Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: T Wake on 22 Jan 2007 15:20 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:eonq8i$8ss_004(a)s887.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <45ACE553.DDB02D57(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >>> Why do you think there was a conflict in Southeast Asia after >>> France left? >> >>You mean *before* France left actually. > > I know. It was one of those areas that wasn't cleared up > as a part of WWII. Now, read my question again and note > the use of the word _after_. It is still a largely meaningless question. Changing the after to before doesn't change much. Why was there a conflict in Southeast Asia after the US left? All equally vague and meaningless, in that pretty much all conflicts have a variety of intertwined causes.
From: unsettled on 22 Jan 2007 15:24 T Wake wrote: > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > news:eoo7cj$8qk_001(a)s1231.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > > <snip> > >>Now take a look at the rules of engagement that our enemies use. >>They are depending on us to abide by _our_ rules; they will make >>great advances in gaining power because we have tied ourselves >>up in "we better than they are" attitudes; this is arrogance. > > > <snip> > > You are either trolling or insane. > > Re-read this post and see if it is what you meant to say. There's a logic to what she said. An example is taking a knife to a gunfight.
From: unsettled on 22 Jan 2007 15:30 T Wake wrote: > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > news:eoqmqj$8qk_003(a)s790.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > >>In article <45AFA70E.49B8825A(a)hotmail.com>, >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> > <snip> > >>>nor were US troops >>>stationed in the Middle East. >> >>Then these problems cannot be the fault of the US. > > > Eh? Do you have a list of logical fallacies you need to use in each post? > > Your line of reasoning here is nonsensical. > > 1 - *you* assert the problems are based on the situation 100 years ago - > with nothing to support this claim. > 2 - Eeyore says that there were no US troops in the Middle East then > 3 - You use this to conclude the problems have nothing to do with the US. > > Blimey. > > Talk about building from a false premise. Shame on both you for taking Eeyore's insane ramblings as anything to consider Your Lawrence was there stirring up all sorts of trouble, trying to unite the Arabs against everyone else including their only salvation at the time, the British Army. They should have sent him home much earlier. His legacy remains very much intact.
From: T Wake on 22 Jan 2007 15:40 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:eonuoe$8qk_004(a)s887.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <45AD055D.DE60C4B8(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>T Wake wrote: >> >>> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>> >>> > Why do you people keep forgetting Syria? None seem to think >>> > about Egypt. >>> >>> No one forgets Syria and people do think of about Egypt. As I pointed >>> out > to >>> you in a previous post both those nations are important. >> >>< snip > >> >> >>> Now on to some important questions which fall out of your post. Why do >>> you >>> keep forgetting about Tunisia? None seem to think of Morocco. >> >>Or Turkey even ? Yet another Muslim nation in the region. > > I have not forgotten Turkey. It is also currently under pressure > to become more conservative. You should watch all the individual > laws and policies that get passed and then unpassed. You really > need to listen to the real news. What about Tunisia? What about Morocco? What about the rest of my post?
From: T Wake on 22 Jan 2007 15:57
<jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:eonusa$8qk_005(a)s887.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <45AF7CDB.689B2330(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >>> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >>> ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>> > >>> >> Why do you people keep forgetting Syria? None seem to think >>> >> about Egypt. >>> > >>> >No one forgets Syria and people do think of about Egypt. As I pointed >>> >out > to >>> >you in a previous post both those nations are important. >>> > >>> >From a military point of view Syria is almost a joke, Israel pretty >>> >much >>> >ensures Syria is never going invade another country. Syria has no signs >>> >of >>> >developing nuclear weapons. >>> >>> You are being foolish. They don't have to develop them; all >>> they have to do is buy them or acquire them from a neighbor. >> >>Other than Pakistan who would that be ? Israel ! ? > > You really don't seem to be paying attention to what's going on. > The guy in North Korea has already said he wants to sell some. So you advocate invading Syria because you think North Korea is a neighbour.... Amazing. |