Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 29 Jan 2007 08:46 In article <b4671$45bb8c1f$4fe730b$22334(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> In article <epfj3s$8qk_006(a)s788.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, >> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: >> [.....] > >>>You keep insisting that the people who want to destroy Western >>>civilization are criminals. Under whose law? > >> Those who acted in the US broke many US laws before 9/11. The ones in the >> UK broke many law of the UK. The ones in Spain broke spanish law. > >>> When a military >>>group from another country blows up bridges and trains and kills >>>civilians, I call that a war, not a criminal act. > >> But that isn't what is happening so why to you bring it up? > >The definition seems to be a large part of the problem. Yes. And it is the method these people are using to deny reality. They are not the only ones. We have political leaders who are doing the same thing and encouraging this blindness. <snip> /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 29 Jan 2007 08:51 In article <M9GdnS-x7KLMOSbYnZ2dnUVZ8qugnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >news:epfj3s$8qk_006(a)s788.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >> In article <epd57v$f3g$6(a)leto.cc.emory.edu>, >> lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: ><snip> >>> >>>No, but it does mean they have the right to a trial before they're >>>punished. >> >> You keep insisting that the people who want to destroy Western >> civilization are criminals. Under whose law? > >Well, if they do it in the UK, under UK law. I assume the same would be true >in any other country. Do you include Iran and Syria in that "other country" list? > >Hasn't the US passed legislation designed to prevent terrorism? No. The purpose of the legislation is to deal with this kind of war that Islamic fundamentalists are waging. > >> When a military >> group from another country blows up bridges and trains and kills >> civilians, I call that a war, not a criminal act. > >Which country has invaded the US? Nation of Islam. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 29 Jan 2007 08:52 In article <epgg4o$a46$5(a)blue.rahul.net>, kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >In article <M9GdnS-x7KLMOSbYnZ2dnUVZ8qugnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, >T Wake <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >[....] >>Which country has invaded the US? > >Pakistan. Didn't you hear about 7/11. :) > > > >Note to nonUSAians: Yes, that is a joke. 7/11 is a type of store and a >stereotype is that they are run by pakistanies. > Those people really like our brand of capitalism. Do you think they want to go back to the "old ways"? /BAH
From: Phil Carmody on 29 Jan 2007 09:06 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com writes: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > > >> lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: > >> > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>>You [jmfbahciv] really do not want to live in a representative democracy > do > >> you? > >> >> > >> >>Even a representative democracy needs to have some way to deal > >> >>with the people who go after little kids, and make other kinds > >> >>of messes. A democracy does not, and never has, meant that > >> >>all people can do anything they want without punishment. > >> >> > >> > > >> >No, but it does mean they have the right to a trial before they're > punished. > >> > >> You keep insisting that the people who want to destroy Western > >> civilization are criminals. Under whose law? > > > >The relevant law of the land in question. > > Muslims don't honor any laws other than their own. So now, > under whose law? The law of the land in question. God you're dense. Phil -- "Home taping is killing big business profits. We left this side blank so you can help." -- Dead Kennedys, written upon the B-side of tapes of /In God We Trust, Inc./.
From: Phil Carmody on 29 Jan 2007 09:10
jmfbahciv(a)aol.com writes: > In article <epg0g5$pn5$3(a)blue.rahul.net>, > kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: > >In article <45BB5BCC.CA4B3110(a)hotmail.com>, > >Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >[.....] > >>> You keep insisting that the people who want to destroy Western > >>> civilization are criminals. Under whose law? > >> > >>The relevant law of the land in question. > > > >Also, I believe they violated German law too. Even when they did not act > >in Germany. > > But they didn't violate their own. If they are in their own country, then they abide by the laws of the land in question, namely their own. If they offend in the US, then the land in question will be US laws. > So, are you really that > arrogant that you insist your country's criminal laws apply > everywhere across the globe? No he isn't, as he doesn't. Your reading comprehension is abysmal. > If so, why are there such things as extradition treaties? Because some people commit offences in countries where they are not currently resident. Your ability to come over as being as thick as two short planks is swiftly becoming legendary. Phil -- "Home taping is killing big business profits. We left this side blank so you can help." -- Dead Kennedys, written upon the B-side of tapes of /In God We Trust, Inc./. |