From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >You reckon ex-mine workers are entrepreneurs ? All 100,000 of them ?
> >>
> >> Nope. You'ld need only a 100 of them to create new work.
> >
> >If that were true then each one of those businesses would
> >have to employ 1000 other ex-mine workers.
>
> Not at all. You don't understand how wealth is created. Those
> hundred would, not only create their own work, but a side effect
> would be other work that had to be done to support their business
> or deliver their business.

I'm sorry but that's fanciful nonsense.

Taking the motor industry as an example, outside sourcing may contribute say 3-5
jobs for every single one in the car factory but that's a very mature industry.

You simply can't make these analogies with small start ups.

Graham

From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >It would be an insult to miners to call them idle.
>
> When a union is on strike, the members are not allowed
> to find another job. They have to stand on the strike
> line and carry a piece of paper.

Not all of them did.

Still didn't do them much good.

You need to take those rose coloured glasses off.

Graham

From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >That's clearly not going to happen overnight ( or even in
> >the long term ) no matter how favourable the circumstances may be.
>
> There is all kinds of stuff that needs somebody to work on it.
> All you have to do is look and start working. My sister worked
> with a gal in the factory. The factory had a very high reject
> count with a particular part. This gal started her own business
> and offered to fix all the rejects of this part. She was making
> tons of money, had quite a few people working for her.

How many ?

100,000 ?

Graham

From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >jmcbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
> >> lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote:
> >> > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>Take a look at European nations that are blatant socialists.
> >> >
> >> >OK, Sweden. Saab, Volvo, Scania -- plenty of private enterprise.
> >>
> >> They're not private and they're not owned by Swedes.
> >
> >Stop lying please !
>
> I can buy stock of the manufacturers of those products.
> They are not private and they are not owned by Swedes.

What do you mean by 'private' in that case.

They're not state-owned are they ?

Graham

From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
> >> kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote:
> >> >
> >> >I got my flu shot. This time it didn't make me feel bad.
> >>
> >> I don't have to get the shot. All I have to do is breathe the
> >> air where the shots are being dispensed. I'm pretty sure
> >> a shot would kill me.
> >
> >Actually it would very likely improve your immunity.
>
> No, it would not.

How do you *KNOW* ? Are you an expert doctor in immunology ?

It seems as ever that you simply want to deny modern knowledge.

You're probably actually killing yourself by *NOT* getting a jab. But then
presumably that'll make you happy too because you'll be able to say some
perverse kind of " I told you so" !

Your behaviour reminds me of that phrase "cutting your face to spite your nose
". Or is it the other way round ? I think it is. I always end up mixing my
metaphors !

Graham