From: Ken Smith on
In article <45C5201F.C179A0D5(a)hotmail.com>,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
[.... computer .....]
>I suggest you consider the difference between general purpose and embedded.
>
>Can BAH's stove print "Hello world" for example ?

Could Colossus?

>
>Graham
>
>


--
--
kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge

From: MassiveProng on
On Sat, 03 Feb 2007 16:15:21 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com>
Gave us:

>MassiveProng wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 03 Feb 2007 14:43:56 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com>
>> Gave us:
>>
>>
>>>MassiveProng wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Try again, please. Just so you know, the definition put up by the
>>>>unsettledTard is not correct either.
>>>
>>>I get mine from reasonable sources on the internet, with
>>>the appropriate URL displayed in close proximity.
>>>
>>>Your definitions, on the other hand, are unique.
>>
>>
>> A microcontroller does not compute. It responds to hardware input,
>> and responds explicitly in hardware.
>>
>> The oven has a clock, a timer that is tied to that clock, and power
>> links to oven elements that the timer can CONTROL, as well as thermal
>> inputs that get referred to. There are no computations made.
>>
>> A computer takes what we call DATA, and performs computational tasks
>> on it to turn it into what we call INFOrmation.
>>
>> There is a difference, and you and BAH obviously do not know what
>> that difference is.
>>
>> http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/microcontroller
>>
>> http://m-w.com/dictionary/microcontroller
>>
>> Neither mention the word computer at all.
>
>An electronic device for the storage and processing of information.
>www.micro2000uk.co.uk/hardware_glossary.htm


They do not process any information. Look up the word information.

They control hardware switches, and cause hardware switches to be
thrown.

BIG difference.
From: unsettled on
MassiveProng wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Feb 2007 16:15:21 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com>
> Gave us:
>
>
>>MassiveProng wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Sat, 03 Feb 2007 14:43:56 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com>
>>>Gave us:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>MassiveProng wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Try again, please. Just so you know, the definition put up by the
>>>>>unsettledTard is not correct either.
>>>>
>>>>I get mine from reasonable sources on the internet, with
>>>>the appropriate URL displayed in close proximity.
>>>>
>>>>Your definitions, on the other hand, are unique.
>>>
>>>
>>> A microcontroller does not compute. It responds to hardware input,
>>>and responds explicitly in hardware.
>>>
>>> The oven has a clock, a timer that is tied to that clock, and power
>>>links to oven elements that the timer can CONTROL, as well as thermal
>>>inputs that get referred to. There are no computations made.
>>>
>>> A computer takes what we call DATA, and performs computational tasks
>>>on it to turn it into what we call INFOrmation.
>>>
>>> There is a difference, and you and BAH obviously do not know what
>>>that difference is.
>>>
>>>http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/microcontroller


I looked at this and it says a CPU is integral, following
the hotlink for CPU in the article leads to another which
defines this as a computer.


>>>http://m-w.com/dictionary/microcontroller

This one leads to a Britannica article. I don't subscribe.

>>> Neither mention the word computer at all.

Wrong.

>>An electronic device for the storage and processing of information.
>>www.micro2000uk.co.uk/hardware_glossary.htm

> They do not process any information. Look up the word information.

> They control hardware switches, and cause hardware switches to be
> thrown.

> BIG difference.

Once again your definitions are unique. Don't forget
you're posting to a physics newsgroup.

Pedestrian definitions follow:


data: a collection of facts from which conclusions may be drawn

wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn (definition of information)



"Data that has been processed to add or create meaning and
hopefully knowledge for the person who receives it. Information
is the output of information systems."

dssresources.com/glossary/dssglossary1999.html



"That which is extracted from a compilation of data in
response to a specific need."

www.utmb.edu/is/security/glossary.htm (definition of information"



"Organized data which is understood to have significance and meaning."

www.christlinks.com/glossary2.html (definition of information)



"Facts, concepts, or instructions; any sort of knowledge or
supposition which can be communicated."

cedar.web.cern.ch/CEDAR/glossary.html (definition of information)



"Messages used as the basis for decision-making.:

www.pbs.org/weta/myjourneyhome/teachers/glossary.html (definition
of information)


This is obviously too complex for your technician mind to
wrap itself around.


From: mmeron on
In article <Ic9xh.7553$O02.4074(a)newssvr11.news.prodigy.net>, Fred Kasner <fkasner(a)sbcglobal.net> writes:
>
>The work in the first nuclear reactor (at the west stands of Stagg Field
>a the U. of Chicago)

Right across the street from my office, I can see the monument from my
window.

> was the experiments that Fermi et alia used to
>demonstrate the reality of sustained nuclear fission as well as to breed
>some plutonium. They were not certain that the process would be self
>sustaining.

Indeed, they couldn't be sure of anything. It was a journey into the
unknown.

> Fermi who was the experimenter and theoretician par
>excellence had missed fission many years earlier. He wasn't going to go
>off half-cocked in this endeavor.
>FK

Fermi was a rarity, physics could use couple more like him. As you
said, a great experimenter and a great theoretician. Very few like
him in the history of physics, fewer yet in this era of
specialization.

Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool,
meron(a)cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"
From: Eeyore on


unsettled wrote:

> MassiveProng wrote:
> > unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> Gave us:
> >>MassiveProng wrote:
> >>>
> >>> A computer takes what we call DATA, and performs computational tasks
> >>>on it to turn it into what we call INFOrmation.
> >>>
> >>> There is a difference, and you and BAH obviously do not know what
> >>>that difference is.
> >>>
> >>>http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/microcontroller
>
> I looked at this and it says a CPU is integral, following
> the hotlink for CPU in the article leads to another which
> defines this as a computer.

There is no way in the world that a CPU is a computer.

That you should even make such a suggestion is the proof that you're clueless.

Graham