From: Phil Bouchard on
Androcles wrote:
>
> Very logical. And since v is relative then energy must be relative too.
> How much potential energy does a rock have if it is on the floor above
> you?

PE = m_rock * g * h_floor

> How much potential energy does a rock have if it is two floors above
> you?

PE = m_rock * g * h_floor * 2

> How much potential energy does a rock have if it is on the floor below
> you?

PE = m_rock * g * - h_floor
From: Androcles on

"Phil Bouchard" <phil(a)fornux.com> wrote in message
news:4b609581$1(a)news.x-privat.org...
> Androcles wrote:
>>
>> Very logical. And since v is relative then energy must be relative too.
>> How much potential energy does a rock have if it is on the floor above
>> you?
>
> PE = m_rock * g * h_floor
>
>> How much potential energy does a rock have if it is two floors above
>> you?
>
> PE = m_rock * g * h_floor * 2
>
>> How much potential energy does a rock have if it is on the floor below
>> you?
>
> PE = m_rock * g * - h_floor

Ok, so PE can be negative.
Now the rock falls and the PE is converted to KE.

What is the KE of 1/2 m_rock * v^2 when v is negative?







From: Phil Bouchard on
Androcles wrote:
>
> Ok, so PE can be negative.
> Now the rock falls and the PE is converted to KE.
>
> What is the KE of 1/2 m_rock * v^2 when v is negative?

KE = 1/2 m_rock * v^2

KE will always be positive.
From: Androcles on

"Phil Bouchard" <phil(a)fornux.com> wrote in message
news:4b6099c1$1(a)news.x-privat.org...
> Androcles wrote:
>>
>> Ok, so PE can be negative.
>> Now the rock falls and the PE is converted to KE.
>>
>> What is the KE of 1/2 m_rock * v^2 when v is negative?
>
> KE = 1/2 m_rock * v^2
>
> KE will always be positive.

"Negative PE converts to positive KE." - Phil Bouchard.
Illogical idiot alert!




From: PD on
On Jan 27, 2:26 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_s> wrote:

>
> "Negative PE converts to positive KE." - Phil Bouchard.
> Illogical idiot alert!

Oh, Androcles, surely you can't be so stupid as to think you've laid
an artful trap.
Well, maybe for a buffoon like Phil, yes, but if you really believe
this is a fundamental problem with the law of conservation of energy,
then it's time to get the rust-brush out again.
(But you and I know that you're just playing little games for the
purposes of heckling.)