From: lucasea on 24 Nov 2006 23:42 "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message news:cda9e$4567862c$4fe7021$2731(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... >>>Lucas and Wake are, without a doubt, agitator class >>>Marxist socialists. > >> If so, you're so far right, you're a fascist. >> >>>Lucas keeps denying it, but all >>>the words and concepts are there from both of them. > >> Ditto, fascist. > > Ditto: meaningless hot button epithet Oh, you mean like "agitator class Marxist socialists"? Gutless hypocrite. Eric Lucas
From: lucasea on 24 Nov 2006 23:44 "John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message news:l61fm25jqrke4c7heeqn3m1690aj8h979i(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:43:36 +0000, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >>John Fields wrote: >> >>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >unsettled wrote: >>> > >>> >> Our post offices are also open till 5PM in most places. >>> > >>> >Is that supposed to be some kind of special US achievement ? Ours stay >>> >open later >>> >than that ! >>> >>> --- >>> That's because they're so inefficient they have to. >> >>Idiot. > > --- > Ah, I see I left you nonplussed and you had to revert to your > name-calling mode to respond. > > Congratulations. You have now dropped down a notch in the food > chain. And at one insult so far in this thread, that would put him many, many, many notches above you, unsettled and JoeBlows in this thread. Eric Lucas
From: lucasea on 24 Nov 2006 23:50 "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message news:97b81$4567983d$4fe7021$3341(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... > Lloyd Parker wrote: > >> In article <2edcb$4566330c$4fe7352$27010(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, >> unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >> >>>Ken Smith wrote: >>> >>> >>>>In article <4565B911.11BF2263(a)hotmail.com>, >>>>Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>[...] >>>> >>>> >>>>>How many communist economies exist worldwide ? >>>> >>>> >>>>Zero if you round off to the nearest whole number. >>> >>>Maggot brain misspeaks again. China, Cuba, North Korea, >>>and VietNam spring immediately to mind. >>> >> >> China and Vietnam are quite capitalistic. North Korea isn't communist as >> much as autocratic, more like czarist Russia than the USSR. So you've >> got one, Cuba. > > I don't understand how you folks have managed to > lose touch with the realities. I have 3: > > "In the 1990s a program of share-holding and greater > market orientation went into effect; however, state > enterprises continue to dominate many key industries > in China's 'socialist market economy.'" Hmm.... that says "socialist". You claimed "communist". Do you understand the difference, or do you just know that you grew up using both "socialist" and "communist" as pejorative names, not really understanding what either actually is? Nice basis for a discussion of an economic proposition. > "Government - Type: Highly centralized communist state. > > "North Korea introduced some modest wage and price reforms in 2002, and > has increasingly tolerated markets and a small private sector as the > state-run distribution system has deteriorated. But the regime seems > determined to maintain control." Need to learn the definition of communism. "STate control of the means of production". I don't see that in there anywhere. I see them wanting to control the means of distribution, but that's a very different thing, and much more akin to socialism. Eric Lucas
From: lucasea on 24 Nov 2006 23:59 "krw" <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote in message news:MPG.1fd184177442f6c6989c78(a)news.individual.net... > In article <ek7mtp$9d2$4(a)leto.cc.emory.edu>, lparker(a)emory.edu > says... > >> And I fail to see how providing food and medical care for children has >> made "a >> mess." > > Grow up and read history, if you're too young to remember it. Translation: "I don't have any real facts, so I'll just hurl a few explicit and implicit insults and hope nobody notices." Eric Lucas
From: lucasea on 25 Nov 2006 00:01
"krw" <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote in message news:MPG.1fd185d3c08ff28f989c7b(a)news.individual.net... > > Nope. Doctors would have lost their license for accepting money > for treatment. You see, that would be "unfair" to those without > money.. Evidence, please. Eric Lucas |