Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Keith on 4 Oct 2006 10:52 In article <MMqdnSZ0oLqTC7_YRVnyiA(a)pipex.net>, usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com says... > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message > news:QQeUg.977$NE6.665(a)newssvr11.news.prodigy.com... > > > > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message > > news:XOSdncxhP5FZ_bzYRVnyvQ(a)pipex.net... > >> > >> "John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message > >> news:qsh2i2drpinua4j4gbg6utio5ap565jm4q(a)4ax.com... > >>> > >>> Yeah, like: "If we give you this money will you promise to use it to > >>> feed your people and not to make weapons with it?" > >> > >> Or "If we give you this money will you promise to use it to buy weapons > >> and fight [Insert Disliked Government of the Day] and promise never to > >> fight us - unless you really have to?" > > > > Oh, you mean like the Reagen and Clinton administrations did with Osama > > bin Laden when he was fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan? > > Sadly, yes. Another idiot heard from. <more garbage snipped> -- Keith
From: John Fields on 4 Oct 2006 10:57 On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 18:28:11 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" <nobody(a)nowhere.com> wrote: > >"John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message >news:cir4i2tom6isqqr383s16hn2h370nq1hg6(a)4ax.com... > >>>>>The US believes that US law applies everywhere in the world, but US >>>>>constitutional rights don't apply to anyone who isn't the 'right sort of >>>>>person'. >>> >>>> Preposterous. >>> >>>But still true. > >> Just saying that it's true doesn't make it so. >> >> Prove your point if you expect to be believed. >================================================ >Online Gambling Industry Reels After Arrest >Published: July 18, 2006 > >LONDON, July 18 - Europe's multibillion-dollar online gambling industry was >thrown into turmoil today after the United States government arrested the >chief executive of a British bookmaking company on Monday, leaving his >rivals scrambling to figure out whether they could be next. --- Running a gambling establishment which asserts a presence in the US is equivalent to the perpetrator being in the US and committing that crime here. Was the arrest not permitted by the UK? --- >================================================ >U.S. reels in major drug cartel leader Arellano Felix on fishing trip >12:31 p.m. August 16, 2006 > >SAN DIEGO - The third of three brothers long suspected of running one of the >world's most powerful drug cartels is in American hands, U.S. officials >announced Wednesday. >Javier Arellano Felix was intercepted Monday by the U.S. Coast Guard aboard >a sport fishing vessel off the southern Baja California peninsula. The >announcement was made in Washington by Deputy U.S. Attorney General Paul J. >McNulty. >When authorities got word that Arellano was aboard the sport fisher Dock >Holiday, about 15 miles off the coast of La Paz in the Sea of Cortez, the >U.S. Coast Guard moved in to intercept her in international waters, McNulty >said. --- I don't see anyone in a furor about it except the America-bashers like you, do you? I'm sure he'll be given a chance to exonerate himself when presented with the evidence that he committed a crime in the US by supplying illegal drugs knowingly for importation into the US. If he can't, we may even turn him over to his own government for disposal or, more likely, try him here and make him Noriega's cellmate. >================================================ > >So the US is arresting people who have not committed a crime in the US, or >people out at sea beyond their jurisdiction, and this is not piratical >behavior? --- As noted above, both of those individuals _did_ commit crimes in the US and, as such, are subject to prosecution under US law. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: John Fields on 4 Oct 2006 10:59 On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 18:28:11 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" <nobody(a)nowhere.com> wrote: > >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker(a)emory.edu> wrote in message >news:eftptn$c8p$2(a)leto.cc.emory.edu... > >> Tell me how many times the Bill of Rights says "people" and how many times >> it >> says "citizens." > >SCOTUS has said that even visitors have the rights of citizens when it come >to legal processes. After all, you expect their homeland laws to apply in >the US would you? --- ??? Learn to organize your thoughts before you write, Homer. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: Keith on 4 Oct 2006 11:13 In article <452390F5.E960000B(a)hotmail.com>, rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > >"T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message > > >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > > >>> T Wake wrote: > > >>>> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > > >>>> > > >>>> > This mess is about changing a mindset; either Western civilization's > > >>>> > mindset is changed or religious extremists' mindset is changed. > > >>>> > > >>>> I agree completely. > > >>> > > >>> How about removing the either and replacing the or with and ? > > >> > > >> Also an option. Any one of those three will work. > > > > > >I think the mutual concession option > > > > This option does not exist. > > You can't accept that Islam isn't a threat to your lifestyle ? Islam, yes. Radical Islam, no. ...and you're stupid to think so (but what's new?). -- Keith
From: Jim Thompson on 4 Oct 2006 11:17
On 4 Oct 2006 08:56:19 GMT, Robert Latest <boblatest(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >["Followup-To:" header set to sci.electronics.design.] >On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 15:31:34 -0700, > Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)My-Web-Site.com> wrote > in Msg. <f343i2p5aqlop09564hf9ef118p2pmf76q(a)4ax.com> >> On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 15:16:21 -0700, John Larkin >><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >>>You think they are guilty of criminal acts because they do not >>>publicly condemn Muslim terrorism? That's a novel interpretation of >>>law. Can we find you guilty of not condemming, well, everything that's >>>illegal? Better start condemming... you have a lot of catching up to >>>do. >> >> John, I don't think you are reading what I wrote. > >He has read you quite correctly. Let me refresh your memory on what you >wrote: > >Message-ID: <l9e2i2thg49gbrmpdu959id1mchkfv6f11(a)4ax.com>: >> My feeling is that if American Muslims can't/won't be outspoken >> against their extremist brothers, in an out-and-out world blow-up >> they'll be rounded up into camps just like the Japanese-Americans in >> WWII... deservedly... "silence implies consent" (Sir Thomas More). > >Message-ID: <7jj2i21m9ec0kg388bvffj3npa5tferpoo(a)4ax.com>: >> Since most (if not all) Muslims won't criticize Jihad, in a war we >> will have to presume that all Muslims are closet Islamic terrorists. > >You're talking about individual Muslims. Mentioning organisations >started later. > >robert And I still stand by the content of those two messages. The camps in Yuma are still there ;-) ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | | | E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat | | http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food. |