From: Eeyore on 28 Nov 2006 09:36 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >You reckon ex-mine workers are entrepreneurs ? All 100,000 of them ? > >> > >> Nope. You'ld need only a 100 of them to create new work. > > > >If that were true then each one of those businesses would > >have to employ 1000 other ex-mine workers. > > Not at all. You don't understand how wealth is created. Those > hundred would, not only create their own work, but a side effect > would be other work that had to be done to support their business > or deliver their business. I'm sorry but that's fanciful nonsense. Taking the motor industry as an example, outside sourcing may contribute say 3-5 jobs for every single one in the car factory but that's a very mature industry. You simply can't make these analogies with small start ups. Graham
From: Eeyore on 28 Nov 2006 09:37 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >It would be an insult to miners to call them idle. > > When a union is on strike, the members are not allowed > to find another job. They have to stand on the strike > line and carry a piece of paper. Not all of them did. Still didn't do them much good. You need to take those rose coloured glasses off. Graham
From: Eeyore on 28 Nov 2006 09:42 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >That's clearly not going to happen overnight ( or even in > >the long term ) no matter how favourable the circumstances may be. > > There is all kinds of stuff that needs somebody to work on it. > All you have to do is look and start working. My sister worked > with a gal in the factory. The factory had a very high reject > count with a particular part. This gal started her own business > and offered to fix all the rejects of this part. She was making > tons of money, had quite a few people working for her. How many ? 100,000 ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 28 Nov 2006 09:43 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >jmcbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: > >> > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> >> > >> >>Take a look at European nations that are blatant socialists. > >> > > >> >OK, Sweden. Saab, Volvo, Scania -- plenty of private enterprise. > >> > >> They're not private and they're not owned by Swedes. > > > >Stop lying please ! > > I can buy stock of the manufacturers of those products. > They are not private and they are not owned by Swedes. What do you mean by 'private' in that case. They're not state-owned are they ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 28 Nov 2006 09:47
jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: > >> > > >> >I got my flu shot. This time it didn't make me feel bad. > >> > >> I don't have to get the shot. All I have to do is breathe the > >> air where the shots are being dispensed. I'm pretty sure > >> a shot would kill me. > > > >Actually it would very likely improve your immunity. > > No, it would not. How do you *KNOW* ? Are you an expert doctor in immunology ? It seems as ever that you simply want to deny modern knowledge. You're probably actually killing yourself by *NOT* getting a jab. But then presumably that'll make you happy too because you'll be able to say some perverse kind of " I told you so" ! Your behaviour reminds me of that phrase "cutting your face to spite your nose ". Or is it the other way round ? I think it is. I always end up mixing my metaphors ! Graham |