From: Michael A. Terrell on
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
>
> Whilst you are basking in your little utopia, may I remind you that your
> own history has been less then whiter then white? Slavery,


Delivered by British captains on British ships?


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
From: Michael A. Terrell on
Don Klipstein wrote:
>
> In article <4568E226.6C4193FE(a)earthlink.net>, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
> >Don Bowey wrote:
> >>
> >> Oregon has it's own medical plan.
> >
> > And a fine job they do, letting their mental patients run free to
> >make threatening phone calls to people. One has lost multiple ISP
> >accounts for threatening people online, been bared from the local
> >Wal-Mart, and arrested for trying to run over someone, as well.
>
> Are you arguing on basis of the actions of one person in the entire US
> "state" of Oregon?
>
> - Don Klipstein (don(a)misty.com)


Isn't one person making threatening phone calls to your friends
enough to show that their system doesn't work? Here are some of his mor
luciod posts: http://home.earthlink.net/~michaelaterrell/Dinius-02.txt
BTW, it is a huge text file, probably 8 MB or more.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
From: Phineas T Puddleduck on
In article <456A88CB.B0C01ED(a)earthlink.net>,
"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote:

> Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
> >
> > Whilst you are basking in your little utopia, may I remind you that your
> > own history has been less then whiter then white? Slavery,
>
>
> Delivered by British captains on British ships?

If you read the rest Michael, you would have noted I pointed out we all
have a stain on our history - that was the point...

--

Just \int_0^\infty du it!

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

From: Phineas T Puddleduck on
In article <456A8AF0.44406E4A(a)earthlink.net>,
"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote:

>
> Isn't one person making threatening phone calls to your friends
> enough to show that their system doesn't work? Here are some of his mor
> luciod posts: http://home.earthlink.net/~michaelaterrell/Dinius-02.txt
> BTW, it is a huge text file, probably 8 MB or more.

No. Because there is no such thing as a perfect system. The best you can
do is try to catch those who fall through. There is not one perfect
healthcare system in existence.

--

Just \int_0^\infty du it!

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

From: Spehro Pefhany on
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 06:41:28 GMT, the renowned "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote:

>Ken Smith wrote:
>>
>> In article <4568E61C.7E27585B(a)earthlink.net>,
>> Michael A. Terrell <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
>> >Ken Smith wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In article <MPG.1fd11c17f0518b5a989c65(a)news.individual.net>,
>> >> krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote:
>> >> [.....]
>> >> >Whether you like it or not, radio is an interstate issue. Perhaps
>> >> >there should be some local control for ultra=-low power, but other
>> >> >than that 50 FCCs would be a nightmare. Can you imagine getting 50
>> >> >certifications for a piece of gear?
>> >>
>> >> I like radio just fine.
>> >>
>> >> Is radio "interstate commerce" if the broadcast can't be heard in another
>> >> state? If not, I don't think the constitution gives the federal
>> >> government preemptive control.
>> >
>> >
>> > You can't keep the signal from crossing the state lines at night. I
>> >can hear radio stations from Ohio (700 KHz) and Tennessee (650 KHz) at
>> >night on the standard AM broadcast band. I can hear stations from most
>> >of the rest of the world on the shortwave bands. Not only is the RF
>> >spectrum controlled from the federal level, it is controlled under
>> >international agreement.
>>
>> Things like FM and 802.11 can be kept within the bounds of a state. In
>> that case, it is not "interstate commerce".
>
>
> Explain why WACX TV in Orange City Florida is required to block their
>signal from radiating out over the Atlantic ocean.

Are they actually required to, or do they just use a directional
antenna to optimize the signal strength where there are actually
receivers?


Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff(a)interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com