Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 23 Nov 2006 21:32 T Wake wrote: > "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message > > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message > >>> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>>>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message > >>>>> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>>>>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message, > >>>>>>> |||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>So who are you then? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> My moniker is in some listings. JMF's is in all the listings. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Stop alluding then. Tell us. Listings of what? This is USENET, as it > >>>>>>stands, > >>>>>>based on your recent posts you are currently as believable as tj > >>>>>>Frazir. > >>>>>> > >>>>> As if a twit like you, resting only one notch above TJ Frazir, could > >>>>> judge anyone else. > >>>> > >>>>At least I, unlike you, am that one notch above Frazir. Even he laughs > >>>>at your posts. > >>> > >>> You're an idiot. > >>> > >>> He can't even spell the words laugh, your, or post, much less know > >>> what they mean. > >> > >>Yet he still has you beaten hands down. Pretty sad really. I feel sorry > >>for you. > >> > > You need to stop looking in a mirror when you are thinking up your > > replies. It shows, terribly. > > Yeah, works well with five year olds - but that is about all you can deal > with really. You are pathetic, and as such, you really do have my sympathy. > Hopefully one day you will be able to take your place as an adult in > society - but at the moment, that day is far, far away. I'm sure there must be some ppl in the UK as stupid and bigoted as JoeBloe but it seems at least they don't post on Usenet. Graham
From: Eeyore on 23 Nov 2006 21:38 Ken Smith wrote: > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: > [....] > >>Don't you just love infinity? It so impressive! The autor seems to have > >>confused socialism with communism. Many socialists are in favor of local > >>control. > > > >Local economic control. When the politicians begin to control > >the economics, the system becomes communism. > > You need to break open a text book or dictionary. Communism and socialism > are two fairly different concepts. Communist tend to work towards large > organizations and central control. Not all socialists do. > > Basically communists believe in "the efficiency of scale" like a religion. They're also not greatly into things like personal freedom whereas liberal/social democrats are. I doubt BAH can understand the concept of the mixed economy. Graham
From: Eeyore on 23 Nov 2006 21:44 unsettled wrote: > "Worst of all, the Swedes have not always acted benevolently, as > reported on page A1 of the August 29, 1997, Washington Post, > > "From 1934 to 1974, 62,000 Swedes were sterilized as part of a national > program grounded in the science of racial biology and carried out by > officials who believed they were helping to build a progressive, > enlightened welfare state...In some cases, couples judged to be inferior > parents were sterilized, as were their children when they became teenagers." Eugenics was once upon a time treated quite seriously. The idea was to avoid the birth of more handicapped kids. Hardly an evil goal. Graham
From: Eeyore on 23 Nov 2006 21:45 unsettled wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: > > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >>How many communist economies exist worldwide ? > > > > > > Zero if you round off to the nearest whole number. > > Maggot brain misspeaks again. China, Cuba, North Korea, > and VietNam spring immediately to mind. You think China is communist ? Bwahahahahahahahah Graham
From: Eeyore on 23 Nov 2006 21:48
unsettled wrote: > I don't accept that the US healthcare system is such a > disaster as several claim it is. I'm sure it's great for ppl who don't get ill. Graham |