Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 10 Nov 2006 09:15 In article <ej12bf$ms1$3(a)blue.rahul.net>, kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >In article <1ac67$4554024d$4fe76f5$27303(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, >unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >>Ken Smith wrote: >> >>> In article <f4p7l21a400mq09lf26tcq86s8gkv3q479(a)4ax.com>, >>> JoeBloe <joebloe(a)nosuchplace.org> wrote: >>> [....] >>> >>>> Name a foreign part in the M1 Abrams. >>> >>> >>> Q401 >>> >>> That was easy. >>> >>> >>Silliness, goofy behavior, excitability, inappropriate >>humor ... the first signs of bipolar disorder. > >Yes, I think you may be right. You should see a doctor, I hear that have >drugs for it these days. > >BTW: Those in the sci.electronics.design group will have understood the >joke more thoroughly than others. For those: Q401 would be a transistor >and it is very unlikely that there are no transistors in the M1 that are >made outside the country. Thank you. :-) You can't imagine the parts I started thinking about ;-)))...Keith could. /BAH
From: lucasea on 10 Nov 2006 09:22 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:ej1s4m$8qk_003(a)s995.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > > Of course I am. They are human and there is a possibility > one of them may reexamine his assumptions. We've been holding out for that possibility in your case, but sadly it appears you are unable/unwilling to do so. > If not, there are other > readers who may begin to think rather than repeat soundbites. Let's see....you do nothing but repeat Republican soundbites, and hope that they will fall to their knees and worship it because you said it? > That's (getting people to think objectively) is my agenda here. Need to look in the mirror first. >> I think it will >>take amother major disaster before they'll do that. Whereas, because there is no event that will end paranoia, you will continue to believe your claptrap in perpetuity. "The end is nigh! The end is nigh!" >> Even >>then the likelihood exists they'll blame the US. > > Of course they will blame the US. Why do you think these > posters have taken the stance that they have? Because the US has taken some indefensible actions. > If the > real mess makers are recognized, these posters will have > to deal with the reality of that; my current hypothesis > is that they can not. Not will not, but cannot. You might be right. The US government's actions have been major mess-makers in the Middle East in the past 4 years, and you cannot deal with that reality. Eric Lucas
From: Ken Smith on 10 Nov 2006 09:31 In article <oo88l259rk599m68c48bs9cbuje0263jf2(a)4ax.com>, Jonathan Kirwan <jkirwan(a)easystreet.com> wrote: >On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 05:22:55 +0000 (UTC), kensmith(a)green.rahul.net >(Ken Smith) wrote: > >>In article <1ac67$4554024d$4fe76f5$27303(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, >>unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >>>Ken Smith wrote: >>> >>>> In article <f4p7l21a400mq09lf26tcq86s8gkv3q479(a)4ax.com>, >>>> JoeBloe <joebloe(a)nosuchplace.org> wrote: >>>> [....] >>>> >>>>> Name a foreign part in the M1 Abrams. >>>> >>>> >>>> Q401 >>>> >>>> That was easy. >>>> >>>> >>>Silliness, goofy behavior, excitability, inappropriate >>>humor ... the first signs of bipolar disorder. >> >>Yes, I think you may be right. You should see a doctor, I hear that have >>drugs for it these days. >> >>BTW: Those in the sci.electronics.design group will have understood the >>joke more thoroughly than others. For those: Q401 would be a transistor >>and it is very unlikely that there are no transistors in the M1 that are >>made outside the country. > >Hehe. Don't forget that the 'bipolar disorder' is a great addition, >here. Common transistors are often "_bipolar_ junction transistors." Darn you. You took my straight line. I was going to post about collector base exchange. I'm posting from sic.electronics.design. A lot of the folk here would have known that the suggestion about the M1 was nonsense. -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: jmfbahciv on 10 Nov 2006 09:27 In article <455472DA.A35082C(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >unsettled wrote: >> >> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> > unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >>I object because they're not heavy industry. >> >> > >> >> > Now define heavy industry. >> >> >> >> Heavy industry is capital intensive and difficult to relocate. >> > >> >Not impossible though. >> > >> >Asian companies have bought entire US steel plants and moved them overseas. >> >> What does that mean..."move"? Did they dismatle the furnace, move >> it and then rebuild it? > >Yes. More than just furnaces btw. Was it frugal to move the plant bricks? I would think they would build their own. I know people moving things like enviromental chambers and such but they aren't moving the physical plants. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 10 Nov 2006 09:28
In article <45536295.5F90BB7F(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >" The days of inheriting a bicycle shop that grew into an airframe >> >> >manufacturing enterprise are gone. " >> >> >> >> Good grief. Pendantic. >> > >> >Seeking clarity. >> > >> >> Yep. Nowadays, nobody has to wait for >> >> their parents to die before making oddles of money. >> > >> >Most ppl aren't capable of making oodles of money. >> >> In today's global economy, lots more people have the opportunity >> to make lots of money. And they don't even have to think of >> something new. All they have to do is not spend what they make >> on expense items. > >If only it were that simple ! It is. /BAH |