Five Small Problems with AGW science.
in [Physics]
|
From: I M on 22 Feb 2010 17:16 On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:21:48 -0500, Yousuf Khan <bbbl67(a)spammenot.yahoo.com> wrote: >Marvin the Martian wrote: >> Scientific experts like Al Gore and Barack Obama assure us that the >> science of AGW is settled; and it is except for a few minor details, >> those details being: >> >> 1) There isn't any warming. Even Jones admits this. >> 2) CO2 doesn't cause the greenhouse effect. Water vapor does. >> 3) We didn't put the CO2 into the atmosphere. A warmer ocean did that. >> 4) AGW science isn't science, it's bullshit and leftist propaganda. >> 5) If there was warming, it wouldn't be bad, it would be good. >> >> Gawd, Humans are a gullible species. I can't believe you fell for AGW. > >This ain't no progressive vs. conservative positional test. There's >plenty of liberals who find the whole thing to be hokum too. > > Yousuf Khan Glad to hear it, even if it is hard to believe.
From: Dave Typinski on 23 Feb 2010 01:34 Chris L Peterson <clp(a)alumni.caltech.edu> wrote: > >On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 05:30:29 -0500, Dave Typinski <m�bius(a)trapezium.net> >wrote: > >>As an anthropogenic global warming skeptic, I'd like to point out why >>I--and possibly others--haven't seen fit to buy into global climate >>change... > >Hi Dave- > >While I disagree with your conclusion, and with a few of your basic >assumptions (for instance, the majority of the raw data _is_ publicly >available), I appreciate that you approach this using a rational >methodology. Your post should provide a good lesson to the idiots who >blindly state "that there is zero evidence for GW", and have no further >analysis. > >It is possible to have a reasoned, scientifically sound discussion when >a skeptic provides actual points to discuss! Yep, it can still happen--even on usenet. -- Dave
From: Dave Typinski on 23 Feb 2010 01:52 "David Staup" <dstaup(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >"Dave Typinski" <m�bius(a)trapezium.net> wrote in message >news:ko9vn5563iqfbv6ce701jbptgueki5tqmr(a)4ax.com... >> >> As an anthropogenic global warming skeptic, I'd like to point out why >> I--and possibly others--haven't seen fit to buy into global climate >> change. <snip> > >I would add only this..evidence that this has happened (global warming) >before is indisputable and evidence that the planet has generally been >warmer or colder than it is now is also indisputable (although probably more >on the warmer side) maybe we should be doing as much as possible to skew >towards warmer... Maybe. The issue isn't warm or cold. The real issue is change. People fear change because they fear the unknown because evolution has said that's the best way to survive. >as a side note you will never convince the AGW environmental activitists >that they might be wrong in any respect THEY are never wrong and know that >better than anything.. True; but, activists aren't to be taken too seriously. I'm more concerned about educating the rational, intelligent person. They're the ones who make the big decisions. -- Dave
From: oriel36 on 23 Feb 2010 14:01 On Feb 23, 7:52 am, Dave Typinski <möb...(a)trapezium.net> wrote: > "David Staup" <dst...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > >"Dave Typinski" <möb...(a)trapezium.net> wrote in message > >news:ko9vn5563iqfbv6ce701jbptgueki5tqmr(a)4ax.com... > > >> As an anthropogenic global warming skeptic, I'd like to point out why > >> I--and possibly others--haven't seen fit to buy into global climate > >> change. > <snip> > > >I would add only this..evidence that this has happened (global warming) > >before is indisputable and evidence that the planet has generally been > >warmer or colder than it is now is also indisputable (although probably more > >on the warmer side) maybe we should be doing as much as possible to skew > >towards warmer... > > Maybe. > > The issue isn't warm or cold. The real issue is change. People fear > change because they fear the unknown because evolution has said that's > the best way to survive. > Epicycle Dave,there is no issue,there are a bunch of people who believe they can control the global temperature level using a minor atmospheric gas and I find it hilarious.People are too lazy to delve into the matter in any meaningful way hence they deserve what they get but what is not funny is that the same ridiculous numbskulls teach kids in schools and this turns into into a holocaust.
From: [SMF] on 2 Mar 2010 20:14
On 2/22/2010 12:00 AM, Chris L Peterson wrote: > The world economy is likely to be totally destroyed by the changes in > climate that will occur over the next 50 years. Bwahaha. I'm sure the Brits will hate having the opportunity to grow grapes again. Idiot. |