FR Bending of Light -- Proof
in [Relativity]
|
From: Phil Bouchard on 22 Jan 2010 18:22 PD wrote: > > Nope. If you think other sciences use common sense to be the decider, > then you are sadly deluded. Excuses, excuses, ... All you have to do is propel Einstein into a Supergod to obtain grants and cancel any challenge.
From: eric gisse on 22 Jan 2010 20:03 Phil Bouchard wrote: > eric gisse wrote: > > [...] > >>> This is not serious, seriously. So we fall back to that spacetime warp >>> deadlocked logic. >> >> So Phil, do you even have enough knowledge of electromagnetic theory to >> understand the paper you just dismissed out of hand? Relativity did not >> have to be invoked once to explain the phenomena. >> >> If not, why are you talking about articles you do not understand? > > The *time* is warped: > > "This phenomenon is caused by an interplay between the time scales > present in the pulse and the time scales present in the medium." Really, Phil? How does that sentence imply that time is warped? Perhaps if you read the article and had a little background in electromagnetic theory you would understand instead of making wild assed assertions. > > > Doug really stuffed you with overconfidence... Well since I can read the article and comprehend it, and you can do neither, I'd say I earned my overconfidence.
From: eric gisse on 22 Jan 2010 20:03 Phil Bouchard wrote: > PD wrote: >> >> Nope. If you think other sciences use common sense to be the decider, >> then you are sadly deluded. > > Excuses, excuses, ... All you have to do is propel Einstein into a > Supergod to obtain grants and cancel any challenge. Have you ever seen a grant application, Phil?
From: PD on 23 Jan 2010 15:04 On Jan 22, 5:22 pm, Phil Bouchard <p...(a)fornux.com> wrote: > PD wrote: > > > Nope. If you think other sciences use common sense to be the decider, > > then you are sadly deluded. > > Excuses, excuses, ... All you have to do is propel Einstein into a > Supergod Not at all. He's no god. Just a physicist. Happened to get a few things right. > to obtain grants and cancel any challenge. First you have to mount a challenge. If you enter a boxing ring with a world-class boxer and say, "I challenge you!," trust me, that's no challenge.
From: Phil Bouchard on 25 Jan 2010 13:43
PD wrote: > > Not at all. He's no god. Just a physicist. Happened to get a few > things right. Well the 2 postulates of SR are wrong, E=mc^2 never really was proven, ... > First you have to mount a challenge. If you enter a boxing ring with a > world-class boxer and say, "I challenge you!," trust me, that's no > challenge. If you're already some national champion he'll have to accept the challenge actually. That's how it is, you challenge state title holders after winning regional ones; you go on with the national tournament after winning the state-wise one; and you then end up with world class championships if all went well at your national tournament. |