Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 10 Nov 2006 07:37 In article <45535A1F.F229D5D9(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >Islamic societies are based on law. It is a law which uses the Koran as >> >> >its guide rather than the Bible but it is still law. >> >> >> >> And that law is currently being interpreted so that all people >> >> who are not Muslim must be killed. >> > >> >No it's not. That is a complete fallacy. >> >> You haven't been listening to the extremists, then. > >There's no point 'listening' to ppl like that. You simply can't take that stuff >seriously. People, who have a goal of killing you and yours, are not to be taken seriously? That's not how I work at all. > > >> I did not say that *all* of Islam has this interpretation. >> It doesn't, yet. But it's only a matter of years before >> extremists of all kinds will have weapons that can interrupt >> and destroy the world's trade. > >That's utterly ridiculous ! You are ignoring the current nuclear bomb arms race that is happening in the Middle East. What kind of reaction will the Arabs have when Iran has bigger weapons than they do? > >Say what you mean exactly instead of making vague allusions. I don't think I've been vague at all. > > >> Do you want to prevent this mess from happening or wait until >> it's in your lap. If you choose the latter, not only will >> you have the work to clean up the mess, you will also have >> additional work of trying to prevent it from happening again-- >> which will be impossible. > >The best way to avoid a 'mess' is to behave intelligently and avoid provoking >hostility. You are considered to be the equivalent of vermin in a certain interpretation of the Koran. You do not merit hositility since that would give you an equal standing. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 10 Nov 2006 07:59 In article <45535C91.5F6C3E61(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >unsettled wrote: >> >> Lloyd Parker wrote: >> >> > unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >> >> >> > Yeah, like a few million more Kurds is just what Turkey needs. >> >> >> >> I don't know what Turkey will do. I am the messenger. >> > >> >Turkey will do what they're told to do or lose out big time. >> >> Oh, the irony. > >The EU has a very big carrot and a very big stick. The carrot has worms and the stick has termites. That makes them useless to be used for their original purpose. Dang! I tied a knot in this thread :-))). /BAH
From: Michael A. Terrell on 10 Nov 2006 08:10 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > In article <0j17l2dnu2acrl45la9t243up4ctu00ebp(a)4ax.com>, > John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: > >On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 17:01:39 +0000, Eeyore > ><rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> > >>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >>> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> In addition, people burn the wood that is laced with arsenic. > >>> > > >>> >What kind of wood is laced with arsenic ? > >>> > >>> Any wood you want to prevent termintes from eating. > >> > >>I see. > >> > >>Luckily we don't have that problem here. We do get wood rot though. ! > > > >--- > >Yes, I've noticed that from your posts. > > Oh, stuff it. He's talking nice and you still have to slam him. > > /BAH You are only reading him in this thread. If you read more of his output to SED, you would understand. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
From: krw on 10 Nov 2006 08:22 In article <eivs1v$vor$5(a)leto.cc.emory.edu>, lparker(a)emory.edu says... > In article <eivd0d$8qk_021(a)s839.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >In article <%Ul4h.9702$r12.8296(a)newssvr12.news.prodigy.com>, > > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: <please snip> > >>In an ideal world, yes. However, you'd better open your eyes, because Bush > >>has been slowly dismantling a number of the checks-and-balances that the > >>Constitution sets up. Wiretaps without warrants issued by the Judicial > >>branch is one example. > > > >The last I heard that classification of wiretapping was checked > >by judiciary. > > Don't know who you heard, but Bush has claimed the right to wiretap without a > warrant. Only those calls coming from outside the US. That is, foreign intelligence. This has *ALWAYS* been legal without a court order. "Echelon", anyone? <please snip> -- Keith
From: jmfbahciv on 10 Nov 2006 08:20
In article <i5-dnVZNbt7jHc7YnZ2dnUVZ8tCdnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >news:eiv90t$8qk_001(a)s839.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >> In article <rA14h.8307$B31.443(a)newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>, > ><snip> >> If everything the Republicans said was to make me fearful, why am >> I not afraid? ><snip> > >You are. You are afraid of the world losing knowledge. I don't think that's fear. I dislike having to redo everything. > Of a big mess which >will take ten years to prevent. Of a minimum wage coming and causing a mess >in three years. Etc. Raising the minimum wage is stupid and insane. That's not fear; that pure unadulterated disgust. > >The funny thing is, none are realistic fears. You aren't afraid of the >really scary things. What do you think is a really scary thing? /BAH |