Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: unsettled on 24 Nov 2006 10:43 T Wake wrote: > "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:456659BB.4CBD9819(a)hotmail.com... > >> >>T Wake wrote: >> >> >>>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >>> >>>><usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >>>> >>>>>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >>>>> >>>>>><usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >>>>>> >>>>>>>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >>>>>>> >>>>>>>><usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> |||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>So who are you then? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>My moniker is in some listings. JMF's is in all the listings. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Stop alluding then. Tell us. Listings of what? This is USENET, as >>>>>>>>>it >>>>>>>>>stands, >>>>>>>>>based on your recent posts you are currently as believable as tj >>>>>>>>>Frazir. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As if a twit like you, resting only one notch above TJ Frazir, >>>>>>>>could >>>>>>>>judge anyone else. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>At least I, unlike you, am that one notch above Frazir. Even he >>>>>>>laughs >>>>>>>at your posts. >>>>>> >>>>>> You're an idiot. >>>>>> >>>>>> He can't even spell the words laugh, your, or post, much less know >>>>>>what they mean. >>>>> >>>>>Yet he still has you beaten hands down. Pretty sad really. I feel sorry >>>>>for you. >>>>> >>>> >>>> You need to stop looking in a mirror when you are thinking up your >>>>replies. It shows, terribly. >>> >>>Yeah, works well with five year olds - but that is about all you can deal >>>with really. You are pathetic, and as such, you really do have my >>>sympathy. >>>Hopefully one day you will be able to take your place as an adult in >>>society - but at the moment, that day is far, far away. >> >>I'm sure there must be some ppl in the UK as stupid and bigoted as JoeBloe >>but >>it seems at least they don't post on Usenet. > > > Sadly, some do. Androcles on news://sci.physics is a good candidate. Some of > the other newsgroups have examples of English bigots who are probably > posting from padded cells. > > They're coming to take you away......
From: unsettled on 24 Nov 2006 10:48 T Wake wrote: > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > news:ek707s$8qk_010(a)s989.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > >>In article <456702EC.9C246AC5(a)hotmail.com>, >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>unsettled wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Ken Smith wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>How many communist economies exist worldwide ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Zero if you round off to the nearest whole number. >>>>>> >>>>>>Maggot brain misspeaks again. China, Cuba, North Korea, >>>>>>and VietNam spring immediately to mind. >>>>> >>>>>You think China is communist ? >>>> >>>>Yes. They have developed their unique form of Communism. >>>>It is interesting to watch when they mix a little bit >>>>of capitalism in certain areas. >>> >>>Little bit ???? >> >>Yup. A very little bit. >> >> >>>It can't be communism if they encorage capitalism can it ? >> >>They are not encouraging capitalism in lieu of their brand >>of communism. They are trying out pieces of it. Their >>field test site is usually the area next door to Hong Kong. >>If something works, they move it to Shanghia. I am assuming >>that the pieces that merge nicely with their political methods >>will creep throughout its economy. > > > Which is why it isnt considered a communist economy (any more) by normal > people. Oh swell, now you're defining "normal people" which hadn't a legitimate definition in the first place, but of course you're making it suit your purposes. But you still don't have a handle on what the term communism means, so there's not a single thing you've got enough of a handle on to make a legitimate comment. >>These people do everything solidly. I saw a road being constructed. >>They dug down to the bedrock and then built the road up. This >>isn't done in "Western" places anymore. Too expensive and labor >>intensive. > > >
From: unsettled on 24 Nov 2006 10:49 T Wake wrote: > "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:4567044E.D1284DFF(a)hotmail.com... > >> >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> >>>Socialism does get communistic if the administration covers a >>>large geographic and/or population density. There isn't any >>>other way to "control" renegades who don't like to be told >>>what to do all the time. >> >>What nonsense is this now ? >> >>Where *do* you get these ideas ? > > > Not understanding what socialism means, and having a morbid fear of the word > "democrat" provide an excellent starting point for the madness. > > They're coming to take *you* away......
From: lucasea on 24 Nov 2006 10:59 "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message news:MtSdnXm0y5U4evjYnZ2dnUVZ8tOdnZ2d(a)pipex.net... > > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > news:ek47u9$8qk_002(a)s1002.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >> In article <456481AB.D9E20023(a)hotmail.com>, >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>>> lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: >>>> > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>> > >>>> >>>>What percentage do you think the government has to take? >>>> >>> >>>> >>>Medicare runs with about a 3% overhead rate. >>>> >> >>>> >>I don't believe this. That may be the Federal percentage. The >>>> >>state percentage also has to be included. >>>> > >>>> >There is no state % for Medicare. You're thinking of Medicaid. >>>> >>>> No, I'm not. Who sends the money? Not the feds. The feds >>>> send the money to the state who then disburses it. That is >>>> two political levels of bureaucracy. >>> >>>An 'NHS' doesn't have these problems. >> >> Once again, I'll ask you to think about administering your >> NHS to all of Europe. That is how the US has to work. >> We essentially 50 countries, each has its own politics, economy >> and different priority lists. > > It is a shame you have such a low opinion of the American people. It's also quite a shame that she has such a lack of understanding of the US Constitution, to think that no national program is possible. There are plenty of national programs in the US, and they work fine. Eric Lucas
From: lucasea on 24 Nov 2006 11:01
"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:77qbm29el5g5dfm6cmo0ve7d9che195e3g(a)4ax.com... > > Being a Usenet PlonkTARD is likely worse. Announcing your filter > file edits plants you squarely at the bottom of the barrel. Oh, you mean like Unsettled does? Eric Lucas |