Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 25 Nov 2006 03:27 krw wrote: > lparker(a)emory.edu says... > > > > That's totally false. The Hillary plan was for a national single payer, not > > national health care. > > Nope. Doctors would have lost their license for accepting money > for treatment. I find that rather difficult to believe. Does anyone know the facts ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 25 Nov 2006 03:29 krw wrote: > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > krw wrote: > > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > > krw wrote: > > > > > lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net says... > > > > > > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message > > > > > > > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Once again, I'll ask you to think about administering your > > > > > > >> NHS to all of Europe. That is how the US has to work. > > > > > > >> We essentially 50 countries, each has its own politics, economy > > > > > > >> and different priority lists. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a shame you have such a low opinion of the American people. > > > > > > > > > > > > It's also quite a shame that she has such a lack of understanding of the US > > > > > > Constitution, to think that no national program is possible. There are > > > > > > plenty of national programs in the US, and they work fine. > > > > > > > > > > All (not operated through the states) are unconstitutional, as > > > > > well. None come close to 17% of the GNP either, though you'd > > > > > likely be all for nationalizing the oil companies too. > > > > > > > > What would be the point of that ? > > > > > > It makes as much sense as nationalizing health care; none. Why > > > don't you nationalize food production while you're at it? > > > > Who said anything about nationalisation ? > > What exactly do you think *NATIONALIZED* Health Care is? > > Dumb donkey! The NHS *does not* nationalise all health care. Private practice continues and GPs run their own practices essentially as they like. They simply receive a salary from the NHS. Graham
From: Eeyore on 25 Nov 2006 03:32 krw wrote: > lparker(a)emory.edu says... > > krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: > > >lparker(a)emory.edu says... > > >> unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: > > > > > >> >It is my opinion that we need the AMA or some other > > >> >similar organization to work towards improving what > > >> >we have. In my case the healthcare system has been > > >> >working well 99% of the time. > > >> > > >> Not if you're middle class, not if you're the working poor, not if you're > > >> unemployed, not if you work for a small business which provides no > > >> insurance... > > > > > >Should have graduated high school, eh? My son and his fiance both > > >have health care, at "middle/low-class" wages. Many don't have > > >insurance because they *choose* not to have it (why bother, they'll > > >get cured anyway). > > > > Oh BS. Not this right-wing "the poor are poor because they deserve it" > > idiocy. You really are cruel, uncompassionate, uncaring, and terminally > > stupid! > > For the most part they are responsible for their own plight. > Everyone in the US has at least two chances at a high school > education. Many choose to play rather than study. You're right. > I have *NO* compassion for them. Let them work at whatever they > can find. Tell me about the options for those with IQs of 80 or under in your scheme of things. Graham
From: Eeyore on 25 Nov 2006 03:34 krw wrote: > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > krw wrote: > > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > > T Wake wrote: > > > > > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > > > > > > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >>It [China] can't be communism if they encorage capitalism can it ? > > > > > > > > > > > > They are not encouraging capitalism in lieu of their brand > > > > > > of communism. They are trying out pieces of it. Their > > > > > > field test site is usually the area next door to Hong Kong. > > > > > > If something works, they move it to Shanghia. I am assuming > > > > > > that the pieces that merge nicely with their political methods > > > > > > will creep throughout its economy. > > > > > > > > > > Which is why it isnt considered a communist economy (any more) by normal > > > > > people. > > > > > > > > It's more like a mixed economy run by a party that still calls > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > itself communist. > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > > > Too funny! Dumb donkey. > > > > Pray tell what amuses you here. > > If you can't tell, you are a far dumber donkey than anyone here > ever suspected. ...and that's going a far piece! Right. You can't ! It seems to me that you placed some up arrows just to amuse yourself. You're an idiot. Graham
From: Eeyore on 25 Nov 2006 03:37
lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > >>"unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message > >> > >>>Lucas and Wake are, without a doubt, agitator class > >>>Marxist socialists. > > > >> If so, you're so far right, you're a fascist. > >> > >>>Lucas keeps denying it, but all > >>>the words and concepts are there from both of them. > > > >> Ditto, fascist. > > > > Ditto: meaningless hot button epithet > > Oh, you mean like "agitator class Marxist socialists"? Gutless hypocrite. He ought to meet a real Marxist ! Graham |