Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 27 Nov 2006 12:51 Ben Newsam wrote: > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > >"YD" <ydtechHAT(a)techie.com> wrote in message > > > >> So, have the lot of you reached a consensus, does jihad need > >> scientists or not? > >> > >> - YD, just throwing some spanners in the works. > > > >You need to give it a few more weeks. There haven't been enough posts to > >come to an answer yet. > > So, come on everybody! Get posting! We've a couple of thousand to go > yet! What's your target ? We're at 11,200 posts currently. Graham
From: T Wake on 27 Nov 2006 12:54 "Ben Newsam" <ben.newsam(a)ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message news:os5mm258otj31mf0sbj9lbdlrapuq4m7aa(a)4ax.com... > On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 17:48:44 -0000, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >>"YD" <ydtechHAT(a)techie.com> wrote in message >>news:l8ukl293srote1hpn3ipljupe27qggjbgl(a)4ax.com... >>> So, have the lot of you reached a consensus, does jihad need >>> scientists or not? >>> >>> - YD, just throwing some spanners in the works. >> >>You need to give it a few more weeks. There haven't been enough posts to >>come to an answer yet. > > So, come on everybody! Get posting! We've a couple of thousand to go > yet! Yeah, I think when it reaches the 100,000 posts mark we should have a consensus.
From: Eeyore on 27 Nov 2006 12:59 unsettled wrote: > Lloyd Parker wrote: > > > > Sure, and the USSC used that argument to uphold the feds overruling states > > which passed medical marijuana laws -- even if the marijuana is grown and used > > within a state. > > I don't mind of you smoke the stuff, your brain is mush > already. Just don't get caught. It's much better in food. Graham
From: Eeyore on 27 Nov 2006 13:00 T Wake wrote: > Over the years, I have worked with probably equal numbers of Americans, > Europeans and Brits who share this (IMHO) insane work ethic. Not all have > been royalty either. Royalty here seem to have quite long lifespans actually. Graham
From: JoeBloe on 27 Nov 2006 13:09
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 20:54:10 +0000, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >John Fields wrote: > >> I left out the Crusades, the Spanish Inquisition, > >Totally irrelevant. > > >> two world wars that we got dragged into > >You have this continual memory problem about WW2. > >Have you forgotten that Japan attacked Pearl Harbor ? > All that meant was that WE had two fronts, dipshit. |