Global warming?
in [Design]
|
From: Michael A. Terrell on 1 Feb 2010 18:13 Paul Keinanen wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:46:31 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell" > <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > > > > >Uwe Hercksen wrote: > >> > >> Michael A. Terrell schrieb: > >> > >> > It's 21 degrees in Ocala right now and expected to get colder. They are > >> > forecasting some snow, and this may become one of the longest cold > >> > spells on record with another cold front headed this way. > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> one very cold winter and you foget all the very mild winters of the last > >> decades? Wait for the winters of the next decades and the next very cold > >> one. > > > > > > Sigh. Do you know where Ocala is? Or that the entire region used to > >be full of citrus groves? Maybe you missed that they all froze out and > >died, after 150 years? Do you know 'anything' other than politically > >motivated BS? Do you ever think for yourself? > > There was a spectacular fireworks at Jan 28, 1986 some 160 km from > Ocala. > > This incident was blamed on freezing temperatures, causing leaking in > the O-rings. > > Contemporary news pictures showed ice dripping from citrus fruits. That was only a short freeze. They just reported that Marion County, Fl. roads suffered millions of dollars in damage from the long cold spell. Some roads are so damaged that you can pick it apart with your fingers. -- Greed is the root of all eBay.
From: Raveninghorde on 2 Feb 2010 04:45 On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:59:35 -0800, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:58:42 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell" ><mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > >> >>No damn way! >> >>It's 21 degrees in Ocala right now and expected to get colder. They are >>forecasting some snow, and this may become one of the longest cold >>spells on record with another cold front headed this way. > >http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/7111525/UN-climate-change-panel-based-claims-on-student-dissertation-and-magazine-article.html > >http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/01/28/save-rainforest-climate-change-scandal-chopped-facts/ > >John Peer review appears corrupt across other sciences as well as climate. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8490291.stm /quote It has also emerged that 14 leading stem cell researchers have written an open letter to journal editors in order to highlight their dissatisfaction. Billions of pounds of public money is spent on funding stem cell research. The open letter to the major scientific journals claims that "papers that are scientifically flawed or comprise only modest technical increments often attract undue profile. At the same time publication of truly original findings may be delayed or rejected". Two internationally-renowned researchers have spoken to BBC News about their concerns. They are Robin Lovell-Badge, from the National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR), and Austin Smith, from the University of Cambridge. Professor Lovell-Badge said: "It's turning things into a clique where only papers that satisfy this select group of a few reviewers who think of themselves as very important people in the field is published. /end quote
From: Uwe Hercksen on 2 Feb 2010 07:52 Jitt schrieb: > And in B.C., Canada, the warmest January ever recorded. > Oh, well Hello, well, good luck with the winter Olympics and enough snow... Bye
From: Uwe Hercksen on 2 Feb 2010 07:59 John Larkin schrieb: > So why do the warmingists cite every warm spell, hurricane, and beach > erosion as proof of global warming? Hello, one very cold winter and a temperature record of 150 years in one place does not proof that global warming does not exist. If the next decades are getting colder and the ice around the north pole is growing instead of shrinking, then we can talk of a probable end of global warming. Just wait and see, but do wait long enough. One cold winter is nothing. Bye
From: John Larkin on 2 Feb 2010 13:00
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:45:35 +0000, Raveninghorde <raveninghorde(a)invalid> wrote: >On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:59:35 -0800, John Larkin ><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >>On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:58:42 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell" >><mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >> >>> >>>No damn way! >>> >>>It's 21 degrees in Ocala right now and expected to get colder. They are >>>forecasting some snow, and this may become one of the longest cold >>>spells on record with another cold front headed this way. >> >>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/7111525/UN-climate-change-panel-based-claims-on-student-dissertation-and-magazine-article.html >> >>http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/01/28/save-rainforest-climate-change-scandal-chopped-facts/ >> >>John > >Peer review appears corrupt across other sciences as well as climate. > >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8490291.stm > >/quote > >It has also emerged that 14 leading stem cell researchers have written >an open letter to journal editors in order to highlight their >dissatisfaction. > >Billions of pounds of public money is spent on funding stem cell >research. > >The open letter to the major scientific journals claims that "papers >that are scientifically flawed or comprise only modest technical >increments often attract undue profile. At the same time publication >of truly original findings may be delayed or rejected". > >Two internationally-renowned researchers have spoken to BBC News about >their concerns. > >They are Robin Lovell-Badge, from the National Institute for Medical >Research (NIMR), and Austin Smith, from the University of Cambridge. > >Professor Lovell-Badge said: "It's turning things into a clique where >only papers that satisfy this select group of a few reviewers who >think of themselves as very important people in the field is >published. > >/end quote Stem cell research is another politics+emotion driven "science." Stems are treated as x-rays once were, a magical cure-all for everything. Have any therapies actually worked yet? The stem cell thing is of course a surrogate for the abortion debate. John |