Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: T Wake on 24 Nov 2006 10:26 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:ek707s$8qk_010(a)s989.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <456702EC.9C246AC5(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >unsettled wrote: >>> >> Ken Smith wrote: >>> >> > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> >>How many communist economies exist worldwide ? >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > Zero if you round off to the nearest whole number. >>> >> >>> >> Maggot brain misspeaks again. China, Cuba, North Korea, >>> >> and VietNam spring immediately to mind. >>> > >>> >You think China is communist ? >>> >>> Yes. They have developed their unique form of Communism. >>> It is interesting to watch when they mix a little bit >>> of capitalism in certain areas. >> >>Little bit ???? > > Yup. A very little bit. > >> >>It can't be communism if they encorage capitalism can it ? > > They are not encouraging capitalism in lieu of their brand > of communism. They are trying out pieces of it. Their > field test site is usually the area next door to Hong Kong. > If something works, they move it to Shanghia. I am assuming > that the pieces that merge nicely with their political methods > will creep throughout its economy. Which is why it isnt considered a communist economy (any more) by normal people. > These people do everything solidly. I saw a road being constructed. > They dug down to the bedrock and then built the road up. This > isn't done in "Western" places anymore. Too expensive and labor > intensive.
From: unsettled on 24 Nov 2006 10:26 T Wake wrote: > Far from the truth. All realistic scientists embrace GR, yet this does not > impede independant thinking. While it required independent thinking to propose the concept, it requires no independent thinking today to embrace GR. Just because you've thrown in a concept in the scientific realm doesn't make this tidbit of your logic any less muddy than it is the rest of the time. snip > Not true. You are simply continuing to find irrelevant ^^^^^^^^^^ > things with which to try and dispute other peoples findings. Seems to me you're projecting again. Look at the above.
From: unsettled on 24 Nov 2006 10:29 T Wake wrote: > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > news:ek6p19$8ss_002(a)s989.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > >>In article <45665CD2.DEFBB67F(a)hotmail.com>, >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>>unsettled wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Ken Smith wrote: >>>> >>>>>Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>How many communist economies exist worldwide ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Zero if you round off to the nearest whole number. >>>> >>>>Maggot brain misspeaks again. China, Cuba, North Korea, >>>>and VietNam spring immediately to mind. >>> >>>You think China is communist ? >> >>Yes. They have developed their unique form of Communism. >>It is interesting to watch when they mix a little bit >>of capitalism in certain areas. > > > Think about what capitalism is and how you cant "mix in a little bit" of it > to Communism and remain Communist. He thinks he knows something. He hasn't a clue.
From: T Wake on 24 Nov 2006 10:29 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:ek70b3$8qk_011(a)s989.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <45670324.DA07016A(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> > >>> >> I'm told >>> >> that a successful socialist economy is in Sweden. I have to study >>> >> that. >>> > >>> >It's called social democracy. >>> >>> I know. The fact that the word democracy has to be included gives >>> me a slight warning. >> >>And your fear of democracy doesn't surprise me. > > <ahem> The word democracy is included in a political party's name > for the same reason the word "science" is put into Computer Science > degree's name. This is your real bias. Social democracy is not a political party in this context (yes some countries have a "Social Democratic Party" but that was never an issue here). You bias is ensuring you are incapable of making a reasoned judgement about policies or foreign governments. Bit like saying that because the Irish Republicans spent thirty years bombing the UK, any political party with "Republican" in its name supports terrorism, violence and non-political methods of forcing people to obey it. Well, is that the case?
From: T Wake on 24 Nov 2006 10:30
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4567044E.D1284DFF(a)hotmail.com... > > > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Socialism does get communistic if the administration covers a >> large geographic and/or population density. There isn't any >> other way to "control" renegades who don't like to be told >> what to do all the time. > > What nonsense is this now ? > > Where *do* you get these ideas ? Not understanding what socialism means, and having a morbid fear of the word "democrat" provide an excellent starting point for the madness. |