From: Bill Sloman on
On Jan 25, 1:56 pm, AndyS <andysha...(a)juno.com> wrote:
> Andy asks:
>
>     I am considering switching from WINDOWS to UBUNTU, which is a
> Linnux
> based operating system.
>
>     Has anyone here had any experience with it or have any pointers
> that
> I should be aware of ??

SuSE and Mandriva both offer respectable Linux packages. SuSE's
package offers a lot of other software. Debian/Ubuntu has been the
developer's favourite for a long time now, but if your primary
interest isn't software development, SuSE and Mandriva might be worth
looking at.

--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen

From: AndyS on
Andy writes:

Many thanks to all who answered. It seems that UBUNTU is well
accepted
and a reasonable alternative to what I am now using.

I have ordered the CD (I only have dialup) and in a few weeks I'll
give 'er
a butcher's to see what happens. I still have a little self-education
to be
able to convert to dual boot, and that seems like the most reasonable
thing for me to be sure of backward compatibility.

Thanks again, guys. You've been a big help.


AndyS in Eureka, Texas W4OAH
From: Too_Many_Tools on
On Jan 25, 6:56 am, AndyS <andysha...(a)juno.com> wrote:
> Andy asks:
>
>     I am considering switching from WINDOWS to UBUNTU, which is a
> Linnux
> based operating system.
>
>     Has anyone here had any experience with it or have any pointers
> that
> I should be aware of ??
>
>               Thanks,
>
>                  AndyS  W4OAH

I am too.considering a switch.

What software packages DO NOT WORK with UBUNTU?

Thanks for any info.

TMT
From: JeffM on
Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>I am too.considering a switch.
>What software packages DO NOT WORK with UBUNTU?

If you approach Linux thinking that it is Windoze,
you are going to have problems from the start.
From: JeffM on
Tim Watts wrote:
>you can use Ubuntu (Gnome windows based), [its] sister
>Kubuntu (KDE windows/desktop based), Xubuntu
>(XFCE based) or the Netbook remix
>(perfect for flash based little netbooks like the eeepc).
>
....or Fluxbuntu, which is lighter than any of those
--and less graphical.

There is also an alpha release of Lubuntu
which uses the Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment (LXDE).
Some folks are watching that development with interest.

A bootable moonOS CD will also show you
the Enlightenment desktop in a *buntu environment.

The thing about desktops is that you can have as many as you want;
just choose the one you want at startup.

....and Linux Mint is *buntu
with a more complete out-of-the-box experience
(codecs, DVD support, fonts, Flash, Java, Adobe Reader...
--all the proprietary junk)
There are GNOME, KDE, Xfce, and Fluxbox editions
and an LXDE edition is in the works.

****There is also this which was recently released****
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Introducing-Ubuntu-Electronics-Remix-9-10-132890.shtml
It is DVD-sized.
Fedora has a similar CD-sized spin of their distro.