From: Eeyore on 4 Oct 2006 16:41 Daniel Mandic wrote: > Keith wrote: > > > Right. I don't believe in any laws WRT guns. > > Hi Keith! > > What does WRT mean? It's an abbreviation for " with respect to ". Graham
From: T Wake on 4 Oct 2006 16:43 "Keith" <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote in message news:MPG.1f8dd1a463fccb53989d76(a)News.Individual.NET... > In article <IjTUg.51404$E67.14436(a)clgrps13>, nobody(a)nowhere.com > says... >> >> "Keith" <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote in message >> news:MPG.1f8db6b8105f0bb9989d69(a)News.Individual.NET... >> >> > Phones (of the domestic type, anyway) aren't tapped without >> > warrant. Get with the program. >> >> How would you ever know? >> > *You*don't know, so you assume thay are. Your tinfoil hat is > slipping. You _don't_ know so you assume they aren't. Interesting stand off. Have to hope the oversight committees have the same level of constitutional values you do, but even if they don't you will never know so the stand off continues.
From: T Wake on 4 Oct 2006 16:46 "Gordon" <gordonlr(a)DELETEswbell.net> wrote in message news:f948i2hten2esipbgta1dfg31r4omin64f(a)4ax.com... > On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 20:16:58 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >>"Michael A. Terrell" wrote: >> >>> Keith wrote: >>> > >>> > Meanwhile, the stuffed donkey will watch the documentary about the >>> > wild west, "Blazing Saddles". >>> >>> He should pay close attention to the scene where someone punches out >>> the horse. >> >>Your American Love of Violence is once again nnoted. >> >>Do you think that violence is the only way to 'win an argument' ? >> >>Graham >> > Looking down the other end of the tunnel...it seems being passive > and compliant is a very sure way to lose an argument. Theodore > Roosevelt had things sorted out pretty well when he said, "Speak > softly and carry a big stick." > Damn Ghandi and his crazy ideas - not to mention that fool Jesus. Look at how many arguments he lost in the long term.
From: John Fields on 4 Oct 2006 16:46 On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 23:11:29 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" <nobody(a)nowhere.com> wrote: > >"Gordon" <gordonlr(a)DELETEswbell.net> wrote in message >news:mbq5i29hg2qgun7p1rm5fpbdb6fr31ogvs(a)4ax.com... > >> Where did the current terrorism financing and materials come >> from? > >From the USA (oil). Unlike most every other conflict, the US is paying for >both sides in this one. --- I've always thought it would be interesting to see what would happen if the US sent troops to, say, Honduras to protect them from Guatemala and to Nicaragua to protect them from Costa Rica, and then Honduras and Nicaragua decided to declare war on each other. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: T Wake on 4 Oct 2006 16:48
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:45240DED.EC93F436(a)hotmail.com... > > > lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > >> "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote >> > On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:05:09 GMT, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> Gave us: >> > >> >>I don't see you speaking out against racism in the US. Does that mean >> >>you >> >>approve of it, or do you apply different standards to others than you >> >>apply to yourself? >> > >> > You're an idiot. My family was directly involved with the >> > "underground railroad". If you have any brains at all, you'll know >> > that *that* made for more freedom in this country than just about >> > anything else you could name since. >> >> Immature insults aside, yes, I do know how much good the Underground >> Railroad did. Good for them, but I didn't ask about your ancesotrs, I >> asked >> about *you*? I am a direct descendant of Daniel Boone, but you don't see >> me >> crowing that I fought native Americans and conquered the US frontier. >> >> > I DO speak out more than a twit like you could ever know. >> >> Immature name-calling aside, don't you think MAYBE, just maybe, the >> leaders >> of moderate Muslim groups might be speaking out against terrorism, more >> than >> *you* could ever know? > > Check this out. > > " Therefore SMC, with all its members and directors, condemns all forms of > terrorism and the oppression of human rights around the world, whether > committed > by Muslims, Christians, Jews or members of other faiths " > http://www.sufimuslimcouncil.org/aboutus.html > Sufis are a horrendously oppressed branch of Islam. Which is a shame as it certainly is the most entertaining to watch. (And historically provided the backbone of Islamic armies - no longer the case) But I am sure there are people in this thread who think Sufis are part of the great Islamic quest for world domination.... |