Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: YD on 6 Oct 2006 06:52 On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 03:53:32 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >YD wrote: >> >> Positively so. All you have left is posing as powerful know-it-alls on >> the internet. >> >> Ever tried to figure what you look like to those outside of your tight >> little circle of cronies? > > > What's wrong? Did your only "friend" blow out his brains to get away >from you? I am 100% disabled, but it doesn't keep me stuck at home. I >can still do some work, some days so I do volunteer work to help other >disabled people in my area. You, on the other hand are always bitter, >and trying to slam anyone who has a clue. Clue to what, exactly? This far all you have done is rant about exterminating everything outside US borders. - YD. -- Remove HAT if replying by mail.
From: Eeyore on 6 Oct 2006 06:46 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > > >> another possibility is > >> the goal is to cede to these extremists > > > >Are you really that monumentally stupid ? > > > >Listening to their greivances isn't 'ceding' btw. > > Arafat used this tactic. He kept people at the table talking > about peace to give his side time to accumulate weapons. He > even got all these rich countries to fund his efforts. You're suggesting that because one person did this then we must never again listen ? That's a very blinkered view indeed. You can't change attitudes with bullets. Graham
From: jmfbahciv on 6 Oct 2006 05:43 In article <ZQ8Vg.19638$Ij.7364(a)newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >news:eg2od9$8qk_004(a)s829.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >> In article <VAVUg.13310$7I1.3298(a)newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>, >> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>> >>>"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>news:452415BE.DB0DBC1E(a)hotmail.com... >>>> >>>> >>>> Keith wrote: >>>> >>>>> rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >>>>> >>>>> > And you think you can defeat 'radical Islam' with bombs and bullets ? >>>>> >>>>> I know there is no choice. Perhaps you want to submit? >>>> >>>> There is no need to 'submit' >>>> >>>> You're living in a perversely stupid fantasy paranoid world. >>> >>>It comes from the constant bombardment by Bush's fear-mongering--it's his >>>way of keeping power over people. >> >> I think you should start to listen to Bush instead of listening >> to other people supposedly repeating what Bush said. I would >> suggest you start with his January, 2006 TV speech. > >I do and I did. > > >>> People start to lose perspective on what >>>is happening and why. It really is a very powerful narcotic. >> >> People can also lose perspective if they assume that Bush >> is always wrong and is the cause of all ills which is the >> only thing you hear from his political opposition. > >I don't. I evaluate critically. > > >> This causes a lot of people to overlook the fact that these >> same politicians do not intend to deal with the threat >> to the nation. > >Why do you assume that they "do not intend to deal with the threat"? They say so. Whenever asked for specifics, the Democrat leadership replies with, "Trust me." If they had anything worked out, they would specify. Now, it is possible that their plans are such that noboby, including the most rabid leftist, would vote for them. However, I am still assuming that these people have a single functioning brain cell among them. > You >don't think that perhaps they have a *better* way to deal with it than is >being used now? (Yeah, yeah, I know, we've gone full circle on the whole >thread.) No, I don't think they have a better way to deal with it. If they did, they would be trumpeting it in all campaigning and getting votes and getting elected. In fact, I don't they have any plans to deal with it. /BAH
From: JoeBloe on 6 Oct 2006 06:45 On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 01:47:13 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" <nobody(a)nowhere.com> Gave us: > >"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >news:7fcbi2t7o8chj90omrt9n69qg4jqjiejq8(a)4ax.com... > >> You're an idiot. People don't stalk idiots. You prove that one >> *can* be wrong *all* the time. >> >> Doing a lookup on *your* IP address is NOT stalking, dipshit. > >The FBI begs to differ. > Every legitimate post made to Usenet contains the sender's IP addy in it. All you google fucktards and other asswipes that anonymize are not legitimate... but can still be found out. And no, that is NOT how the FBI defines stalking.
From: Eeyore on 6 Oct 2006 06:47
jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > ISTR that Bin Laden's next goal is to kill 3 million people Cite ? Graham |