing the subject line in typical retarded fashion. And your first comment was not in any way connected to relativity. How many times do you need to be corrected on this lie? Al
From: rbwinn on 21 Aug 2008 01:08 On Aug 20, 9:58�pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" <alwh...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > On Aug 21, 1:23 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > > > On Aug 20, 7:30 pm, Yap <hhyaps...(a)gmail.com> wrote:> Well, I studied post graduate in British university at Manchester city > > > previously. > > > There were no European propaganda but most people did not bother to > > > talk in Christianity, due to the fact that the tales were so obviously > > > invented. > > > British loons in most cases got cornered when being questioned about > > > the inability of their god to do reasonable things. > > > They evaded and switched subjects, like you did. > > > I don't evade and switch subjects. �The subject is relativity of > > time. �That is what we discuss here in sci.physics.relativity. > > Robert B. Winn > > No. �The discussion was started by a Mitch who began discussing the > subject line in typical retarded fashion. �And your first comment was > not in any way connected to relativity. > How many times do you need to be corrected on this lie? > > Al So, Al, are you saying that we are not allowed to discuss relativity of time here in sci.physics.relativity? How are you going to enforce your edict? Robert B. Winn
From: Yap on 21 Aug 2008 02:39 You have no basic understanding of subjects like history, psychology, philosophy and science. Your high school standard does not give you enough knowledge to talk about relativity of time, with respect to the happening in this world. You are also trying to equate events in the past to present in order to defend your Jesus/god thing. There is no correlation here. Events happened in the past, unless real and true, had no influence on things in present day. Jesus and the invented term "god" have no meaning in our world now. rbwinn wrote: > On Aug 20, 7:16�pm, Yap <hhyaps...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Steve, > > Your message make a lot of sense. > > We tend to be clear in our mind whether or not a particular situation > > is correct or reasonable. > > But, all the loons in the world behave the same way, they take bible > > for granted and even if they are suspicious of a particular event, > > they will not raise any question. > > Those events described in the bible were not the same as scientific > > theories or mathematical equations which were based on values and > > facts. > > They were presented in the supernatural sense but lackedthe ability to > > withstand simple scrutiny or reasoning. > > For all the power attributed to god, he was not projected to exercise > > his capability to benefit human. What good would the god be? > > Sad, sad..... > > > Well, here in sci.physics.relativity we talk about relativity of > time. You atheists and other absolute time disciples look at the time > of today, compare it to what happened yesterday and from that conclude > that nothing different could have ever happened in the history of the > earth. > People who consider the subject more deeply are aware that time is > relative, and is not only affected by velocity, as the equations of > modern scientists show. So using your ideas based on absolute time, > you followers of European philosophy conclude that what occured today > must have occurred in every day of the earth's history, and no other > explanation is possible. > Time measures the number of events that take place in an > interval. If the interval is one rotation of the earth, who is to say > that eleven billion years of dinosaurs counted by transitions of a > cesium isotope molecule under present conditions could not have > occurred in one rotation of the earth? > You absolute time atheists are all thrilled about relativity of > time except when it does not suit your purposes. > Robert B. Winn
From: rbwinn on 21 Aug 2008 09:07
On Aug 20, 9:11�pm, Yap <hhyaps...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Wrong. > The Nazi party was a past organization trying to elevate the financial > status of German people. The Jews were trying to dominate then, like > the current Jews in the US. > There is no more influence of Roman culture in this world now, let > alone Jewish. > > > > rbwinn wrote: > > On Aug 20, 7:34 pm, Yap <hhyaps...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > You are wrong here. > > > I know Roman history were taught in school and not Jewish history. > > > That is correct. �So who do you think had the greatest influence on > > Europe, the Jews or the Nazi Party? � The Nazi and Fascist Parties > > were patterned after Roman government. > > Robert B. Winn- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - For crying out loud, Yap. Haven't you ever heard of the Holy Roman empire? Where do you think it was? With regard to the Fascist Party, it was advertised as being Roman government. Robert B. Winn |