Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: unsettled on 26 Jan 2007 06:39 T Wake wrote: > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > news:epaaq8$8qk_007(a)s795.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>It >>has continued to underestimate dangers and doesn't seem >>to learn from its mistakes. They can afford to make >>these errors because their governments assume the US will >>save them with its military might. When we don't succeed >>according to their expectations, we get dismissed as not >>knowing anything about how to do foreign policy nor >>statemanship. > You round up with this drivel, which simply shows your lack of > understanding. Less than a year ago, in February 2006: "Lebanon's interior minister has quit after protesters sacked Beirut's Danish embassy in more ructions over cartoons depicting the prophet Muhammad." http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4684250.stm And we said nothing Lebanon, over the past few days, has had its Krystalnacht. "One person is reported dead and several others injured in violent clashes between university students in the Lebanese capital of Beirut. "Officials said the rioting broke out after students belonging to a Shiite group, which supports the Hezbollah-led opposition, argued with members of a pro-government group over Tuesday's general strike. "The violence spilled into nearby streets as protesters tossed rocks at one another. Several fires were set in the streets. "Hezbollah has pledged to topple the western-backed democratic government in the country." http://www.cfra.com/headlines/index.asp?cat=2&nid=46566 (and others.) This rioting has gone on several days. And we said nothing The handwriting is on the wall, with nobody reading it (again). Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:06:31 -0600 Message ID: <R9GdnWobLK3FuijYnZ2dnUVZ8tOmnZ2d(a)pipex.net> [BAH] >If you try to think a little bit, Iran won't need to have >> bases in the beginning. [T Wake] Blimey. This means your earlier post was nonsense then? http://www.silentera.com/CBD/img/elephant.jpg
From: unsettled on 26 Jan 2007 06:54 unsettled wrote: > T Wake wrote: > >> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >> news:epaaq8$8qk_007(a)s795.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > > >>> It >>> has continued to underestimate dangers and doesn't seem >>> to learn from its mistakes. They can afford to make >>> these errors because their governments assume the US will >>> save them with its military might. When we don't succeed >>> according to their expectations, we get dismissed as not >>> knowing anything about how to do foreign policy nor >>> statemanship. > > >> You round up with this drivel, which simply shows your lack of >> understanding. > > > Less than a year ago, in February 2006: > > "Lebanon's interior minister has quit after protesters > sacked Beirut's Danish embassy in more ructions over > cartoons depicting the prophet Muhammad." > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4684250.stm > > And we said nothing > > Lebanon, over the past few days, has had its Krystalnacht. Oddly enough, the only web site that mentions "broken glass" in its reporting happens to be an Indian one. I suppose the more western press avoids the comparison. [Bold Headline] Beirut wakes up to shattered glass, debris "Most of the residents in the Tarek al-Jadidah neighbourhood and areas next to the Arab University were in the streets since the early hours of the morning sweeping shattered glass from their apartments and removing the debris from their balconies." http://www.indiaenews.com/middle-east/20070126/37069.htm "It was commonly called die Kristallnacht (German for 'the crystal night'), evoking many shop windows, mostly owned by Jewish shopkeepers, that were broken during the night." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krystalnacht This time it is the Christians under attack > "One person is reported dead and several others > injured in violent clashes between university students > in the Lebanese capital of Beirut. > > "Officials said the rioting broke out after students > belonging to a Shiite group, which supports the > Hezbollah-led opposition, argued with members of a > pro-government group over Tuesday's general strike. > > "The violence spilled into nearby streets as protesters > tossed rocks at one another. Several fires were set in > the streets. > > "Hezbollah has pledged to topple the western-backed > democratic government in the country." > > http://www.cfra.com/headlines/index.asp?cat=2&nid=46566 > (and others.) > > This rioting has gone on several days. > > And we said nothing > > The handwriting is on the wall, with nobody reading it (again). > > Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:06:31 -0600 > Message ID: <R9GdnWobLK3FuijYnZ2dnUVZ8tOmnZ2d(a)pipex.net> > > [BAH] > >If you try to think a little bit, Iran won't need to have > >> bases in the beginning. > > [T Wake] > Blimey. This means your earlier post was nonsense then? > > http://www.silentera.com/CBD/img/elephant.jpg
From: Phil Carmody on 26 Jan 2007 07:02 MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> writes: > On Thu, 25 Jan 07 13:31:06 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: > > >And you people are talking about the wrong decade. > > > >I was using VT05s in 1972; IIRC, Hastings was typing on his > >breadboard in 1971. I'm still pissed off at him for not > >asking me about the keyboard layout. > > The FCC had emission regs on ALL radiators since the fifties. I'm unable to find evidence that it didn't have them since the mid-late 30s. RF wasn't a new field back then. They took over a previous authority's mantle, and knew what they were dealing with. Phil -- "Home taping is killing big business profits. We left this side blank so you can help." -- Dead Kennedys, written upon the B-side of tapes of /In God We Trust, Inc./.
From: jmfbahciv on 26 Jan 2007 06:58 In article <45B8DD9E.2B9F18AB(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> > >> >> Having been in meetings where these FCC issues were >> >> discussed and hearing how DEC decided what we going to do >> >> with VT05s might give me the idea that I know what I'm talking >> >> about. >> > >> >You mean DEC *were* aware of the prblem after all ? >> > >> >That's not what you previously suggested. >> >> It wasn't a problem in 1972. > >You mean it wasn't widely known to be a problem. No, it wasn't a problem that manufacturers had to deal with because those terminals were never meant to be used in the home. They were to be used in computer rooms which were chock full of gear that emitted lots of EMF. /BAH
From: Phil Carmody on 26 Jan 2007 07:06
unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> writes: > It has come to my attention that a good (top of the line) > computer case matches or exceeds the price of a reasonable > motherboard these days. > > A cheap case is ~1/3 the cost of that same motherboard. > > Can you show me where I'm mistaken? Are they simply marking > up the excellent cases more then the cheap ones? Is there > a conspiracy among manufacturers that they're all setting > their pricing the same way? You're right. The cheaper ones have much cheaper PSUs. Power ratings on PSUs are notoriously exagerated, particularly amongst cheap ones. Phil (4 PSU failures and only 3 HD failures in the last 4 years) -- "Home taping is killing big business profits. We left this side blank so you can help." -- Dead Kennedys, written upon the B-side of tapes of /In God We Trust, Inc./. |