FR Bending of Light -- Proof
in [Relativity]
|
From: Androcles on 21 Jan 2010 20:10 "Phil Bouchard" <phil(a)fornux.com> wrote in message news:4b58f81b$1(a)news.x-privat.org... > Uncle Al wrote: >> >> 1) 40 years of solar grazing incidence quasar displacement studies. >> 2) 20 years of astronomic Einstein rings and gravitational lensing. >> 3) idiot > > Right, but the only problem is you cannot disprove FR. You cannot disprove bright green flying elephants lay their eggs in black holes. Two idiots, you and Schwartz. Right.
From: Uncle Al on 21 Jan 2010 20:42 Phil Bouchard wrote: > > Uncle Al wrote: > > > > 1) 40 years of solar grazing incidence quasar displacement studies. > > 2) 20 years of astronomic Einstein rings and gravitational lensing. > > 3) idiot > > Right, but the only problem is you cannot disprove FR. idiot -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
From: eric gisse on 21 Jan 2010 21:07 Phil Bouchard wrote: > Uncle Al wrote: >> >> 1) 40 years of solar grazing incidence quasar displacement studies. >> 2) 20 years of astronomic Einstein rings and gravitational lensing. >> 3) idiot > > Right, but the only problem is you cannot disprove FR. Theories that do not make definitive predictions cannot be, by their very nature, disproved.
From: eric gisse on 21 Jan 2010 21:09 Phil Bouchard wrote: > eric gisse wrote: >> >> Nice to see your bias against those who have learned what you can not >> continues unabated. > > Excuses, excuses, ... I don't need to resort to passive aggressive abuses of language to make my point known. I have literature references - and actual aggression. Look Phil, it is clear that you either need more attention or forgot that people hate you here. Either way, you'll get abused until you once again pack up and leave for a few months when you'll start the cycle anew.
From: Phil Bouchard on 21 Jan 2010 22:06
eric gisse wrote: > > I don't need to resort to passive aggressive abuses of language to make my > point known. I have literature references - and actual aggression. > > Look Phil, it is clear that you either need more attention or forgot that > people hate you here. Either way, you'll get abused until you once again > pack up and leave for a few months when you'll start the cycle anew. I can't help people who don't want to help themselves so just speak for yourself in any event. This is a physics newsgroups and I am expecting comments from those who are willing to learn. |