JSH: Prime gap equation consequences
in [Math]
|
Prev: An exact simplification challenge - 97 (hypergeom/EllipticF)
Next: e, pi and the 10th degree polynomial
From: JSH on 23 Jul 2010 23:28 Because I have a claim of having a prime gap equation it turns out that there are a LOT of things that must follow with that claim: 1. The prime gap equation settles the twin primes conjecture. 2. The theory with the prime gap equation must handle first occurrence of gaps, like when should you first see a prime gap of 100? 3. The theory with the prime gap equation then also handles maximal gap within a particular interval. 4. The prime gap equation has to accurately predict for ANY even positive gap. 5. The prime gap equation settles Goldbach's conjecture. So of course there are lots of places to attack such a claim!!! Which is why it's also a big deal for me to give a grace period. I actually am allowing some people their livelihoods. But I'm also curious about a world of billions of people who could be so limited with such an interesting area--primes. Can an entire world except me fail? Wouldn't it be more interesting to answer that question than any other? Am I the best out of billions? As if in a few years time I DO prove that an entire world of billions of people failed, except one, what might that say? If billions of people can't work out some simple results with prime numbers, what can they do, really? James Harris
From: featherlite on 24 Jul 2010 00:00 "JSH" <jstevh(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:347439bd-f68c-4f9a-9da0-60cf61795553(a)z15g2000prn.googlegroups.com... > Because I have a claim of having a prime gap equation it turns out > that there are a LOT of things that must follow with that claim: > > 1. The prime gap equation settles the twin primes conjecture. > > 2. The theory with the prime gap equation must handle first > occurrence of gaps, like when should you first see a prime gap of 100? > > 3. The theory with the prime gap equation then also handles maximal > gap within a particular interval. > > 4. The prime gap equation has to accurately predict for ANY even > positive gap. > > 5. The prime gap equation settles Goldbach's conjecture. > > So of course there are lots of places to attack such a claim!!! > > Which is why it's also a big deal for me to give a grace period. I > actually am allowing some people their livelihoods. > > But I'm also curious about a world of billions of people who could be > so limited with such an interesting area--primes. > > Can an entire world except me fail? > > Wouldn't it be more interesting to answer that question than any > other? > > Am I the best out of billions? > > As if in a few years time I DO prove that an entire world of billions > of people failed, except one, what might that say? > > If billions of people can't work out some simple results with prime > numbers, what can they do, really? > > > James Harris Does your prime gap equation generate the following table ? ( see http://www.trnicely.net/gaps/gaplist.html#MainTable for first occurance prime gaps ) ( see http://www.trnicely.net/twins/t2_0000.htm for enumeration of twin primes to 1e16 ) (see http://www.trnicely.net/index.html#TPG for list of downloads, ckout UBASIC too ) These examples are taken from [Nicely99]). For more information, see page on prime gaps. See also Nicely's table of prime gaps for a more extensive list which includes all of the known first occurrences of prime gaps--not just the maximal ones. Warning: there are two standard definitions of "gap". Let p be a prime and q be the next prime. Some define the gap between these two primes to be the number of composites between them, so g = q - p - 1 (and the gap following the prime 2 has length 0). Others define it to be simply q - p (so the gap following the prime 2 has the length 1). On these pages we use the former definition. Jens Kruse Andersen's page on maximal gaps and Nicely's pages use the second. ---- ------------------- ---------------------------- gap following the prime reference ---- ------------------- ---------------------------- 0 2 1 3 3 7 5 23 7 89 13 113 17 523 19 887 21 1129 33 1327 35 9551 43 15683 51 19609 71 31397 85 155921 95 360653 111 370261 113 492113 117 1349533 131 1357201 147 2010733 153 4652353 179 17051707 209 20831323 219 47326693 221 122164747 233 189695659 247 191912783 249 387096133 281 436273009 287 1294268491 291 1453168141 319 2300942549 335 3842610773 353 4302407359 381 10726904659 383 20678048297 393 22367084959 455 25056082087 463 42652618343 467 127976334671 473 182226896239 485 241160624143 489 297501075799 499 303371455241 513 304599508537 515 416608695821 531 461690510011 533 614487453523 539 738832927927 581 1346294310749 587 1408695493609 601 1968188556461 651 2614941710599 673 7177162611713 715 13829048559701 [YP89] 765 19581334192423 [YP89] 777 42842283925351 [YP89] 803 90874329411493 [Nicely99] 805 171231342420521 [Nicely99] 905 218209405436543 [Nicely99] 915 1189459969825483 [NN99] 923 1686994940955803 [NN99] 1131 1693182318746371 [NN99] 1183 43841547845541059 [NN2002] 1197 55350776431903243 Tom�s Oliveira e Silva 1219 80873624627234849 Tom�s Oliveira e Silva1223 203986478517455989 Tom�s Oliveira e Silva 1247 218034721194214273 Tom�s Oliveira e Silva 1271 305405826521087869 Tom�s Oliveira e Silva 1327 352521223451364323 Tom�s Oliveira e Silva 1355 401429925999153707 Donald E. Knuth
