Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 26 Nov 2006 04:17 krw wrote: > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > krw wrote: > > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > > krw wrote: > > > > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > > > > krw wrote: > > > > > > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > > > > > > krw wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It makes as much sense as nationalizing health care; none. Why > > > > > > > > > don't you nationalize food production while you're at it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Who said anything about nationalisation ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What exactly do you think *NATIONALIZED* Health Care is? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dumb donkey! > > > > > > > > > > > > The NHS *does not* nationalise all health care. > > > > > > > > > > > > Private practice continues and GPs run their own practices essentially as they > > > > > > > like. > > > > > > They simply receive a salary from the NHS. > > > > > > > > > > If they receive a salary from the NHS, their practices *have* been > > > > > nationalized. > > > > > > > > Not at all. That's a completely wrong connection. > > > > > > The boss is the government. The doctor is no longer controls his > > > practice. == nationalized. > > > > The doctor *does* control his own practice you numbskull ! The government / state / > NHS does not > > own the practices nor does it dictate any part of their day-to-day running ! > > Money => control. You can't be on a "salary" from the government > and work for yourself. You're working for the government, dumb > donkey. This is simply not true. Many practicioners do private work as well as NHS. In fact when the NHS was formed, the doctors made this very clear as part of their sign-up agreement. It's never been questioned since. There's no law saying you can only work for one employer. And you call me dumb !LL Can you not get this simple idea into your head ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 26 Nov 2006 04:19 unsettled wrote: > krw wrote: > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > >>krw wrote: > >>>rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > >>>>krw wrote: > >>>>>rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > >>>>>>krw wrote: > >>>>>>>rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > >>>>>>>>krw wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>It makes as much sense as nationalizing health care; none. Why > >>>>>>>>>don't you nationalize food production while you're at it? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>Who said anything about nationalisation ? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>What exactly do you think *NATIONALIZED* Health Care is? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Dumb donkey! > >>>>>> > >>>>>>The NHS *does not* nationalise all health care. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Private practice continues and GPs run their own practices essentially as they like. > >>> > >>>They simply receive a salary from the NHS. > >>> > >>>>>If they receive a salary from the NHS, their practices *have* been > >>>>>nationalized. > >>>> > >>>>Not at all. That's a completely wrong connection. > >>> > >>>The boss is the government. The doctor is no longer controls his > >>>practice. == nationalized. > >> > >>The doctor *does* control his own practice you numbskull ! The government / state / >>NHS does not > > >>own the practices nor does it dictate any part of their day-to-day running ! > > > > Money => control. You can't be on a "salary" from the government > > and work for yourself. You're working for the government, dumb > > donkey. > > I'll bet there are facility specifications that the doctor has to > comply with. I'm sure it's not allowed to be a hovel. Graham
From: Eeyore on 26 Nov 2006 04:22 krw wrote: > unsettled(a)nonsense.com says... > > krw wrote: > > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > > > > > > >>The doctor *does* control his own practice you numbskull ! The government / state / > >>NHS does > not > > >>own the practices nor does it dictate any part of their day-to-day running ! > > > > > > > > > Money => control. You can't be on a "salary" from the government > > > and work for yourself. You're working for the government, dumb > > > donkey. > > > > I'll bet there are facility specifications that the doctor has to > > comply with. > > > Not according to the dumb donkey. The doctor is free to do as he > pleases. He's on a salary with no controls. Where did I say his salary was uncontrolled you lying piece of pond slime ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 26 Nov 2006 04:26 lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > "krw" <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote in message > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > >> krw wrote: > >> > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > >> > > krw wrote: > >> > > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > >> > > > > T Wake wrote: > >> > > > > > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > >> > > > > > > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >>It [China] can't be communism if they encorage capitalism can > >> > > > > > >>it ? > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > They are not encouraging capitalism in lieu of their brand > >> > > > > > > of communism. They are trying out pieces of it. Their > >> > > > > > > field test site is usually the area next door to Hong Kong. > >> > > > > > > If something works, they move it to Shanghia. I am assuming > >> > > > > > > that the pieces that merge nicely with their political > >> > > > > > > methods > >> > > > > > > will creep throughout its economy. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Which is why it isnt considered a communist economy (any more) > >> > > > > > by normal > >> > > > > > people. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > It's more like a mixed economy run by a party that still calls > >> > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^ > >> > > > > itself communist. > >> > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > >> > > > > >> > > > Too funny! Dumb donkey. > >> > > > >> > > Pray tell what amuses you here. > >> > > >> > If you can't tell, you are a far dumber donkey than anyone here > >> > ever suspected. ...and that's going a far piece! > >> > >> Right. > > > > I guess so. You are far dumber than even I thought! > >> > >> You can't ! It seems to me that you placed some up arrows just to amuse > >> yourself. > > > > Think, dumb donkey. A controlled economy *is* communism. > > Uh, nooo.... Learn to read and learn just a smattering of economics. > Communism involves public ownership of the means of production. It is > possible to control the economy (price controls, etc.) with all of the means > of production being privately owned, run and controlled. A controlled > economy is not necessarily communism. > > > Controlled by a party certainly smack of totalitarian communism. > > Got it now dumb donkey? > > You certainly don't get it, so you might want to reconsider that > condescending attitude. Condescention seems to be the lying piece of pond scum's stock-in trade. Graham
From: Eeyore on 26 Nov 2006 04:32
Jamie wrote: > Eeyore wrote: > > > > > Jamie wrote: > > > > > >>Eeyore wrote: > >> > >>>T Wake wrote: > >>> > >>>>"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote > >>>> > >>>>>krw wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>>rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>krw wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>krw wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net says... > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>"T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>Once again, I'll ask you to think about administering your > >>>>>>>>>>>>>NHS to all of Europe. That is how the US has to work. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>We essentially 50 countries, each has its own politics, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>economy and different priority lists. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>It is a shame you have such a low opinion of the American > >>>>>>>>>>>>people. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>It's also quite a shame that she has such a lack of > >>>>>>>>>>>understanding of the US > >>>>>>>>>>>Constitution, to think that no national program is possible. > >>>>>>>>>>>There are > >>>>>>>>>>>plenty of national programs in the US, and they work fine. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>All (not operated through the states) are unconstitutional, as > >>>>>>>>>>well. None come close to 17% of the GNP either, though you'd > >>>>>>>>>>likely be all for nationalizing the oil companies too. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>What would be the point of that ? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>It makes as much sense as nationalizing health care; none. Why > >>>>>>>>don't you nationalize food production while you're at it? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Who said anything about nationalisation ? > >>>>>> > >>>>>>What exactly do you think *NATIONALIZED* Health Care is? > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Dumb donkey! > >>>>> > >>>>>The NHS *does not* nationalise all health care. > >>>> > >>>>It strikes me that some people in this subthread are unable to tell the > >>>>difference between "National" and "Nationalised" and every time they see one > >>>>of the words it triggers the knee-jerk "socialism = bad" response. > >>> > >>> > >>>They've been well indoctrinated ! > >>> > >>> > >>>>Explaining that a "National" Health Service is a service which provides > >>>>health care nation wide on the basis of medical need not ability to pay > >>>>seems to be falling on deaf ears. > >>> > >>> > >>>There none so deaf as those who don't wish to hear. > >>> > >>>Graham > >>> > >> > >>ah, you're finding coming to terms! > > > > > > IDIOT > > > I feel sorry that finding you're true self is causing > so much pain!. > As you have quoted many similar statements to others > "You really should go see some one about that problem" > Which brings to mind. Since your NHS is so great > as you keep saying, you shouldn't have any problems getting > help in all area's of your illnesses. IDIOT |