Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 10 Nov 2006 07:12 In article <9HG4h.11569$B31.1808(a)newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >news:eivamt$8qk_008(a)s839.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >> In article <BM14h.8314$B31.7002(a)newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>, >> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>> >>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>>news:eiq0h1$8qk_012(a)s900.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>>> In article <dGS3h.5355$7F3.3682(a)newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>, >>>> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>"krw" <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote in message >>>>>news:MPG.1fb9bd1d862e8abb989ab0(a)news.individual.net... >>>>>> >>>>>>> Dry wood burns very cleanly. >>>>>> >>>>>> It still stinks to hell. >>>>> >>>>>Not if you're using a good, modern wood stove, and good dry >>>>>(particularly >>>>>hard) wood. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I burn some in a fairly efficient stove, >>>>> >>>>>It's not just efficiency, it's also related to pollution control >>>>>devices. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> but unless there is a wind blowing it's a mess. It stinks if it's >>>>>> still, >>>>> >>>>>Not if you're using a good, modern wood stove, and good dry >>>>>(particularly >>>>>hard) wood. >>>> >>>> How do you make everybody do this? >>> >>>Why your desparate need to "make everybody do" things. Why not just let >>>them make their own decisions, and you make yours? >> >> Because there are never "do not burn" stamps on wood filled >> with arsenic. Because there isn't any pollution controls >> on burning wood. The ones who "sin" the worst are those >> who are rabid anti-smokers of cigarettes, consider the need >> for oil to be a mortal sin, and are against nuclear power plants. >> >> Yet these people have no problems with filling a whole neighborhood >> with smoke and arsenic. This is another example of perfection >> of inability to think. > >Why do you presume that it is the anti-smokers who burn pressure-treated >lumber illegally? That is a rather illogical, quite misanthropic, and >*very* disingenuous assumption. Why do you assume that I have no personal experience at all? It appears that, unless I can point you at some web site, you won't accept any fact at all. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 10 Nov 2006 07:14 In article <t9q6l29vs3eu6l4hii0h5l4duja5rqt80h(a)4ax.com>, Ben Newsam <ben.newsam(a)ukonline.co.uk> wrote: >On Thu, 09 Nov 06 13:33:17 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >>Yet these people have no problems with filling a whole neighborhood >>with smoke and arsenic. This is another example of perfection >>of inability to think. > >You know this for a fact, do you? It's only the anti-smokers who burn >arsenic-treated wood? Amazing. It was anti-smokers in my work area who boasted about burning wood and not committing the sin of burning oil. Guess what kinds of wood they burned? Anything that didn't cost much. My neighborhood had one guy who burnt his old deck wood. I was very ill. /BAH
From: joseph2k on 10 Nov 2006 07:20 lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > > "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message > news:dccf4$45528bce$4fe710f$18087(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... > >> You're entitled to pee all over the newsgroup as >> you have been doing. > > Dammit, I'm going to have to take a night job, at the rate this unsettled > idiot is making me keep replacing my irony meter. > > Eric Lucas If you are overloading on that trivial of input you need to terminate your vendor, with very extreme prejudice, say with a 188 howitzer. -- JosephKK Gegen dummheit kampfen die Gotter Selbst, vergebens. --Schiller
From: jmfbahciv on 10 Nov 2006 07:17 In article <81585$4553434b$49ecf67$23192(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> In article <e81a6$4551f94f$4fe75b2$14650(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, >> unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>> >>>>In article <MPG.1fb90e071de0287c989aa6(a)news.individual.net>, >>>> krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>In article <454F423C.3B207DEE(a)hotmail.com>, >>>>>rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>The days of inheriting a bicycle shop that grew into >>>>>>>>an airframe manufacturing enterprise are gone. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>No, it's not. >>>>>> >>>>>>Do please supply an appropriate example. >>>>> >>>>>Hewlett Packard, Apple, Mc$hit, Dell... Who knows where the next >>>>>one will pop up. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>He'll object to that because they're too old. Google, E-bay, >>>>Vehix(sp?). I can imagine a day where you login to General >>>>Motors and fill out the specs for the car you want and have >>>>it delivered in n days. I'd like to see this done with books ;-). >>>>IOW, mass production will become blase for anything other than >>>>computer equipment :-))). >>> >>>I object because they're not heavy industry. >> >> >> Now define heavy industry. > >Heavy industry is capital intensive and difficult to relocate. > >They have a number of effects on the economy among which is >a form of population and work stability (given demand for their >output is reasonably stable.) They tended to use a wide variety >of workers, from the lowest socio-economic classes to the highest. > >There are several general definitions of the term. Examples are >given at: > >http://www.answers.com/topic/heavy-industry OK. Thanks. > > > Do you consider chip makers heavy industry? > >No. Why? It seems to fill your spec above. > > > Or do you think that heavy industry are > > places where the workers have to get so dirty > > they can't wash it off. > >Are you looking for trouble? Of course. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 10 Nov 2006 07:18
In article <455370BA.E2A633A4(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >unsettled wrote: > >> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> > unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >> >> >>I object because they're not heavy industry. >> > >> > >> > Now define heavy industry. >> >> Heavy industry is capital intensive and difficult to relocate. > >Not impossible though. > >Asian companies have bought entire US steel plants and moved them overseas. What does that mean..."move"? Did they dismatle the furnace, move it and then rebuild it? /BAH |