Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 4 Feb 2007 08:14 In article <GvGdnRVWH_9oV1nYRVnyjwA(a)pipex.net>, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >news:eq22g5$8qk_003(a)s939.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >> In article <45C37018.10BD636(a)hotmail.com>, >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> So, if it's on its own circuit, how can the stove affect the >>>> >> wiring of the plug of the radio? >>>> > >>>> >You clearly don't understand how RF energy propagates. It doesn't >>>> >matter >>>> >which circuit it's on. >>>> >>>> Exactly. And it can't be the house wiring. >>> >>>Of course it can be. >> >> Then explain why I did have the same effects with the stove >> that was replaced. >> > >Re-read your post here. Yea. The sentence is missing a not. /BAH
From: T Wake on 4 Feb 2007 08:22 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:eq4jtm$8ss_007(a)s795.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <eq2foe$2bi$4(a)blue.rahul.net>, > kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >>In article <epvkjc$8qk_004(a)s893.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, >> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: >>>In article <epqdem$lk3$14(a)blue.rahul.net>, >>> kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >>[.....] >>>>Oh good now you admit that there are moderates and exteremists. >>> >>>This is more smoke and mirrors. I do not lump moderates and >>>extremists together; you appear to have done this by assuming >>>that, when I talk about extremists, I'm also talking >>>about moderates. >> >>You need to go back and read your posts from a while back. You did indeed >>lump them together. > > It would only take one action to cause all of Islam to join > those extremists. This is an interesting line of reasoning to explore. What sort of action do you think would be the sufficient trigger for *all* of Islam (and this, I assume, includes the secular states like Tunisa as well as the Taleban) to unite and side with the extremists? I think it would have to be big. It would have to be able to be spun into something like a war. Maybe spun into something like a war on a way of life. Do you agree? Do you have different ideas? > Some day, perhaps you will think a little > bit more. Ha.
From: T Wake on 4 Feb 2007 08:23 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:eq4ltf$8ss_015(a)s795.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <7uedneQg-LX8IFnYnZ2dnUVZ8qSnnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >> >><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>news:eq22n6$8qk_005(a)s939.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>> In article <45C37833.3475050F(a)hotmail.com>, >>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>> >>>>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>> >> >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >>>>> >> >> >"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in >>>>> >> >> >message >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> >> Why is it that so many Americans seem to believe in perpetual >>> motion >>>>> >> >> >> devices / free energy / cars that run on water btw ? >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> >Habishi isn't American. >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> And he got his training in England. >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> >Do you have any evidence for this ? >>>>> >> >>>>> >> He said so. >>>>> > >>>>> >When was this ? >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> Best estimate is about two years before Franz Heymann died. >>>> >>>>You talk in riddles as ever. >>>> >>>>I suppose it was too much to expect you to name a year and some context >>>>? >>> >>> I gave you an estimate of the year. Franz and I were trying >>> to get habshi to test his ideas. That's when habshi told >>> where he went to school. I can't recall the name of the school-- >>> Cambridge is what pops up but I can't say if that's the right one. >> >>He was lying. > > That is possible. Since the guy has no imagination, I figured > he couldn't make that one up. I would suspect that is it more likely he has no education than he went to a UK university (of pretty much any calibre).
From: T Wake on 4 Feb 2007 08:25 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:eq4m2r$8ss_016(a)s795.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <45C4C7E2.566BDE9C(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >> >> >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >>> >> >> >> >"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in > message >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> Why is it that so many Americans seem to believe in >>> >> >> >> >> perpetual >>> >> >> >> >> motion devices / free energy / cars that run on water btw ? >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >Habishi isn't American. >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> And he got his training in England. >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >Do you have any evidence for this ? >>> >> >> >>> >> >> He said so. >>> >> > >>> >> >When was this ? >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> Best estimate is about two years before Franz Heymann died. >>> > >>> >You talk in riddles as ever. >>> > >>> >I suppose it was too much to expect you to name a year and some context >>> >? >>> >>> I gave you an estimate of the year. >> >>That's totally meaningless to someone who doesn't know Franz Heymann. Did > that >>not occur to you ? > > Sure. But you have said you can use Google. I gave you an incantation. > >> >> >>> Franz and I were trying to get habshi to test his ideas. >> >>As if he would ever do that ! > > This omission (not doing one's own work) was the topic of that half-year > in this newsgroup. >> >> >>> That's when habshi told where he went to school. I can't recall the >>> name > of >>> the school-- >>> Cambridge is what pops up but I can't say if that's the right one. >> >>There's a Cambridge Mass too. > > Son, that is a town; it is not a school. It is a city in the UK. The university gets called "Cambridge" because of where it is located - as in "University *of* Cambridge."
From: jmfbahciv on 4 Feb 2007 08:21
In article <RdSdnUfAQ6IlQlnYnZ2dnUVZ8sGvnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >news:eq22e9$8qk_002(a)s939.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >> In article <45C36FC0.9975B959(a)hotmail.com>, >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> >Rationing continued after the war btw. >>>> >> >>>> >> I know. That is another point of evidence that England couldn't >>>> >> shake the socialist type of governing. >>>> > >>>> >It has zilch to do with socialism and everything to do with a shortage >>>> >of >>>> >food you nitwit. >>>> >>>> There wasn't a shortage after the war was done. >>> >>>Yes there was. >>> >>> >>>> >Did you know that health actually improved during the period of >>>> >rationing >> btw >>>> >? >>>> >>>> Do those stats exclude everybody who died from bombs and bullets? >>>> >>> >>>I said *health*. Do you not understand ? >> >> Yes. I understood. > >So why did you mention deaths from bombs and bullets? The health data of those people would have been removed from the stats because their cause of death wasn't disease. > >> I also understand that stats can be misinterpreted. >> You moved a large part of your population from the cities to the >> countryside. > >Really? Do you mean children? Yes. > Large parts of the UK population were moved >into the military as well. Exactly. > >> That might also have more to do with *health* than >> your implication that a government controlling your food purchasing >> creates healthier conditions. > >So what are you arguing against? It is a thread drift. >We have previously determined you make up >your own interpretations of statistics in the past, so I assume you are >doing the same here. Eeyore is laying groundwork for justifying going back to rationing. He prefers being told what to do and having to be responsible for any decisions. This is one of the reasons he cannot see the current world situtation with Islamic extremists as a threat to his lifestyle. Eeyore is not the only one. It appears that a large number of people think in the same manner. /BAH |