Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: krw on 29 Jan 2007 12:35 In article <epl4qb$6ev$12(a)blue.rahul.net>, kensmith(a)green.rahul.net says... > In article <epkvpg$8qk_005(a)s957.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: > >In article <ef099$45bb6805$4fe7573$21090(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, > > unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: > >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >>> In article <45BB57F0.621024C2(a)hotmail.com>, > >>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>>>unsettled wrote: > >> > >>>>>MassiveProng wrote: > >> > >>>>>> Indeed, dipshit. Laugh. You certainly don't have enough brains to > >>>>>>put forth a real argument. > >> > >>>>>LOL, I work with what you give us to work with, which > >>>>>is actually nothing at all. > >> > >>>>It has to be said the Mr Massive Pong has nailed you on this one. > >> > >>> Not really. MP's company didn't manufacture the cases; they > >>> were ordered. That is not manufacturing them. > >> > >>MP is an "angry man" who lashes out for the sake of lashing out. > > > >I know. It makes it difficult to decode his posts. > > MissingProng is a troll. He does not wish to be understood. MP == DarkMatter == Dimbulb -- Keith
From: T Wake on 29 Jan 2007 12:50 "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:45BE0653.E0431206(a)hotmail.com... > > > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >Let me get this right. >> > >> >You're suggesting that Uncle Joe Stalin *wanted* the USA to go to war >> >against >> >another communist country which was an ally of the USSR ? >> >> People seem to keep forgetting about China...even today. > > China's not a European country btw. I am sure BAH can torture logic to explain that it was partially run by the UK at some time in the past so it counts as European..... (Damn those Boxers)
From: T Wake on 29 Jan 2007 12:53 "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:45BE06B4.FF3A3657(a)hotmail.com... > > > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >> > >> >Are you *now* saying the US did not get involved in Korea because Europe >> >asked for help, but they had to stay because no European country was >> >willing >> >to take responsibility for cleaning up the mess? (Who caused the mess?) >> >> You don't know how WWII and WWI got started? > > I'm sure he does. > > Do you ? So the US involvement in Korea in 1950 was a result of a Serbian dissident shooting Arch Duke Ferdinand.... Such amazing lines of logic. Taking it to it's logical conclusion, it is actually all the fault of ug-nggg who hit gnh-hrg on the head in 12433BC.
From: Tony Lance on 29 Jan 2007 12:54 Big Bertha Thing positron Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/positron.html Access page JPG 56K Image Astrophysics net ring Access site Newsgroup Reviews including talk.politics.guns Round photographic plates. Caption;- Another pair of tracks, arising simultaneously, from a common point. The two particles responsible, for these tracks, produce equal specific ionizations. The one leaving the track of greater curvature is an electron of 27 MeV energy. The one leaving the track of smaller curvature was apparently left, by a particle not then known to exist, a particle identical with the electron, except that it carries a positive charge. It is a 450 MeV positron. From a book by J.D.Stranathan Ph.D., Professor of Physics and Chairman of Department, University of Kansas. The "Particles" of Modern Physics. (C) Copyright The Blakston Co. 1942 Big Bertha Thing forward Friends and family postings are included in the category, forwarded by you from the internet, to the internet, First Class users or conferences. The same terms and conditions apply. There is no student or accademic only exclusion clause, written or implied in them. You are personaly responsible for them. On the question of from address, a new mail item, in reply with quote format, either from you or the conference moderator will do. For the subject line use Fwd: prefix. Occams' Razor says the simplest explanation is usually right. (C) Copyright Tony Lance 1997. To comply with my copyright, please distribute complete copies, free of charge. Tony Lance judemarie(a)bigberthathing.co.uk
From: T Wake on 29 Jan 2007 12:58
<jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:epl056$8qk_007(a)s957.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <45BBC4FF.E0BD2CFA(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>unsettled wrote: >> >>> Only losing nations and their executives ever face the >>> consequences. No nation or national executive engages >>> in war with the thought of losing. >> >>Hmmmm, well there's more than few in the UK who would like to see Tony >>Blair >>prosecuted for war crimes. > > Under whose law? Islam's? No. You might be surprised but the UK is not run under Sharia law (which is what I assume you mean when you say "islam's"). The implications Eeyore is talking about are people using UK law and internationally agreed treaties / articles which carry the weight of law. I am surprised you haven't heard of this concept. You may discover the acts and process *you* advocate fit into "Islamic law" much better than to any Western Civilisations legal system. >> >>Channel 4 TV even made the concept into a 2 part drama. > > And this doesn't worry you about the hidden agenda of your > media? There certainly was no "hidden" agenda about that drama. It was pretty blatantly obvious. That said, most people are aware it was a "drama." You may want to investigate that concept. 24 is not reality TV. |