Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: lucasea on 25 Nov 2006 23:24 "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message news:e48cf$45688048$4fe7197$8995(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... > Any blind acceptance is a recipie for disaster. You mean like your blind acceptance of neo-conservative talking points? Eric Lucas
From: krw on 25 Nov 2006 23:40 In article <29671$4569168f$4fe76e6$12066(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, unsettled(a)nonsense.com says... > krw wrote: > > In article <45690236.179A2C4F(a)hotmail.com>, > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > >> > >>krw wrote: > >> > >> > >>>rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > >>> > >>>>krw wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > >>>>> > >>>>>>krw wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>krw wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>It makes as much sense as nationalizing health care; none. Why > >>>>>>>>>don't you nationalize food production while you're at it? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>Who said anything about nationalisation ? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>What exactly do you think *NATIONALIZED* Health Care is? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Dumb donkey! > >>>>>> > >>>>>>The NHS *does not* nationalise all health care. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Private practice continues and GPs run their own practices essentially as they like. >> > > >>> > >>>They simply receive a salary from the NHS. > >>> > >>>>>If they receive a salary from the NHS, their practices *have* been > >>>>>nationalized. > >>>> > >>>>Not at all. That's a completely wrong connection. > >>> > >>>The boss is the government. The doctor is no longer controls his > >>>practice. == nationalized. > >> > >>The doctor *does* control his own practice you numbskull ! The government / state / NHS does not > >>own the practices nor does it dictate any part of their day-to-day running ! > > > > > > Money => control. You can't be on a "salary" from the government > > and work for yourself. You're working for the government, dumb > > donkey. > > I'll bet there are facility specifications that the doctor has to > comply with. > Not according to the dumb donkey. The doctor is free to do as he pleases. He's on a salary with no controls. -- Keith
From: lucasea on 25 Nov 2006 23:51 "krw" <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote in message news:MPG.1fd258ebdd98c605989c97(a)news.individual.net... > In article <45680006.3E4EBB7(a)hotmail.com>, > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >> >> >> krw wrote: >> >> > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >> > > krw wrote: >> > > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >> > > > > T Wake wrote: >> > > > > > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >> > > > > > > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >>It [China] can't be communism if they encorage capitalism can >> > > > > > >>it ? >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > They are not encouraging capitalism in lieu of their brand >> > > > > > > of communism. They are trying out pieces of it. Their >> > > > > > > field test site is usually the area next door to Hong Kong. >> > > > > > > If something works, they move it to Shanghia. I am assuming >> > > > > > > that the pieces that merge nicely with their political >> > > > > > > methods >> > > > > > > will creep throughout its economy. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Which is why it isnt considered a communist economy (any more) >> > > > > > by normal >> > > > > > people. >> > > > > >> > > > > It's more like a mixed economy run by a party that still calls >> > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^ >> > > > > itself communist. >> > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> > > > >> > > > Too funny! Dumb donkey. >> > > >> > > Pray tell what amuses you here. >> > >> > If you can't tell, you are a far dumber donkey than anyone here >> > ever suspected. ...and that's going a far piece! >> >> Right. > > I guess so. You are far dumber than even I thought! >> >> You can't ! It seems to me that you placed some up arrows just to amuse >> yourself. > > Think, dumb donkey. A controlled economy *is* communism. Uh, nooo.... Learn to read and learn just a smattering of economics. Communism involves public ownership of the means of production. It is possible to control the economy (price controls, etc.) with all of the means of production being privately owned, run and controlled. A controlled economy is not necessarily communism. > Controlled by a party certainly smack of totalitarian communism. > Got it now dumb donkey? You certainly don't get it, so you might want to reconsider that condescending attitude. Eric Lucas
From: mmeron on 26 Nov 2006 00:13 In article <MPG.1fd2dfb217939e33989cec(a)news.individual.net>, krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> writes: >In article <45690236.179A2C4F(a)hotmail.com>, >rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >> >> >> krw wrote: >> >> > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >> > > krw wrote: >> > > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >> > > > > krw wrote: >> > > > > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >> > > > > > > krw wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > It makes as much sense as nationalizing health care; none. Why >> > > > > > > > don't you nationalize food production while you're at it? >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Who said anything about nationalisation ? >> > > > > > >> > > > > > What exactly do you think *NATIONALIZED* Health Care is? >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Dumb donkey! >> > > > > >> > > > > The NHS *does not* nationalise all health care. >> > > > > >> > > > > Private practice continues and GPs run their own practices essentially as they like. >> > >> > They simply receive a salary from the NHS. >> > > > >> > > > If they receive a salary from the NHS, their practices *have* been >> > > > nationalized. >> > > >> > > Not at all. That's a completely wrong connection. >> > >> > The boss is the government. The doctor is no longer controls his >> > practice. == nationalized. >> >> The doctor *does* control his own practice you numbskull ! The government / state / NHS does not >> own the practices nor does it dictate any part of their day-to-day running ! > >Money => control. You can't be on a "salary" from the government >and work for yourself. You're working for the government, dumb >donkey. > The Golden Rule: He who has the gold makes the rules. Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool, meron(a)cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"
From: lucasea on 26 Nov 2006 00:18
"krw" <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote in message news:MPG.1fd25cd82201f847989c99(a)news.individual.net... > In article <pMO9h.6329$yf7.4173(a)newssvr21.news.prodigy.net>, > lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net says... >> >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message >> news:HZidnczurMtWkvrYnZ2dnUVZ8tmdnZ2d(a)pipex.net... >> > >> > You bias is ensuring you are incapable of making a reasoned judgement >> > about policies or foreign governments. >> > >> > Bit like saying that because the Irish Republicans spent thirty years >> > bombing the UK, any political party with "Republican" in its name >> > supports >> > terrorism, violence and non-political methods of forcing people to obey >> > it. >> > >> > Well, is that the case? >> >> >> Well, two outta three ain't bad. >> > Of course an unthinking sock puppet would say that. ....which is what a person would say if they had no *logical* argument to disprove what I say, and need instead to try to dismiss me with insults. You're as lame (although not quite as hypocritical) as unsettled. Eric Lucas |