Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: T Wake on 4 Oct 2006 16:18 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:efvuff$8ss_005(a)s811.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <TnEUg.11174$6S3.3555(a)newssvr25.news.prodigy.net>, > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> >>"T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message >>news:VZWdnQZifpoHQr_YnZ2dnUVZ8tCdnZ2d(a)pipex.net... >>> >>> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:4522D468.BC853C9A(a)hotmail.com... >>>> >>>> T Wake wrote: >>>> >>>>> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>>>> >>>>> > This mess is about changing a mindset; either Western civilization's >>>>> > mindset is changed or religious extremists' mindset is changed. >>>>> >>>>> I agree completely. >>>> >>>> How about removing the either and replacing the or with and ? >>> >>> Also an option. Any one of those three will work. >> >>I think the mutual concession option > > This option does not exist. Really? Says who? >>is probably the most desirable option, >>as it avoids resentful compliance on either side (or at least it would >>spread the resentment more equitably.) > > You are suffering from wishful thinking that life is a fairy tale > and all will live happily ever after. > You watch too many action films.
From: Eeyore on 4 Oct 2006 16:19 John Larkin wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >Keith wrote: > > >> Meanwhile, the stuffed donkey will watch the documentary about the > >> wild west, "Blazing Saddles". > > > >I've never watched it. It's far too tedious. > > > >Graham > > Most of Mel Brooks' stuff is loaded with Hollywood insider jokes, > usually mocking studio fatheads. His "Robin Hood: Men in Tights" did a > nice job on Kevin Cosner. Like in Wodehouse's books, the plots are > just a framework to hold things up. I find the humour too juvenile for my taste. It's like finding farts funny and nothing else. Graham
From: T Wake on 4 Oct 2006 16:19 "Keith" <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote in message news:MPG.1f8dc2d64226c088989d71(a)News.Individual.NET... > In article <4523F72F.5B41BA26(a)hotmail.com>, > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >> >> >> Keith wrote: >> >> > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >> > > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> > > > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> > > > >"T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message >> > > > >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in >> > > > >> message >> > > > >>> T Wake wrote: >> > > > >>>> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >> > > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> > This mess is about changing a mindset; either Western >> > > > >>>> > civilization's >> > > > >>>> > mindset is changed or religious extremists' mindset is >> > > > >>>> > changed. >> > > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> I agree completely. >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> How about removing the either and replacing the or with and ? >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Also an option. Any one of those three will work. >> > > > > >> > > > >I think the mutual concession option >> > > > >> > > > This option does not exist. >> > > >> > > You can't accept that Islam isn't a threat to your lifestyle ? >> > >> > Islam, yes. Radical Islam, no. ...and you're stupid to think so >> > (but what's new?). >> >> And you think you can defeat 'radical Islam' with bombs and bullets ? > > I know there is no choice. Perhaps you want to submit? > Oh dear. Back to the very start point of this thread.
From: Daniel Mandic on 4 Oct 2006 16:16 T Wake wrote: > No way of knowing that for sure. Hitler's insanity contributed > heavily to his forces defeats. If they had a competent, sane, > commander in chief it may have gone differently. Hi T Wake! Bah... let Hi.l.. out of the Thread. I hope that that time will be the most worse human happening, for the time to come. A problem is, reminding it always. Like, we are a bit below, what have been happened. Being below, low or deep, the actions of Na... is not a free-card to do other violations. Best Regards, Daniel Mandic
From: T Wake on 4 Oct 2006 16:20
"Keith" <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote in message news:MPG.1f8d99ab23cb9137989d62(a)News.Individual.NET... > In article <452390F5.E960000B(a)hotmail.com>, > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >> >> >> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> > >"T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message >> > >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> > >>> T Wake wrote: >> > >>>> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >> > >>>> >> > >>>> > This mess is about changing a mindset; either Western >> > >>>> > civilization's >> > >>>> > mindset is changed or religious extremists' mindset is changed. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> I agree completely. >> > >>> >> > >>> How about removing the either and replacing the or with and ? >> > >> >> > >> Also an option. Any one of those three will work. >> > > >> > >I think the mutual concession option >> > >> > This option does not exist. >> >> You can't accept that Islam isn't a threat to your lifestyle ? > > Islam, yes. Radical Islam, no. ...and you're stupid to think so Aha, so the mutual concession option does exist then? |