Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: krw on 28 Nov 2006 13:22 In article <lfqah.565$Py2.130(a)newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>, lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net says... > > "krw" <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote in message > news:MPG.1fd3837039f50c1a989cfd(a)news.individual.net... > > In article <Craah.15803$9v5.14513(a)newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>, > > lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net says... > >> > >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > >> news:4568EDE9.72E1B5ED(a)hotmail.com... > >> > > >> > > >> > krw wrote: > >> > > >> >> Health care is not in the COnstitution as a federal power > >> > > >> > Are you always going to let a historical document rule your lives as if > >> > nothing > >> > had changed ? > >> > >> In any case, he's simply wrong. Article V can easily be interpreted to > >> include health care, if one isn't prejudiced to preclude it in the first > >> place. > > > > Only by a leftist loon. Looking around in those penumbras again, > > eh lefty? > > You have nothing more intelligent to add, so you try to use insults to bring > me down to your level. Nice try. Nope, observation. Leftist loons can read abortion rights into a chocolate chip cookie recipe and the Great Society into the Constitution. You don=3Ft really care what the original intent was. -- Keith
From: Eeyore on 28 Nov 2006 13:27 John Fields wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > >> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker(a)emory.edu> wrote in message > >> > > >> >> Powerful minority parties were an > >> >>anathema to them, as is seen now in parliamentary systems. > >> > >> Not at all. They saw the problems in England with a two-party system, and > >> at least some felt they could be solved with multiple parties. > > > >Funny how it's turned out now then ! > > --- > Why? We naturally gravitate to diametrical opposites. From time > immemorial to the present we've had our time subdivided into night > and day. From that we have evolved into creatures with symmetrical > external bodies with mirror-image left and right sides. We also > have good and evil, one and zero, right and wrong, republicans and > democrats... So you guys have a 2 party system and we have a multi-party system. In any case, the party system is broken now. Here at least. It may take some time for you guys to catch up. Graham
From: Eeyore on 28 Nov 2006 13:28 krw wrote: > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > krw wrote: > > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > > krw wrote: > > > > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > > > > krw wrote: > > > > > > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I do wish you'd use a proper sig. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why ? Is my name not good enough ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't care what you put in it, use a proper sig separator. Not > > > > > > > doing so makes you no better than a top-poster. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Keith > > > > > > > > > > > > What exactly is the big deal with that ? > > > > > > > > > > I see. You are no better than a pig-ignorant top-poster. > > > > > > > > You're incapable of explaining yourself is what I see. > > > > > > Dumb donkey, just follow the accepted Usenet standards. Trust me, > > > there are reasons for them. > > > > Feel free to offer a reason for this one. > > Software expects the sig separator so the sig can be snipped from > responses. Not my software for sure. Graham
From: Eeyore on 28 Nov 2006 13:29 krw wrote: > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > krw wrote: > > >lparker(a)emory.edu says... > > > > > > > > OK, Sweden. Saab, Volvo, Scania -- plenty of private enterprise. > > > > > > > > > You do know that Saab is owned by GM and Volvo by Ford? > > > > GM and Ford are communist ? > > Given the labor unions influence, I=3Fm not so sure... > > But the word for today is =3Fsocialist=3F. Stop moving the goal posts, > dumb donkey. So, GM and Ford are socialist ? Graham
From: krw on 28 Nov 2006 13:53
In article <456C7FCA.1371A2EF(a)hotmail.com>, rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > krw wrote: > > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > krw wrote: > > > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > > > krw wrote: > > > > > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > > > > > krw wrote: > > > > > > > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I do wish you'd use a proper sig. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why ? Is my name not good enough ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't care what you put in it, use a proper sig separator. Not > > > > > > > > doing so makes you no better than a top-poster. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Keith > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What exactly is the big deal with that ? > > > > > > > > > > > > I see. You are no better than a pig-ignorant top-poster. > > > > > > > > > > You're incapable of explaining yourself is what I see. > > > > > > > > Dumb donkey, just follow the accepted Usenet standards. Trust me, > > > > there are reasons for them. > > > > > > Feel free to offer a reason for this one. > > > > Software expects the sig separator so the sig can be snipped from > > responses. > > Not my software for sure. Why doesn=3Ft it surprise me that you only think of yourself? -- Keith |