From: Andy Hewitt on
Bruce Horrocks <07.013(a)scorecrow.com> wrote:

> On 21/05/2010 10:15, Chris Ridd wrote:
> >> Erm, Windows came out in 1985, but was really rubbish - did anyone
> >> actually use V1.0?
> >
> > I had to use Windows/386 a bit, which Wikipedia reckons was Windows 2.1.
> > 1.0 must have been *really* bad.
>
> I had the joy, once, of spending about 3 weeks trying to see if it was
> possible to program a GUI interface to the relational database that we
> were using at the time. The machine was a Compaq stuffed with *2MBytes*
> of extended memory, which was 'awesome' for the time. Needless to say it
> never worked - something to do with the RDBMS drivers expecting to be in
> High Memory and Windows shifting the drivers out of there into extended
> memory and then failing to emulate it properly, or some such. Oh the
> pleasures of developing under DOS.

I remember putting an extra 2MB into my Atari ST (I got the kit from
Evesham that added to the 512K, giving 2.5MB in total), that required a
new memory management chip, and some soldering onto the motherboard.

Mind you, once installed it did just work, and appeared as 2.5MB of RAM
to the system.

--
Andy Hewitt
<http://web.me.com/andrewhewitt1/>
From: Chris Ridd on
On 2010-05-21 14:04:14 +0100, Andy Hewitt said:

> Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 21/05/2010 11:12, Andy Hewitt wrote:
>>> Jim<jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote:
> [..]
>>> Yeah, it's one of those things that just didn't need fixing, IMHO.
>>
>> I am in the unique 'I don't mind it' catagory.
>>
>> But then I don't use office much, and when I do I use the 10% that is
>> easy enough to get from the ribbon!
>
> I find I either use the 2% that was in the old toolbar, or I need
> something obscure that's not in any of the toolbars/ribbons.

I'm baffled that people need toolbar buttons to do things like
copy/paste, or even save/print. The keyboard shortcuts for these have
been pretty standard for 20 or so years, haven't they?
--
Chris

From: Woody on
On 21/05/2010 14:07, Andy Hewitt wrote:
> Bruce Horrocks<07.013(a)scorecrow.com> wrote:
>
>> On 21/05/2010 10:15, Chris Ridd wrote:
>>>> Erm, Windows came out in 1985, but was really rubbish - did anyone
>>>> actually use V1.0?
>>>
>>> I had to use Windows/386 a bit, which Wikipedia reckons was Windows 2.1.
>>> 1.0 must have been *really* bad.
>>
>> I had the joy, once, of spending about 3 weeks trying to see if it was
>> possible to program a GUI interface to the relational database that we
>> were using at the time. The machine was a Compaq stuffed with *2MBytes*
>> of extended memory, which was 'awesome' for the time. Needless to say it
>> never worked - something to do with the RDBMS drivers expecting to be in
>> High Memory and Windows shifting the drivers out of there into extended
>> memory and then failing to emulate it properly, or some such. Oh the
>> pleasures of developing under DOS.
>
> I remember putting an extra 2MB into my Atari ST (I got the kit from
> Evesham that added to the 512K, giving 2.5MB in total), that required a
> new memory management chip, and some soldering onto the motherboard.
>
> Mind you, once installed it did just work, and appeared as 2.5MB of RAM
> to the system.

I hand installed mine. Ie, it was PC memory, so I hand wired it to the
board in kynar wire.

Worked in the end!


--
Woody
From: chris on
I'm surprised I haven't seen T I M in this thread? Hmmm....
From: Andy Hewitt on
Chris Ridd <chrisridd(a)mac.com> wrote:

> On 2010-05-21 14:04:14 +0100, Andy Hewitt said:
>
> > I find I either use the 2% that was in the old toolbar, or I need
> > something obscure that's not in any of the toolbars/ribbons.
>
> I'm baffled that people need toolbar buttons to do things like
> copy/paste, or even save/print. The keyboard shortcuts for these have
> been pretty standard for 20 or so years, haven't they?

Well, yes, they're not the ones I use in fact. Mind you, I still keep
trying to hit Command-C etc.

--
Andy Hewitt
<http://web.me.com/andrewhewitt1/>