GETTING RID OF EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: What is the Aether?
Next: Debunking Nimtz
From: Dr. Henri Wilson on 20 Oct 2007 21:57 On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 22:29:39 GMT, "Androcles" <Engineer(a)hogwarts.physics> wrote: > >"Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote in message >news:psukh3d9oq3hkc7ol4ost9ehg7onmn20vu(a)4ax.com... >: On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 15:13:27 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" >: <paul.b.andersen(a)guesswhathia.no> wrote: >: >> >: >> the line is actually continuous and moving. I have only shown the tip >so you >: >> can see how far it travels. >: > >: >So what in the continuous "line" is it that is moving, Henri? >: >What quality of the light ray is your "tip of the line" representing? >: > >: >A small hint. >: >The phase velocity of light is c. >: >: No Paul. > >Yes Paul. Wilson is off his rocker, neither of you know anything >about Emission Fact. ....you're so drunk you're agreeing with Andersen now.... Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
From: Dr. Henri Wilson on 20 Oct 2007 22:03 On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 23:25:17 GMT, "Androcles" <Engineer(a)hogwarts.physics> wrote: > >"Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote in message >news:j5vkh352fclcpn5foofltrc9aba5n0na6j(a)4ax.com... > >The rays are never in phase, they have difference speeds. > >: It makes no >: difference if the wheel spins. The positions of the teeth are the same. > >These three wheels are all in phase all the time: > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/inphase.gif >These three are NEVER in phase: > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/nophase.gif > >Explain that, Wilson. What is there to explain? If you want to represent a ring gyro you have to make the top one rotate at ring speed and the lower two move at c+/- that ring speed. If it is supposed to represent a ring gyro in the rotating frame then it is correct but doesn't say a thing about the phasing of the rays because you haven't included the moving emission point.. Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
From: Dr. Henri Wilson on 20 Oct 2007 22:04 On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 23:44:51 GMT, "Androcles" <Engineer(a)hogwarts.physics> wrote: > >"Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote in message >news:fqvkh35v5u40616l3fba8vufksigdjdgsr(a)4ax.com... >: On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 15:17:36 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" >: >> ...George, the phases of rays emitted from ONE STATIC POINT when they >arrive at >: >> the detector clearly differ. >: > >: >What is the phase at the front of each of your rays? >: >Does it vary as the rays move? >: >: At any instant, the phase at the front of each moving line is indicated by >the >: teeth on the wheel....obviously.... > >These three wheels are always in phase ....obviously.... > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/inphase.gif >These three wheels are never in phase ....obviously.... > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/nophase.gif > >Explain that, faux Dr. Wilson. Get Tusseladd to help you, he >likes to say "obviously" too. go to bed.... Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
From: Dr. Henri Wilson on 20 Oct 2007 22:05 On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 23:44:51 GMT, "Androcles" <Engineer(a)hogwarts.physics> wrote: > >"Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote in message >news:tk0lh3l045j914i2bru14hvch37vst9abc(a)4ax.com... >: On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 13:59:53 -0700, Jerry <Cephalobus_alienus(a)comcast.net> >: wrote: >: > As a first experiment, I suggest letting the simulation run >: > for five seconds, then clicking once on the rotation rate >: > spinner (either up or down). After doing this, one one will >: > then see, to the right, a rapid, continuously increasing >: > displacement of the fringes until the total displacement >: > reaches slightly more than one fringe width. The fringes then >: > "snap back" to their original position (i.e. zero displacement) >: > since the light has had a chance to catch up. After reaching >: > steady state with a constant rotation rate, Ballistic Theory >: > predicts that the fringe displacement will be zero. >: > >: > Ballistic Theory is, of course, disproven once again. >: >: Give up Jerry. >: Your colleagues still cannot grasp the difference between 'the 'static >emission >: point' and the 'moving source'. >: They have become psychologically resistant to reason because the fact that >the >: emission point MOVES backwards in the rotating frame makes a complete >mockery >: of all their previous sagnac arguments against BaTh. >: >: The truth is revealed at: http://www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/ringgyro.htm >: and: http://www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/toothwheel.exe >: >: It gives the right answer...who was that fellow, Ockham, anyway? > >There wasn't one. Ockham is in Surrey and William lived there. > >You have become psychologically resistant to reason because >you are senile and cannot count. > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/inphase.gif > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/nophase.gif > >Give up, Wilson, the tick fairy cannot help you. No tick fairies needed. They are all employed by relativists anyway. > > Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
From: Androcles on 21 Oct 2007 04:52
"Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote in message news:ufclh3t17orodn08s8vgkr40j6ukj01lel(a)4ax.com... : On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 22:29:39 GMT, "Androcles" <Engineer(a)hogwarts.physics> : wrote: : : > : >"Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote in message : >news:psukh3d9oq3hkc7ol4ost9ehg7onmn20vu(a)4ax.com... : >: On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 15:13:27 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" : >: <paul.b.andersen(a)guesswhathia.no> wrote: : : >: >> : >: >> the line is actually continuous and moving. I have only shown the tip : >so you : >: >> can see how far it travels. : >: > : >: >So what in the continuous "line" is it that is moving, Henri? : >: >What quality of the light ray is your "tip of the line" representing? : >: > : >: >A small hint. : >: >The phase velocity of light is c. : >: : >: No Paul. : > : >Yes Paul. Wilson is off his rocker, neither of you know anything : >about Emission Fact. : : ...you're so drunk you're agreeing with Andersen now.... Andersen is agreeing with me, but he still doesn't know about Emission Fact and neither do you. You're so drunk you deny facts. |