FR Bending of Light -- Proof
in [Relativity]
|
From: Phil Bouchard on 21 Jan 2010 22:12 eric gisse wrote: > > Theories that do not make definitive predictions cannot be, by their very > nature, disproved. http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/41378 Did I talk about the Hubble Sphere?
From: Androcles on 21 Jan 2010 22:16 "Phil Bouchard" <phil(a)fornux.com> wrote in message news:4b59162b$1(a)news.x-privat.org... > eric gisse wrote: >> >> I don't need to resort to passive aggressive abuses of language to make >> my point known. I have literature references - and actual aggression. >> >> Look Phil, it is clear that you either need more attention or forgot that >> people hate you here. Either way, you'll get abused until you once again >> pack up and leave for a few months when you'll start the cycle anew. > > I can't help people who don't want to help themselves so just speak for > yourself in any event. > > This is a physics newsgroups and I am expecting comments from those who > are willing to learn. Just killfile the fuckwit. He's bigot, all bigot and nothing but the bigot.
From: eric gisse on 21 Jan 2010 22:19 Phil Bouchard wrote: > eric gisse wrote: >> >> I don't need to resort to passive aggressive abuses of language to make >> my point known. I have literature references - and actual aggression. >> >> Look Phil, it is clear that you either need more attention or forgot that >> people hate you here. Either way, you'll get abused until you once again >> pack up and leave for a few months when you'll start the cycle anew. > > I can't help people who don't want to help themselves so just speak for > yourself in any event. > > This is a physics newsgroups and I am expecting comments from those who > are willing to learn. And you think you have something to teach because...? What was the last textbook on relativity or even physics in general that you read?
From: PD on 22 Jan 2010 10:20 On Jan 21, 1:45 pm, Phil Bouchard <p...(a)fornux.com> wrote: > eric gisse wrote: > > > So Phil, how many copies of your book have you sold to people that are not > > related to you? > > To many Ph.Ds except relativists. Sold? What is "many"?
From: PD on 22 Jan 2010 10:22
On Jan 21, 9:06 pm, Phil Bouchard <p...(a)fornux.com> wrote: > eric gisse wrote: > > > I don't need to resort to passive aggressive abuses of language to make my > > point known. I have literature references - and actual aggression. > > > Look Phil, it is clear that you either need more attention or forgot that > > people hate you here. Either way, you'll get abused until you once again > > pack up and leave for a few months when you'll start the cycle anew. > > I can't help people who don't want to help themselves so just speak for > yourself in any event. > > This is a physics newsgroups and I am expecting comments from those who > are willing to learn. What you expect is not necessarily what you get. This is an open forum. If what you say is worthy of derision, then that's what you will receive. If what you say is worthy of support, then that's what you'll receive. If you think what you say is worthy of support, but what you receive is derision, then perhaps you should take something away from that mismatch, no? |