Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 29 Nov 2006 07:58 In article <456C4C00.BC0EFE52(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >> >> > >> >> >I got my flu shot. This time it didn't make me feel bad. >> >> >> >> I don't have to get the shot. All I have to do is breathe the >> >> air where the shots are being dispensed. I'm pretty sure >> >> a shot would kill me. >> > >> >Actually it would very likely improve your immunity. >> >> No, it would not. > >How do you *KNOW* ? Are you an expert doctor in immunology ? I am an expert in the disease I have. > >It seems as ever that you simply want to deny modern knowledge. Why do you think that there are restrictions w.r.t. who should not get a flu shot? <snip> /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 29 Nov 2006 08:09 In article <456D7544.F1CC4D6D(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >John Fields wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >John Fields wrote: >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >krw wrote: >> >> >> rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >> > >> >> >> > In any case, the party system is broken now. Here at least. It may take some >> >> >> > time for you guys to catch up. >> >> >> >> >> >> Not going to change without a new Constitution. >> >> > >> >> >If that's what it takes..... >> >> >> >> --- >> >> It's not going to happen. We've gotten to the top of the heap with >> >> our Constitution and it's not likely we're going to abandon it for >> >> something as silly as pie in the sky. >> > >> >For ever ? >> >> --- >> Nothing is forever. >> >> You all now have a Supreme Court, no? > >The Law Lords. > >In recent times they have IIRC ruled that some legislation was illegal. No. Unconstitutional. There is a difference between illegal and unconstitutional. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 29 Nov 2006 08:12 In article <MPG.1fd6433ebfe6315a989d21(a)news.individual.net>, krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: >In article <456BF0FB.23A65686(a)hotmail.com>, >rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >> >> >> krw wrote: >> >> > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >> > > krw wrote: >> > > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >> > > > > krw wrote: >> > > > > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I do wish you'd use a proper sig. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Why ? Is my name not good enough ? >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I don't care what you put in it, use a proper sig separator. Not >> > > > > > doing so makes you no better than a top-poster. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > -- >> > > > > > Keith >> > > > > >> > > > > What exactly is the big deal with that ? >> > > > >> > > > I see. You are no better than a pig-ignorant top-poster. >> > > >> > > You're incapable of explaining yourself is what I see. >> > >> > Dumb donkey, just follow the accepted Usenet standards. Trust me, >> > there are reasons for them. >> >> Feel free to offer a reason for this one. > >Software expects the sig separator so the sig can be snipped from >responses. I don't think eeyore knows the format, especially the appended space. <snip> /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 29 Nov 2006 08:53 In article <456C4AD2.5AEF9B64(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >That's clearly not going to happen overnight ( or even in >> >the long term ) no matter how favourable the circumstances may be. >> >> There is all kinds of stuff that needs somebody to work on it. >> All you have to do is look and start working. My sister worked >> with a gal in the factory. The factory had a very high reject >> count with a particular part. This gal started her own business >> and offered to fix all the rejects of this part. She was making >> tons of money, had quite a few people working for her. > >How many ? > >100,000 ? Of course not. If you want a strong economy that can withstand the usual boom and bust cycles, you need small business to be the backbone of employers--not the unions; not the govnernment; and definitely not the only employer in the country. England is not kind to its wealthy and, since WWII, had been stifling its middle-class. That's what socialism does. Nobody feels they "own" a problem and so will not use any of their ingenuity to solve it. /BAH /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 29 Nov 2006 08:56
In article <149c4$456c71cf$4fe7665$9834(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> In article <62e38$456c4191$4fe703f$8534(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, >> unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>>>In article <be7e8$456c3bb3$4fe703f$8391(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, >>>> unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>In article <456C2E21.87E1BD0D(a)hotmail.com>, >>>>>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Edward Green" <spamspamspam3(a)netzero.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Amazing! That was post 10873. All nicely archived in Google, so that >>>>>>>>>future generations may not lose one word. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I worry about that. One little buyout and the whole archive can >>>>>>>>be gone. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>It already has been bought out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>It was deja.com before google. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>And do you know what's been lost because of that buyout? >>>>> >>>>>Actually? IMO the best of usenet. >>>> >>>> >>>>What is your definition of the best of usenet? >>> >>>The early days. 1980's. >> >> >> Nah. The best days haven't happened yet. > >LOL. I'll play. It won't be usenet. The 80s were awful w.r.t. networking. The computer biz was just starting to learn what didn't work. /BAH |