Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 28 Nov 2006 12:49 John Fields wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >John Fields wrote: > > > >> LOL, I've never denied that I was anything _but_ a troll. > > > >Just wanted to hear that from the horse's mouth. > > --- > Lucky you! Everything I hear from you comes from the other end. Bwaahhahahahahahahahahaha
From: John Fields on 28 Nov 2006 12:53 On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:14:44 +0000, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > >> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker(a)emory.edu> wrote in message >> > >> >> Powerful minority parties were an >> >>anathema to them, as is seen now in parliamentary systems. >> >> Not at all. They saw the problems in England with a two-party system, and >> at least some felt they could be solved with multiple parties. > >Funny how it's turned out now then ! --- Why? We naturally gravitate to diametrical opposites. From time immemorial to the present we've had our time subdivided into night and day. From that we have evolved into creatures with symmetrical external bodies with mirror-image left and right sides. We also have good and evil, one and zero, right and wrong, republicans and democrats... -- JF
From: krw on 28 Nov 2006 13:00 In article <456BF0FB.23A65686(a)hotmail.com>, rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > krw wrote: > > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > krw wrote: > > > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > > > krw wrote: > > > > > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I do wish you'd use a proper sig. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why ? Is my name not good enough ? > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't care what you put in it, use a proper sig separator. Not > > > > > > doing so makes you no better than a top-poster. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Keith > > > > > > > > > > What exactly is the big deal with that ? > > > > > > > > I see. You are no better than a pig-ignorant top-poster. > > > > > > You're incapable of explaining yourself is what I see. > > > > Dumb donkey, just follow the accepted Usenet standards. Trust me, > > there are reasons for them. > > Feel free to offer a reason for this one. Software expects the sig separator so the sig can be snipped from responses. > > > To do otherwise simply tells the > > world; " I care more about my 'individualism' than I care about > > conversation". A proper sig-separator isn't all that hard to do. > > I'm sure it's not, but *what's the point of it* ? So you don=3Ft follow conventions because =3FI don=3Ft have to; neener neener=3F. How grown up of you. -- Keith
From: krw on 28 Nov 2006 13:08 In article <456BF201.21691A60(a)hotmail.com>, rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > krw wrote: > > > In article <ekf023$abg$2(a)leto.cc.emory.edu>, lparker(a)emory.edu > > says... > > > > > > OK, Sweden. Saab, Volvo, Scania -- plenty of private enterprise. > > > > > > You do know that Saab is owned by GM and Volvo by Ford? > > GM and Ford are communist ? Given the labor unions influence, I=3Fm not so sure... But the word for today is =3Fsocialist=3F. Stop moving the goal posts, dumb donkey. -- Keith
From: krw on 28 Nov 2006 13:13
In article <ekhjge$pkt$8(a)blue.rahul.net>, kensmith(a)green.rahul.net says... > In article <MPG.1fd57546bd40b365989d18(a)news.individual.net>, > krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: > [....] > >> And there's also the argument that health care does, too. A pandemic that > >> starts in one state will affect the ability of people to travel to and from > >> that state, perhpas due to quarantine, perhaps due to simple fear. > > > >...and you better believe the USG will take over control of that > >pandemic, right down to shutting down interstate transport and even > >guarantying entire states, if need be. > > > >At that point it does become an interstate issue. Your sniffles > >aren't. > > That FM station in San Fransisco is not a interstate issue. The FCC has > absolutely no right to control it. The entire FCC is completely > unconstitutional. So you expect to map all possible interference patterns and let the states regulate those the can=3Ft, maybe... Please grow up! The FCC was formed when all radio transmission was interstate in nature. Also given the treaty implications radio transmission *must* be federally controlled. -- Keith |