Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 22 Jan 2007 07:25 In article <45B39764.DED3A065(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> > >> >> I am highly allergic to poll outcomes as an convincing argument >> >> about how popular an idea is. >> > >> >Because you'd rather believe the voices in your head I imagine. >> >> Since I have an ability to think and learn, those voices in my >> head are quite useful. > >You need to do a heck of a lot of learning ! Of course. I discover all kinds of things that I didn't know I didn't know. That is when the real fun begins. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 22 Jan 2007 07:28 In article <45B39865.2DBD9E3A(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Expect BAH to now suggest that the agriculture in California is >> >> >> >> >about to collapse. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> It already has. Adding the burden of a minimum wage hike will >> >> >> >> make it worse. >> >> >> > >> >> >> >I truly don't believe it ! >> >> >> >> >> >> Now read the past few weeks' weather reports. >> >> > >> >> >What would I find there ? >> >> >> >> Snow and freezing temperatures. Sigh! You claimed that >> >> you knew more than I about the real news. >> > >> >Since when is a local weather report *news* ??? >> >> When it destroys the season's agriculture crop. You should look >> at a map. California isn't quite a "local" area; it's very large. > >I know but California weather's not terribly relevant to me. It is indirectly. > > >> >> So why haven't you heard nor learned about the two (California mess and >> >> Democrat leadership visits)? >> > >> >What's that got to do with anything ? >> >> The issue is your claim that you know more about what's going on >> in the world than I do. The discussion drifted to economies >> and the effects of forcing a depressed piece of the economy to >> raise its costs when it's not going to make much money this year. > >The effect of a single year is relatively minute. It would become news if this >started happeneing every year and affected the economy of the area on a >long-term basis Small things affect all economies on a long-term basis in this age of global technology and trade. > > >> Underlying these discussions is the fact that the Democrat leadership >> is insane with no grasp on reality. If there should be a minimum >> wage, the price-setting belongs to the states and not the federal >> government. > >This is only *your view* though. > >To me the Republicans are the insane ones. After all they're the ones running a >huge budget deficit and spending 10% of the US GDP on a pointless war. It is your opinion that countering Islamic extremism is pointless. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 22 Jan 2007 07:30 In article <ep070n$tuf$1(a)blue.rahul.net>, kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >In article <eovot5$8ss_011(a)s944.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: >>In article <45B293DB.DEAE84AD(a)hotmail.com>, >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>> >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >> >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> >> There happen to be a lot of people who think that, if the US >>>> >> >> >> plays by Geneva convention rules, the Islamic extremists will. >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> >Really ? I didn't hear anyone say that. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> You might try to read Carter's book. You might listen to >>>> >> >> Hillary Clinton. You might notice the places both she >>>> >> >> and Kerry have been visiting in the last few weeks. >>>> >> > >>>> >> >What has where they're visiting got to do about it ? Have they been >>>> >> >visiting extremists ? >>>> >> >>>> >> Yes. >>>> > >>>> >Which ones ? >>>> >>>> Why don't you find out for yourself? That way you might stumble >>>> across what these idiots have been announcing and saying, too. >>> >>>Because I'm not going to make any assumption about whom you had in mind. >> >>I don't have Kerry's nor Clinton's itenerary. The news has mentioned >>Syria, Afghanistan, and I don't recall if one of them stopped in >>PLO territory. I would expect Hillary to stop. > >You said they met with extremists. Now it comes out you had no evidence >for that. That they stopped in some places is all you have as fact. All >the rest is something you assumed. Do you consider Syria to be moderate and, thus, not a problem? /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 22 Jan 2007 07:33 In article <ep096t$tuf$4(a)blue.rahul.net>, kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >In article <45B39865.2DBD9E3A(a)hotmail.com>, >Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >[....] >>> >Since when is a local weather report *news* ??? >>> >>> When it destroys the season's agriculture crop. You should look >>> at a map. California isn't quite a "local" area; it's very large. >> >>I know but California weather's not terribly relevant to me. > >Expect an increase in the price of oranges. The reason has nothing at all >to do you the minimum wage etc. I talked about the two facts coinciding at the same time. > BAH is conflating weather conditions with >wages. No. I suggest you do a cost analysis of any business given two facts: the wages increase a lot overnight and the source of profits disappears. <snip> /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 22 Jan 2007 07:35
In article <ep08j3$tuf$3(a)blue.rahul.net>, kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >In article <eovp9j$8ss_013(a)s944.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: >>In article <eoths4$kcm$3(a)blue.rahul.net>, >> kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >>>In article <eot7bl$8qk_016(a)s768.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, >>> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: >>>[...] >>>>Having a forced increase at the same time the agriculture crops >>>>are failing is the exact wrong thing to do at the wrong time. >>> >>>But that hasn't happened here in California. The minimum wage is higher >>>than most other states and has been for some time. The economy is >>>booming. We don't have an unemployment problem worth speaking of. >> >><snort> Riiiight. > >You need to get some facts. So do you. If there is no unemployment on the books, then those illegals wouldn't be coming in to do the work for lower wages. <snip> /BAH |