From: Eeyore on


lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote:

> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message
>
> > Cool, 1000 sq ft in 15 minutes is getting closer to reality.
>
> Not if she actually cares about a clean kitchen floor, a clean bathroom,
> etc. All that 15 minutes really gets you is a cursory dusting, and maybe a
> quick brooming.

I suspect this in indeed the case.

Graham

From: Eeyore on


Jonathan Kirwan wrote:

> On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:08:57 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Check under UK's NHS, for example, how many die annually
> >of a superbug which came into being in hospital settings.
>
> I see you are just changing the subject. Okay. So let's go there.
> In the US, see:
>
> http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/healthDis.html
>
> "In hospitals alone, HAIs account for an estimated 2 million
> infections, 90,000 deaths, and $4.5 billion in excess health care
> costs annually."

The total number of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemias in
England in April to September 2005 was 3580. The corresponding figure for the
same time period in the previous four years was 3616 (2001), 3584 (2002),
3749(2003) and 3525 (2004).
The number of MRSA bacteraemias in the first four complete years of the
mandatory recording system were 7247 in 2001/02, 7372 in 2002/03, 7684 in
2003/04 and 7212 in 2004/05.

http://www.dh.gov.uk/PublicationsAndStatistics/Publications/PublicationsStatistics/PublicationsStatisticsArticle/fs/en?CONTENT_ID=4085951&chk=HBt2QD



The Office for National Statistics data revealed that between 2003 and 2004 the
mentions of MRSA on death certificates increased by 22% to 1,168.

It does not necessarily mean the superbug was the cause of death, just that it
contributed to it

MRSA was mentioned on two out of every 1,000 deaths certificates in England and
Wales, the statistics showed.

But it was cited as the underlying cause on 360 - up from 195 in 2000.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4742770.stm


So what else should I be looking for aside from MRSA ?

Graham


From: Michael A. Terrell on
Ben Newsam wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:44:32 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Ged rid of your middle class attitudes
>
> Workers of the world unite, eh?
>
> >Lucas lives in WV. Betcha he rubs shoulders with people
> >earning under $200 a week and doing just fine.
>
> I have no idea what or where WV is, unless it's an upside down VW.


West Virginia.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
From: JoeBloe on
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:28:04 +0000, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us:

>
>
>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>
>> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>> >Well, Eeyore, this would belie the assertion that she lives too far from a
>> >population center to get decent DSL.
>>
>> I live in a town. There is no DSL line strung.
>> You people are starting to get really annoying.
>
>DSL comes down an ordinary telephone line !
>
>Graham

Wrong.

ADSL REQUIRES a minimum of an ISDN switched POTS line.
That means that the customer's first switch has to be ISDN for his
area to be an ASDL capable area. THEN his Plain Old Telephone Service
line will do DSL.
From: JoeBloe on
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 02:53:52 +0000, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us:

>
>
>lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote:
>
>> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message
>>
>> > As a side note,what sort of surface area would a 4 bedroom house in the US
>> > have?
>>
>> NB she said 4 rooms, not 4 bedrooms. That would typically mean bedroom,
>> kitchen, living room and bathroom. That's probably on the order of 1000 sq
>> ft.
>
>LOL. My house has that area and it has 7 rooms.
>

It is funny that you guys pack seven rooms into 1000 sq ft of area.