From: Rupert on 24 Jul 2010 02:25 On Jul 24, 1:28 pm, JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Because I have a claim of having a prime gap equation it turns out > that there are a LOT of things that must follow with that claim: > > 1. The prime gap equation settles the twin primes conjecture. > > 2. The theory with the prime gap equation must handle first > occurrence of gaps, like when should you first see a prime gap of 100? > > 3. The theory with the prime gap equation then also handles maximal > gap within a particular interval. > > 4. The prime gap equation has to accurately predict for ANY even > positive gap. > > 5. The prime gap equation settles Goldbach's conjecture. > > So of course there are lots of places to attack such a claim!!! > > Which is why it's also a big deal for me to give a grace period. I > actually am allowing some people their livelihoods. > > But I'm also curious about a world of billions of people who could be > so limited with such an interesting area--primes. > > Can an entire world except me fail? > > Wouldn't it be more interesting to answer that question than any > other? > > Am I the best out of billions? > > As if in a few years time I DO prove that an entire world of billions > of people failed, except one, what might that say? > > If billions of people can't work out some simple results with prime > numbers, what can they do, really? > > James Harris What exactly is it that you claim to have proved?
From: Usenet Account on 24 Jul 2010 11:17 "Rupert" <rupertmccallum(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:663090b6-8a4f-4755-84a6-20788c18acaa(a)x18g2000pro.googlegroups.com... On Jul 24, 1:28 pm, JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Because I have a claim of having a prime gap equation it turns out > that there are a LOT of things that must follow with that claim: > > 1. The prime gap equation settles the twin primes conjecture. > > 2. The theory with the prime gap equation must handle first > occurrence of gaps, like when should you first see a prime gap of 100? > > 3. The theory with the prime gap equation then also handles maximal > gap within a particular interval. > > 4. The prime gap equation has to accurately predict for ANY even > positive gap. > > 5. The prime gap equation settles Goldbach's conjecture. > > So of course there are lots of places to attack such a claim!!! > > Which is why it's also a big deal for me to give a grace period. I > actually am allowing some people their livelihoods. > > But I'm also curious about a world of billions of people who could be > so limited with such an interesting area--primes. > > Can an entire world except me fail? > > Wouldn't it be more interesting to answer that question than any > other? > > Am I the best out of billions? > > As if in a few years time I DO prove that an entire world of billions > of people failed, except one, what might that say? > > If billions of people can't work out some simple results with prime > numbers, what can they do, really? > > James Harris >What exactly is it that you claim to have proved? Nothing he posts. There is no math; only words. A horrifying void of nothingness. Even more boring that Inverse 19, Archie Pu, and Musatov. A complete lack of
From: JSH on 24 Jul 2010 11:22
On Jul 23, 9:00 pm, "featherlite" <noth...(a)spamless.com> wrote: > "JSH" <jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:347439bd-f68c-4f9a-9da0-60cf61795553(a)z15g2000prn.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > Because I have a claim of having a prime gap equation it turns out > > that there are a LOT of things that must follow with that claim: > > > 1. The prime gap equation settles the twin primes conjecture. > > > 2. The theory with the prime gap equation must handle first > > occurrence of gaps, like when should you first see a prime gap of 100? > > > 3. The theory with the prime gap equation then also handles maximal > > gap within a particular interval. > > > 4. The prime gap equation has to accurately predict for ANY even > > positive gap. > > > 5. The prime gap equation settles Goldbach's conjecture. > > > So of course there are lots of places to attack such a claim!!! > > > Which is why it's also a big deal for me to give a grace period. I > > actually am allowing some people their livelihoods. > > > But I'm also curious about a world of billions of people who could be > > so limited with such an interesting area--primes. > > > Can an entire world except me fail? > > > Wouldn't it be more interesting to answer that question than any > > other? > > > Am I the best out of billions? > > > As if in a few years time I DO prove that an entire world of billions > > of people failed, except one, what might that say? > > > If billions of people can't work out some simple results with prime > > numbers, what can they do, really? > > > James Harris > > Does your prime gap equation generate the following table ? <deleted> I've given three years "grace" for researchers in this area so I don't put up results. My position is that I can potentially collapse the resistance with the prime gap equation but doing so rapidly might push suddenly desperate mathematicians to physical violence. So I'm giving a grace period. James Harris |