Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Michael A. Terrell on 4 Oct 2006 11:48 Keith wrote: > > Meanwhile, the stuffed donkey will watch the documentary about the > wild west, "Blazing Saddles". He should pay close attention to the scene where someone punches out the horse. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
From: Michael A. Terrell on 4 Oct 2006 11:50 Jim Thompson wrote: > > I should know shortly what low-life job Eric has at Battelle... my > guess is janitor ;-) Are you sure they would give him that much responsibility? -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
From: lucasea on 4 Oct 2006 11:55 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:0k57i2df806cmetlmbcjn9q41bc2vfg6fm(a)4ax.com... > On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:05:09 GMT, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> Gave us: > >>I don't see you speaking out against racism in the US. Does that mean you >>approve of it, or do you apply different standards to others than you >>apply >>to yourself? > > You're an idiot. My family was directly involved with the > "underground railroad". If you have any brains at all, you'll know > that *that* made for more freedom in this country than just about > anything else you could name since. Immature insults aside, yes, I do know how much good the Underground Railroad did. Good for them, but I didn't ask about your ancesotrs, I asked about *you*? I am a direct descendant of Daniel Boone, but you don't see me crowing that I fought native Americans and conquered the US frontier. > I DO speak out more than a twit like you could ever know. Immature name-calling aside, don't you think MAYBE, just maybe, the leaders of moderate Muslim groups might be speaking out against terrorism, more than *you* could ever know? Eric Lucas
From: lucasea on 4 Oct 2006 12:01 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:7s57i2h1e9t48lv1d8i1jmfdm9kj4b9iis(a)4ax.com... > On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:09:12 GMT, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> Gave us: > >> >>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >>news:5pr5i2his5dccj9emaujrv65hmohk2j4h0(a)4ax.com... >>> >>> The real problem lies with the California version of a police >>> academy. They have no clue what is contained in the US Constitution, >>> and they ALL forget their oath five seconds after they utter it. >> >>Oh, you mean like freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and freedom from >>unreasonable (warrantless) searches and seizures? Yet you're OK when Bush >>ignores those? How about a little consistency in your views? Or do you >>just get on Usenet to insult and swear at people? >> > > You're an idiot. Show me where I posted a stand on anything about > Bush. OK, so what is your stand on his attacks on the Constitutional rights I listed above? < Also, name one US household he has sent government agents into > without a warrant. Well, since that's classified information, ya got me there, I can't give names and addresses.... However, the answer to your question is any household of which the phone has been tapped by the NSA. You're going to have to come into the 21st century and understand that searches include not only a physical search, but also electronic surveillance...or so common sense and the Supreme Court would tell us. Eric Lucas
From: Lloyd Parker on 4 Oct 2006 07:30
In article <MPG.1f8d91f2b6b5c0e8989d5f(a)News.Individual.NET>, Keith <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: >In article <efugkv$4up$3(a)leto.cc.emory.edu>, lparker(a)emory.edu >says... >> In article <nrc5i2tq8jr4k99aqofmbbesm7em13ktok(a)4ax.com>, >> John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >> >On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 18:28:11 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" >> ><nobody(a)nowhere.com> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker(a)emory.edu> wrote in message >> >>news:eftptn$c8p$2(a)leto.cc.emory.edu... >> >> >> >>> Tell me how many times the Bill of Rights says "people" and how many times >> >>> it >> >>> says "citizens." >> >> >> >>SCOTUS has said that even visitors have the rights of citizens when it come >> >>to legal processes. After all, you expect their homeland laws to apply in >> >>the US would you? >> >> >> >> >> > >> >Correct. But they also realize that the rights apply only when those >> >people are physically in the USA. Which is why some bad guys are held >> >elsewhere. >> > >> >John >> > >> > >> Well, Bush thought Gitmo qualified as "elsewhere" but the USSC said no. Then >> he held people in Europe, which is raising a stink there. It might keep some >> prospective EU members out even. > >Actually, no it didn't. It said only that Congress had some say in >the matter. > No, Bush claimed the detainees could not sue in US courts and the case should be dismissed. The USSC said they could, and heard the case. Not talking about the way of trying them; talking about the right to sue. |