From: jmfbahciv on 10 Nov 2006 07:21 In article <40J4h.161$Gw4.137(a)newssvr23.news.prodigy.net>, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >"unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message >news:81585$4553434b$49ecf67$23192(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... >> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >>> In article <e81a6$4551f94f$4fe75b2$14650(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, >>> unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >>> Or do you think that heavy industry are >> > places where the workers have to get so dirty >> > they can't wash it off. >> >> Are you looking for trouble? > >Ooooh! Pretending to threaten yourself. Nice believability strategy! When you find out that you are wrong about this, will you reexamine your other assumptions since you could be wrong about the other stuff we've been talking about? /BAH
From: Eeyore on 10 Nov 2006 07:27 John Fields wrote: > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > > >Your sense of scale is amazing. If the reason for the 2003 invasion was > >Saddam's Cease Fire Violations why did it take so long to invade? > > --- > We needed the time to get our act together, to announce what we were > going to do, and to wait for the world's reaction. What did " the world's reaction " have to do with it ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 10 Nov 2006 07:32 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: > >Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >>Luckily we don't have that problem here. We do get wood rot though. ! > > > >--- > >Yes, I've noticed that from your posts. > > Oh, stuff it. He's talking nice and you still have to slam him. Fields is a thoroughly unpleasant fellow. Graham
From: Eeyore on 10 Nov 2006 07:37 unsettled wrote: > Take a look at the Brit directed "peace treaties" at > the end of WW1 and WW2. They gladly handed over all of > Eastern Europe to Soviet slavery in order to have the > wherewithall to continue playing with their empire. Your own government is complicit in that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yalta_conference In nay case we weren't in aposition to hand over any countries. The Soviet Army was already there ! > WW1 was just as bad. Utter nonsense. Graham
From: Eeyore on 10 Nov 2006 07:38
jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >unsettled wrote: > >> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> > unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: > >> > >> >>I object because they're not heavy industry. > >> > > >> > Now define heavy industry. > >> > >> Heavy industry is capital intensive and difficult to relocate. > > > >Not impossible though. > > > >Asian companies have bought entire US steel plants and moved them overseas. > > What does that mean..."move"? Did they dismatle the furnace, move > it and then rebuild it? Yes. More than just furnaces btw. Graham |