Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: John Fields on 4 Oct 2006 15:30 On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 23:33:31 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >John Fields wrote: > >> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 16:05:58 +0100, Eeyore wrote: >> >John Fields wrote: >> >> On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:55:44 +0100, Eeyore wrote: >> >> >John Fields wrote: >> >> >> >> >> You're not, you're just a coward who's afraid to go out and do >> >> >> the bombing you'd really like to. >> >> > >> >> >Don't be so absurd. It sems you can only relate to violent ideas. >> >> >> >> --- >> >> Not at all true, but when I read your violent rhetoric I like to >> >> translate it into visuals which depict what you'd like to do if you >> >> weren't afraid of the reprisals. >> > >> >Show where I have espoused violence. >> >> --- >> I recall you said that you have nukes which you'd use to repel >> invading Muslims. That's pretty violent in my book. > >I said no such thing. Nor do I expect any invasion ! What a crackpot idea. --- Denying saying it won't make it not so. --- >> But read it again, genius. It says: "when I read your violent >> rhetoric". Do you deny that your rhetoric is violent? > >There is no violence there at all. --- If you truly believe that it's because intellectual violence has become so firmly ingrained in your psyche that it now seems commonplace and normal to you. --- >> >The only violently inclined ppl in this thread >> >are yourself, Thompson and Terrell. Violent even to the point of making personal >> >threats. >> >> --- >> Show where I made a personal threat. > >Can you not read ? 'even to' doesn't have to include you. --- Nor then does it have to include Thompson or Terrell, so who were you leveling the accusation at, specifically? Or are you going to try to backpedal your way out of this one, too? -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: Keith on 4 Oct 2006 15:34 In article <zKKdnSzN97hrlbnYnZ2dnUVZ8qWdnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com says... > > "Keith" <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote in message > news:MPG.1f8db9d68e963bff989d6e(a)News.Individual.NET... > > In article <%8RUg.8425$GR.1728(a)newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>, > > lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net says... > >> > >> "Keith" <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote in message > >> news:MPG.1f8d949b973606e3989d61(a)News.Individual.NET... > >> > > >> >> > Oh, you mean like the Reagen and Clinton administrations did with > >> >> > Osama > >> >> > bin Laden when he was fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan? > >> >> > >> >> Sadly, yes. > >> > > >> > Another idiot heard from. > >> > >> You don't believe that former administrations provided substantial > >> support > >> to two people/organizations who have subsequently turned against the US? > >> You need to read more, it's well-known. > > > > It's well known that the Quarterbacking on Monday morning is much > > better than that on Sunday afternoon too. What a maroon! > > What a response. You are truly at the cutting edge of debate Sir. It is an observation that happens to be germane here. Want another one? 20:20 hindsight is perfect. > As you don't really say anything except phrases used by others, can I assume > from this you think previous US administrations didn't train and equip Usma > Bin Laden and the Taleban during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan? No, I don't. OBL <> Northern Alliance. > Or are you just trying to impress your friends with the funny quotes you can > copy and paste? I've certainly impressed you out of your hole. -- Keith
From: T Wake on 4 Oct 2006 15:35 "John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message news:5db7i2d91g9i390qo6jqr3csbn7etevmsm(a)4ax.com... > On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 18:09:52 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > >> >>"John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message >>news:nfq3i21ho617f25tnndifm0hlhpmo5onul(a)4ax.com... >>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 01:58:29 +0100, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax >>> <dirk.bruere(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>Gordon wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 00:47:08 +0100, Eeyore >>>>> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> John Fields wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 19:59:42 +0100, "T Wake" wrote: >>>>>>>> "John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> So what? With world domonation as its goal, one would expect it >>>>>>>>> would strike world-wide, as the opportunity arose. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Whose goal? "It" isn't really appropriate to define the long term >>>>>>>> aims of a >>>>>>>> disparate group of organisations. Are "they" trying to dominate the >>>>>>>> world or >>>>>>>> destroy western society or convert every one or... >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> "It" being radical Islam, the goal, in my opinion, would be to >>>>>>> convert everyone to Islam and have them be subject to control by >>>>>>> Muslim jurists, the goal being total world domination by Islam. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Refusal to convert would result in death. >>>>>> Do you often conjure up such idiotic ideas out of thin air ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Graham >>>>>> >>>>> Graham, what John said is straight out of their Koran. Repeated >>>>> in many Surah, Ayah passages. For example; >>>>> >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> Surah 47, Ayah 4 When ye encounter the infidels, strike of their >>>>> heads till ye have made a great slaughter among them, and of the >>>>> rest make fast the fetters. >>>>> >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> For the record, an infidel is anyone who is not a recognized >>>>> Muslim in good standing. A Muslim who turns away from the Muslim >>>>> religion is an infidel. Any person who belongs to and >>>>> acknowledges belonging to any other religion is an infidel. >>>>> >>>>> Gordon >>>> >>>>Then how do you account for Iran having the second highest Jewish >>>>population in the ME? According to your theory they should all be >>>>Muslims or dead by now. >>> >>> --- >>> They are "People of the Book" and deserve respect. >>> >> >>As are Christians. Gordon did say "For the record, an infidel is anyone >>who >>is not a recognized Muslim in good standing." >> >>This implies that Jews, Christians, Hindus etc are all subject to the >>beheading. > > --- > Yes, but because of the small amount of respect eked out to > non-Muslim People of the Book, refusal to convert isn't an automatic > death sentence. For all others, AIUI, it is. > Ok, as I read it, you had stated Islam defines all non-Muslims as Infidels "Any person who belongs to and acknowledges belonging to any other religion is an infidel." Could it be that Islam is not as clear cut as posting sections of the Koran may imply?
From: T Wake on 4 Oct 2006 15:37 "John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message news:s2k7i2lbbpsdepbsu912116dvi0vpa6tcf(a)4ax.com... > On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 19:30:06 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" > <nobody(a)nowhere.com> wrote: > >> >>"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >>news:45229733.8D7D0F64(a)hotmail.com... >> >>> Reputedy Mohammed went a little ga-ga in his later years. Anyway, show >>> me >>> a religious text that*isn't* >>> riddled with contradictions. >> >>They're all really just books of magic spells anyway. > > --- > No, they're not. They're survival manuals. > Cool. Do they tell you which plants you can eat in the jungle? That has always impressed me in the survival books.
From: John Fields on 4 Oct 2006 15:36
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 22:34:28 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" <nobody(a)nowhere.com> wrote: > >"John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message >news:5cn5i2tfs8dhlbmarcltqii1bgcrggt3ou(a)4ax.com... > >>>Heck, even the UK sold arms to the Idonesians. Jet fighters in fact. >>> >>>That the US public could get so worked up over a minor sexual indiscretion >>>yet >>>not give a damn about killing tens of thousands of foreigners is very >>>telling >>>and a very depressing comment on the state of US society. > >> You pay _way_ too much attention to the media. > >What does Joe Sixpack pay attention to? --- Dunno, but if you're trying to emulate Homer Simpson, I'd bet you're a lot closer to knowing than you'd like to take credit for. Another Duff, Homer? -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer |