From: PD on 22 Jan 2010 16:32 On Jan 22, 12:36 pm, Phil Bouchard <p...(a)fornux.com> wrote: > J. Clarke wrote: > > > And since it contains no means by which it may be falsified, it is not > > science. > > Epic fail. > > "If it's not broken don't fix it!" -- Relativists It's certainly not broken, that's right.
From: eric gisse on 22 Jan 2010 16:39 Phil Bouchard wrote: > PD wrote: >> >> One doesn't owe a disproving to nonsense. FR has to compete with >> prevailing theories on the metrics that theories are measured by. If >> yours doesn't compete, it doesn't. It isn't owed a disproof. > > $1,000,000 Really, Phil? Show us a bank statement. > >> One can't disprove God, either. That doesn't make God a viable >> scientific theory. > > Great analogy but I think common sense should be the ultimate decider.
From: Phil Bouchard on 22 Jan 2010 17:33 PD wrote: [...] > And that's your mistake. A lot of cranks and goofballs here think that > relativity and quantum mechanics MUST be wrong because they are in > conflict with their common sense. Common sense does not decide, never > has, never should. You do know how models ARE tested in science, don't > you? Excuses not to work like everybody else...
From: Phil Bouchard on 22 Jan 2010 17:41 eric gisse wrote: [...] >> This is not serious, seriously. So we fall back to that spacetime warp >> deadlocked logic. > > So Phil, do you even have enough knowledge of electromagnetic theory to > understand the paper you just dismissed out of hand? Relativity did not have > to be invoked once to explain the phenomena. > > If not, why are you talking about articles you do not understand? The *time* is warped: "This phenomenon is caused by an interplay between the time scales present in the pulse and the time scales present in the medium." Doug really stuffed you with overconfidence...
From: PD on 22 Jan 2010 17:56
On Jan 22, 4:33 pm, Phil Bouchard <p...(a)fornux.com> wrote: > PD wrote: > > [...] > > > And that's your mistake. A lot of cranks and goofballs here think that > > relativity and quantum mechanics MUST be wrong because they are in > > conflict with their common sense. Common sense does not decide, never > > has, never should. You do know how models ARE tested in science, don't > > you? > > Excuses not to work like everybody else... Nope. If you think other sciences use common sense to be the decider, then you are sadly deluded. |