Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 25 Nov 2006 07:13 JoeBloe wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: > >> > > >> >In Canada, the provinces are really about as independant as the states in > >> >the US. > >> > >> Isn't Canada also under the UK? > > > >Canada's an independent country now ! I has been for some time in fact. > > > >Graham > > Do you mean to tell me that the Queen's visage is no longer on their > coins?! Oh my! It may possibly appear. They are still a member of the Commonwealth. Graham
From: T Wake on 25 Nov 2006 07:14 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:njcgm29v1n73d7r65ribfp11s16qqv87v4(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 12:06:17 -0000, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>I have complained about various departments in the government on several >>occasions. > > > The retard awakens. Go back to sleep, retard. Awww. Is that really all you can do? I thought you were better than having to repeat the same insult in a row. Still, you are pitiful.
From: T Wake on 25 Nov 2006 07:14 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:llcgm2lepv9nq8i8i01drkn0gdagk8d1jd(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 12:06:17 -0000, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >> >>Unsettled seems to think the US government is inherently corrupt and that >>it >>is not responsive to the will of the people. Odd really, as I thought the >>US >>was a democracy. > > The fact that you do not *know* tells a lot about just how little > you do know about the world, much less corruption in it, or the lack > thereof. Hahahahhahaha. Every post you make highlights how bad you are at basic reading comprehension. Bet you wish you studied harder at school.
From: Eeyore on 25 Nov 2006 07:14 JoeBloe wrote: > kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) Gave us: > >T Wake <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > > > >>Bit like saying that because the Irish Republicans spent thirty years > >>bombing the UK, any political party with "Republican" in its name supports > >>terrorism, violence and non-political methods of forcing people to obey it. > >> > >>Well, is that the case? > > > >A fairly good argument could be made if you assume: > > > >"shock and aw" == terrorism > >war == violence > >war == "nonpolitical methods" > > > >You should have picked a better example. > > The word is AWE, you dipshit. > > You should have picked an example that you at least know the > spelling of. Never heard of a typo have you ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 25 Nov 2006 07:16
T Wake wrote: > "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote > > krw wrote: > >> rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > >> > krw wrote: > >> > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > >> > > > krw wrote: > >> > > > > lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net says... > >> > > > > > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message > >> > > > > > > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> Once again, I'll ask you to think about administering your > >> > > > > > >> NHS to all of Europe. That is how the US has to work. > >> > > > > > >> We essentially 50 countries, each has its own politics, > >> > > > > > >> economy and different priority lists. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > It is a shame you have such a low opinion of the American > >> > > > > > > people. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > It's also quite a shame that she has such a lack of > >> > > > > > understanding of the US > >> > > > > > Constitution, to think that no national program is possible. > >> > > > > > There are > >> > > > > > plenty of national programs in the US, and they work fine. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > All (not operated through the states) are unconstitutional, as > >> > > > > well. None come close to 17% of the GNP either, though you'd > >> > > > > likely be all for nationalizing the oil companies too. > >> > > > > >> > > > What would be the point of that ? > >> > > > >> > > It makes as much sense as nationalizing health care; none. Why > >> > > don't you nationalize food production while you're at it? > >> > > >> > Who said anything about nationalisation ? > >> > >> What exactly do you think *NATIONALIZED* Health Care is? > >> > >> Dumb donkey! > > > > The NHS *does not* nationalise all health care. > > It strikes me that some people in this subthread are unable to tell the > difference between "National" and "Nationalised" and every time they see one > of the words it triggers the knee-jerk "socialism = bad" response. They've been well indoctrinated ! > Explaining that a "National" Health Service is a service which provides > health care nation wide on the basis of medical need not ability to pay > seems to be falling on deaf ears. There none so deaf as those who don't wish to hear. Graham |