Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: T Wake on 22 Jan 2007 15:06 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:eovot5$8ss_011(a)s944.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <45B293DB.DEAE84AD(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> There happen to be a lot of people who think that, if the US >>> >> >> >> plays by Geneva convention rules, the Islamic extremists will. >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >Really ? I didn't hear anyone say that. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> You might try to read Carter's book. You might listen to >>> >> >> Hillary Clinton. You might notice the places both she >>> >> >> and Kerry have been visiting in the last few weeks. >>> >> > >>> >> >What has where they're visiting got to do about it ? Have they been >>> >> >visiting extremists ? >>> >> >>> >> Yes. >>> > >>> >Which ones ? >>> >>> Why don't you find out for yourself? That way you might stumble >>> across what these idiots have been announcing and saying, too. >> >>Because I'm not going to make any assumption about whom you had in mind. > > I don't have Kerry's nor Clinton's itenerary. So you simply _assume_ they met with extremists. > The news has mentioned > Syria, Afghanistan, and I don't recall if one of them stopped in > PLO territory. I would expect Hillary to stop. Basically you are just making things up based on your preconceived ideas. Well done. > /BAH > >> >>All you have to do is name a few of these extremists for me or simply shut >>up >>and stop making things up. Simple really. >> >>Graham >>
From: T Wake on 22 Jan 2007 15:07 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:ep2aoe$8ss_005(a)s898.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <ep070n$tuf$1(a)blue.rahul.net>, > kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >>In article <eovot5$8ss_011(a)s944.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, >> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: >>>In article <45B293DB.DEAE84AD(a)hotmail.com>, >>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>> >>>>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>> >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >> >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> >> There happen to be a lot of people who think that, if the US >>>>> >> >> >> plays by Geneva convention rules, the Islamic extremists >>>>> >> >> >> will. >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> >Really ? I didn't hear anyone say that. >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> You might try to read Carter's book. You might listen to >>>>> >> >> Hillary Clinton. You might notice the places both she >>>>> >> >> and Kerry have been visiting in the last few weeks. >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> >What has where they're visiting got to do about it ? Have they >>>>> >> >been >>>>> >> >visiting extremists ? >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Yes. >>>>> > >>>>> >Which ones ? >>>>> >>>>> Why don't you find out for yourself? That way you might stumble >>>>> across what these idiots have been announcing and saying, too. >>>> >>>>Because I'm not going to make any assumption about whom you had in mind. >>> >>>I don't have Kerry's nor Clinton's itenerary. The news has mentioned >>>Syria, Afghanistan, and I don't recall if one of them stopped in >>>PLO territory. I would expect Hillary to stop. >> >>You said they met with extremists. Now it comes out you had no evidence >>for that. That they stopped in some places is all you have as fact. All >>the rest is something you assumed. > > Do you consider Syria to be moderate and, thus, not a problem? Irrelevant. If, for example, they met with US military officials in Afghanistan does that mean they met with extremists?
From: T Wake on 22 Jan 2007 15:08 "Lloyd Parker" <lparker(a)emory.edu> wrote in message news:eorge7$41d$1(a)leto.cc.emory.edu... > In article <eoqgna$8qk_002(a)s790.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>In article <45AFA79A.97173FE9(a)hotmail.com>, >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> There happen to be a lot of people who think that, if the US >>>> >> plays by Geneva convention rules, the Islamic extremists will. >>>> > >>>> >Really ? I didn't hear anyone say that. >>>> >>>> You might try to read Carter's book. You might listen to >>>> Hillary Clinton. You might notice the places both she >>>> and Kerry have been visiting in the last few weeks. >>> >>>What has where they're visiting got to do about it ? Have they been >>>visiting >>>extremists ? >> >>Yes. >> >>/BAH > > Of course, you probably consider Ted Kennedy an extremist. You mean he wasn't? -- for the humour impaired this is a joke.
From: T Wake on 22 Jan 2007 15:11 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:eotf87$8qk_001(a)s901.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <5fbac$45afadb6$4fe7416$12070(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, > unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: <snip> >> >>Kirwan, Wake, and Smith give ideas a good run for their money >>and are the ones who represent the mindset you're discussing >>here. > > None of them are European thinkers. I am. > Wake just posts to make > trouble and/or create smoke. Far from it. I just think you are trolling. No one could hold the inconsitent, self-contratictory, viewpoints you do and still be able to tie their own shoe laces let alone connect to the internet..... >>They're worthy of consideration and engagement. In fact, >>each of them is known for sometimes bringing points to the >>discussion that have head turning value. > > I disagree about Wake but the other two have not wasted my > time at all. I am flattered. <snip>
From: T Wake on 22 Jan 2007 15:18
"Ken Smith" <kensmith(a)green.rahul.net> wrote in message news:eopfbt$jqt$3(a)blue.rahul.net... > In article <eonr69$8qk_001(a)s887.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: ><snip> >>The general population of Iran likes Westerners and their products. >>It is the religious leaders who don't and desire to get rid of >>it all. Since they can't make their peoples obey them, the logical >>action is to destroy the source of the irritation. This means >>all of the Western-style of doing trade, business, manufacturing >>and development. This is a clash civilizations. This is what >>I've been talking about all along. > > So now you admit that they are a minority. This is major progress! > Finally we are getting somewhere. > <snip> And sadly, when progress was a possibility, she dropped the subthread. |