Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Kurt Ullman on 6 Oct 2006 08:14 In article <eg56e4$8ss_004(a)s831.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > In article > <kurtullman-0F836F.10021405102006(a)customer-201-125-217-207.uninet.net.mx>, > Kurt Ullman <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >In article <w88Vg.9105$vJ2.869(a)newssvr12.news.prodigy.com>, > > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > >> > >> To consider those real issues but to call the abuse of minors by a > >> Congressman "a smokescreen" is about as disingenuous as politics gets. > >> > > Define abuse, (seriously). I usually reserve that term for actual > >physical contact (sexual, assaultive) and (so far at least) there is > >nothing to indicate that either happened. Although I am the first to > >suggest that the possibility it did happen is much more likely given > >both the history of abuse and behaviors that got him into trouble. > > Talkin' dirty is illegal, but I still say it is a couple orders of > >magnitude below physical and sexual abuse. > > When did talking dirty become illegal? > > /BAH Talking dirty to those under 18 using electronic means such as instant messaging and e-mails is illegal. (Due to a recently passed federal law). Now you happy (grin)?
From: Kurt Ullman on 6 Oct 2006 08:18 In article <452633ED.B02A967A(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > > > > >> another possibility is > > >> the goal is to cede to these extremists > > > > > >Are you really that monumentally stupid ? > > > > > >Listening to their greivances isn't 'ceding' btw. > > > > Arafat used this tactic. He kept people at the table talking > > about peace to give his side time to accumulate weapons. He > > even got all these rich countries to fund his efforts. > > You're suggesting that because one person did this then we must never > again listen ? That's a very blinkered view indeed. > Heck not learning from earlier mistakes is somewhat past merely blinkered...
From: jmfbahciv on 6 Oct 2006 07:20 In article <452633ED.B02A967A(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> > >> >> another possibility is >> >> the goal is to cede to these extremists >> > >> >Are you really that monumentally stupid ? >> > >> >Listening to their greivances isn't 'ceding' btw. >> >> Arafat used this tactic. He kept people at the table talking >> about peace to give his side time to accumulate weapons. He >> even got all these rich countries to fund his efforts. > >You're suggesting that because one person did this then we must never >again listen ? That's a very blinkered view indeed. It is a tactic that worked. Don't you think others will try the same thing if it succeeds in fooling all of the Democrats all of the time? > >You can't change attitudes with bullets. My attitude changed. And the trigger was two little airplane missles. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 6 Oct 2006 07:21 In article <45263511.774BF7DA(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >You can't accept that Islam isn't a threat to your lifestyle ? >> >> >> >> Not only is it a threat, but it has already begun to >> >> alter my lifestyle. My goal is to ensure that it >> >> alter 100% of my lifestyle, if I'm allowed to exist. >> > >> >Tell me more about this threat you perceive. >> > >> >What exactly is it that you're afraid of ? >> >> Loss of enough knowledge of how to do things that it will >> take another 1000 years to reinvent the wheel. > >Are you actually serious ? Yes. I'm working on a 1000 year scenario and trying to shortcut the cold start so that it will only be 500 years. > >That bogeyman really has got to be very big indeed. Perhaps you should reexamine your assumptions. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 6 Oct 2006 07:26
In article <452630ED.D2D922DC(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >John Larkin wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >John Larkin wrote: >> >> On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 23:10:34 +0100, Eeyore >> >> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >John Larkin wrote: >> >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >John Larkin wrote: >> >> >> >> lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>A lot of this anti-US fervor started with Democrat Presidential >> >> >> >> >>candidates trying out their sound bytes in 2002-2004 in Europe. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>/BAH >> >> >> >> >OH BS. It started with Bush invading another nation. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Actually, it started with FDR invading another nation. France, >> >> >> >> specifically. >> >> >> > >> >> >> >You're being very very silly. >> >> >> > >> >> >> >Graham >> >> >> >> >> >> I don't think so. A couple of things are at work here. One is the >> >> >> military and cultural and technological and scientific dominance of >> >> >> the USA as compared to Europe, which is bound to cause some >> >> >> resentment. The other is expressed in the Chinese proverb, "if you >> >> >> save someone's life, they will hate you forever." >> >> > >> >> >You really are monumentally stupid. >> >> >> >> You are fat, poor, unhappy, and frustrated by the state of the world. >> >> I am none of these. Explain to me why I am the stupid one here. >> > >> >Because you're stupidly happy in your profound ignorance ? >> >> It's not ignorance; I am happy by choice, then design. Try it some >> time. >> >> >The only thing that worries me about the 'state of the world' is what >> >idiocy America's up to next. >> >> You are blaming externals for an internal state, a convenient and >> paralyzing cop-out. For anyone reasonably healthy and living in a >> free, developed country not to be happy is stunning stupidity. Sad, >> too. > >Our freedoms are under threat as a result of American stupidity. Now I understand you. It is not Bin Laden's fault that he is going to kill a lot of people. It's the Americans' fault that caused Islamic extremists to want to destroy Western civilization. Since these extremists refer to events in the 14th and 15th centuries, then it must be the Americans who committed these acts that justfify the killing. /BAH |