FR Bending of Light -- Proof
in [Relativity]
|
From: Phil Bouchard on 21 Jan 2010 15:21 Androcles wrote: > > Any good detective can discover the source of his sci-fi. > 'Really, this is what is meant by the Fourth Dimension, though some people > who talk about the Fourth Dimension do not know they mean it. It is only > another way of looking at Time. There is no difference between Time and any > of the three dimensions of Space except that our consciousness moves along > with it.' -- Herbert George Wells - "The Time Machine" - 1895 (when Albert > Fuckwit Einstein was 16 years old). "In 1927, Florence Deeks sued Wells for plagiarism"... this is a virus.
From: Phil Bouchard on 21 Jan 2010 15:34 Sam Wormley wrote: > > You aren't fooling anybody, Phil. What a crock! The only ones who think I'm attempting fooling them are the fooled.
From: Androcles on 21 Jan 2010 15:49 "Phil Bouchard" <phil(a)fornux.com> wrote in message news:4b58b748(a)news.x-privat.org... > Androcles wrote: >> >> Any good detective can discover the source of his sci-fi. >> 'Really, this is what is meant by the Fourth Dimension, though some >> people who talk about the Fourth Dimension do not know they mean it. It >> is only another way of looking at Time. There is no difference between >> Time and any of the three dimensions of Space except that our >> consciousness moves along with it.' -- Herbert George Wells - "The Time >> Machine" - 1895 (when Albert Fuckwit Einstein was 16 years old). > > "In 1927, Oops, I snipped part of your reply. What were you mumbling?
From: Phil Bouchard on 21 Jan 2010 16:56 eric gisse wrote: > > Nice to see your bias against those who have learned what you can not > continues unabated. Excuses, excuses, ...
From: Phil Bouchard on 21 Jan 2010 19:57
Uncle Al wrote: > > 1) 40 years of solar grazing incidence quasar displacement studies. > 2) 20 years of astronomic Einstein rings and gravitational lensing. > 3) idiot Right, but the only problem is you cannot disprove FR. |